Soft-tissue facial characteristics of attractive and normal adolescent boys and girls.

OBJECTIVES To identify possible esthetic canons in facial size and shape of Italian adolescent boys and girls. MATERIALS AND METHODS The three-dimensional coordinates of 50 facial landmarks (forehead, eyes, nose, cheeks, mouth, jaw, ears) were collected in 231 healthy, reference adolescents (10- 17 years old) and in 93 similar age group "attractive" adolescents selected by a commercial casting organization. Soft-tissue facial angles, distances, areas, and volumes were computed. Comparisons were made with analysis of variance. RESULTS Attractive adolescents had wider, shorter, and less deep faces than reference adolescents, with a relatively larger forehead and maxilla, and a reduced mandible relative to the maxilla. Lips were larger and more prominent, and the nasolabial angle was reduced, but in older boys the effect was reversed. The prominence of the soft-tissue profile, and of the maxilla relative to the mandible, were larger in attractive boys, but smaller in attractive girls than in their reference peers. In the horizontal plane, attractive "young" adolescents had a flatter face, while the opposite pattern was observed in the "old" adolescents, with a relatively more prominent chin. Attractive adolescents had smaller noses than reference subjects of the same age and sex. CONCLUSIONS Overall, all the measurements appeared sufficiently homogenous, and the quantitative characteristics of an "attractive" face well defined. Esthetic reference values can be used to determine optimal timing and goals in orthodontic treatment.

[1]  Turley Pk,et al.  The female soft tissue profile as presented in fashion magazines during the 1900s: a photographic analysis. , 1999 .

[2]  P. Turley,et al.  The female soft tissue profile as presented in fashion magazines during the 1900s: a photographic analysis. , 1999, The International journal of adult orthodontics and orthognathic surgery.

[3]  A. Grobbelaar,et al.  The esthetic properties of lips: a comparison of models and nonmodels. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[4]  V F Ferrario,et al.  Facial morphometry of television actresses compared with normal women. , 1995, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[5]  Edsel Ing,et al.  Ocular adnexal asymmetry in models: a magazine photograph analysis. , 2006, Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie.

[6]  B. Fink,et al.  Male facial appearance signals physical strength to women , 2007, American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council.

[7]  D. Wertheim,et al.  The use of anthropometric proportion indices in the measurement of facial attractiveness. , 2005, European journal of orthodontics.

[8]  Stephen Todd,et al.  Perceptions of facial aesthetics in two and three dimensions. , 2005, European journal of orthodontics.

[9]  Chiarella Sforza,et al.  Three-dimensional facial morphometry of attractive children and normal children in the deciduous and early mixed dentition. , 2007, The Angle orthodontist.

[10]  F. Bookstein,et al.  Visualizing facial shape regression upon 2nd to 4th digit ratio and testosterone. , 2005, Collegium antropologicum.

[11]  J. Langlois,et al.  Stereotype Directionality and Attractiveness Stereotyping: Is Beauty Good or is Ugly Bad? , 2006, Social cognition.

[12]  C. Scott,et al.  Influence of lips on the perception of malocclusion. , 2006, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[13]  Chiarella Sforza,et al.  Three-dimensional facial morphometry of attractive adolescent boys and girls. , 2007, Progress in orthodontics.

[14]  J. Mew Suggestions for forecasting and monitoring facial growth. , 1993, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[15]  F. Bookstein,et al.  Second to fourth digit ratio and face shape , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[16]  A. Kuijpers-Jagtman,et al.  Influence of panel composition on aesthetic evaluation of adolescent faces. , 2007, European journal of orthodontics.

[17]  S Peck,et al.  Skeletal asymmetry in esthetically pleasing faces. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[18]  S. Akyalcin,et al.  Smile esthetics: perception and comparison of treated and untreated smiles. , 2006, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[19]  H. Kiyak,et al.  Perceptions of dental professionals and laypersons to altered dental esthetics: asymmetric and symmetric situations. , 2006, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[20]  M. Bashour,et al.  History and Current Concepts in the Analysis of Facial Attractiveness , 2006, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[21]  Chiarella Sforza,et al.  Growth and aging of facial soft tissues: A computerized three‐dimensional mesh diagram analysis , 2003, Clinical anatomy.

[22]  Hans Pancherz,et al.  Skeletofacial morphology of attractive and nonattractive faces. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[23]  D. Giddon,et al.  The perception of children's computer-imaged facial profiles by patients, mothers and clinicians. , 2007, The Angle orthodontist.

[24]  Greg J. Huang,et al.  Methods to evaluate profile preferences for the anteroposterior position of the mandible. , 2006, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[25]  Farhad B Naini,et al.  The enigma of facial beauty: esthetics, proportions, deformity, and controversy. , 2006, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[26]  M. Bashour,et al.  An Objective System for Measuring Facial Attractiveness , 2006, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[27]  A. Kuijpers-Jagtman,et al.  Smile attractiveness. Self-perception and influence on personality. , 2007, The Angle orthodontist.