Tracking Story Reading in the Brain

Story comprehension is a rich and rapid phenomenon that requires multiple simultaneous processes (e.g. letter recognition, word understanding, sentence parsing...). Our goal is to study these complex processes in the brain by modeling the fMRI brain activity during story reading at a close to normal speed. This is a challenging goal, one reason being the coarse time-resolution of fMRI and another the lack of a comprehensive model of word meaning composition. Classically, fMRI has been used to localize brain areas that process specific elements of text processing (e.g. which areas are involved in syntactic processing) but not to model how the brain represents different instances of these elements (e.g. how do those areas represent different syntactic structures). We present here a generative model that predicts the fMRI activity created when subjects read a complex story where the words are presented in a serial manner, for 0.5 seconds each. Using this model, we performed an exploratory analysis in which we tested several types of story features (e.g. word length, syntax, semantics, story characters) to search for a good basis of features for story comprehension. We found different patterns of representation in the brain for different types of features. These patterns align with the predictions from the field. We tested the expressivity of our model using a classification task that decodes a passage of the story from a time segment of brain activity. We obtain a classification accuracy that is significantly higher than chance with p < 10−6. We show that we can indeed study multiple components of reading simultaneously in fMRI at a close to normal speed. Our approach has the advantage of being flexible: any feature of language can be added to the model and tested, and features can range from simple perceptual features, to compositional semantics, to higher order reasoning about narrative structure and story comprehension.

[1]  Jonathan R. Brennan Incrementally Dissociating Syntax and Semantics. , 2010 .

[2]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[3]  Stefan Pollmann,et al.  PyMVPA: a Python Toolbox for Multivariate Pattern Analysis of fMRI Data , 2009, Neuroinformatics.

[4]  Tom M. Mitchell,et al.  Selecting Corpus-Semantic Models for Neurolinguistic Decoding , 2012, *SEMEVAL.

[5]  Indrayana Rustandi,et al.  Modeling fMRI data generated by overlapping cognitive processes with unknown onsets using Hidden Process Models , 2009, NeuroImage.

[6]  Curt Burgess,et al.  Producing high-dimensional semantic spaces from lexical co-occurrence , 1996 .

[7]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  ECVP '07 Abstracts , 2007, Perception.

[8]  宮川 喜代江,et al.  英語から日本語への訳(11)松岡佑子訳 Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone , 2000 .

[9]  J. Gallant,et al.  Reconstructing Visual Experiences from Brain Activity Evoked by Natural Movies , 2011, Current Biology.

[10]  P. Cochat,et al.  Et al , 2008, Archives de pediatrie : organe officiel de la Societe francaise de pediatrie.

[11]  E. Demidenko,et al.  Mixed Models: Theory and Applications (Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics) , 2004 .

[12]  Tom M. Mitchell,et al.  Machine learning classifiers and fMRI: A tutorial overview , 2009, NeuroImage.

[13]  Trevor Hastie,et al.  The Elements of Statistical Learning , 2001 .

[14]  Beatrix Potter The Tale of Peter Rabbit: A Pop-up Adventure , 1902 .

[15]  Jeffrey M. Zacks,et al.  Reading Stories Activates Neural Representations of Visual and Motor Experiences , 2009, Psychological science.

[16]  Indrayana Rustandi,et al.  Predictive fMRI analysis for multiple subjects and multiple studies , 2010 .

[17]  Joakim Nivre,et al.  MaltParser: A Language-Independent System for Data-Driven Dependency Parsing , 2007, Natural Language Engineering.

[18]  R. Malach,et al.  Syntactic structure building in the anterior temporal lobe during natural story listening , 2012, Brain and Language.

[19]  Tom Michael Mitchell,et al.  Predicting Human Brain Activity Associated with the Meanings of Nouns , 2008, Science.

[20]  M. Just,et al.  Brain Activation Modulated by Sentence Comprehension , 1996, Science.

[21]  S. Bookheimer,et al.  Form and Content Dissociating Syntax and Semantics in Sentence Comprehension , 1999, Neuron.

[22]  Weijia Ni,et al.  Sentence complexity and input modality effects in sentence comprehension: an fMRI study , 2004, NeuroImage.

[23]  Tilo Kircher,et al.  Neural correlates of narrative shifts during auditory story comprehension , 2009, NeuroImage.

[24]  M. Just,et al.  Brain activation for reading and listening comprehension: An fMRI study of modality effects and individual differences in language comprehension. , 2009, Psychology & neuroscience.

[25]  R. Saxe Uniquely human social cognition , 2006, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[26]  Indrayana Rustandi,et al.  Hidden process models , 2006, ICML.

[27]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[28]  N. Tzourio-Mazoyer,et al.  Automated Anatomical Labeling of Activations in SPM Using a Macroscopic Anatomical Parcellation of the MNI MRI Single-Subject Brain , 2002, NeuroImage.

[29]  Tom M. Mitchell,et al.  Quantitative modeling of the neural representation of adjective-noun phrases to account for fMRI activation , 2009, ACL.

[30]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.