The interval for interference in conscious visual imagery

Three experiments are described that use dynamic visual noise (DVN) to interfere with words processed under visual and verbal processing instructions. In Experiment 1 DVN is presented to coincide with the encoding of the words or to coincide with the interval between encoding and recall. The results show that while DVN is a robust disruptor when it is applied during encoding to words processed under visual instruction, it has no effect during encoding when the words are processed under rote instruction. Moreover, DVN has no effect when it is applied during the retention interval, no matter what means are employed to encode the words. Experiment 2 extends these findings by again showing no effect of DVN during the retention interval, yet showing robust interference effects for visually processed words during recall. Finally, Experiment 3 demonstrates that the results of Experiments 1 and 2 cannot be explained by a difference in the time duration associated with application of DVN during the retention interval compared to during encoding and recall. Moreover, the differing decay functions for visually and verbally processed words during the intervals used in Experiment 3 suggest that any failure to cause interference is not because the two processing instructions resulted in words being retained in the same medium. The functions are consistent with word storage mechanisms reflecting appropriately verbal and visual properties. The results are discussed in terms of current models of visual working memory. It is argued that a full interpretation of the results requires a buffer mechanism as an important component of any model of visual working memory.

[1]  D. G. Payne,et al.  Hypermnesia: the role of repeated testing. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[2]  F. Attneave,et al.  Locational representation in imagery: a moving spot task. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  Ian H. Robertson,et al.  Personal Versus Extrapersonal Neglect: A Group Study of their Dissociation Using a Reliable Clinical Test , 1997, Cortex.

[4]  R. Logie,et al.  What the Eyes Perceive, The Brain Ignores: A Case of Pure Unilateral Representational Neglect , 1997, Cortex.

[5]  J. G. Quinn,et al.  Complexity factors in visuo‐spatial working memory , 2004, Memory.

[6]  A. Young,et al.  The executivevisuospatial sketchpad interface in euthymic bipolar disorder: implications for visuospatial working memory architecture , 2003 .

[7]  J. May,et al.  White Rose Consortium Eprints Repository Insensitivity of Visual Short-term Memory to Irrelevant Visual Information , 2022 .

[8]  Jean McConnell,et al.  Manipulation of Interference in the Passive Visual Store , 1999 .

[9]  R. Logie,et al.  Visuo-spatial working memory: Visual, spatial, or central executive? , 1991 .

[10]  Harry R. Speiser,et al.  Spatio-temporal working-memory and short-term object-location tasks use different memory mechanisms. , 2003, Acta psychologica.

[11]  D. Kavanagh,et al.  Effects of visuospatial tasks on desensitization to emotive memories. , 2001, The British journal of clinical psychology.

[12]  David A. Rettinger,et al.  How are visuospatial working memory, executive functioning, and spatial abilities related? A latent-variable analysis. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[13]  S. Kosslyn.  Image and mind , 1982 .

[14]  Alan D. Baddeley,et al.  Disruption of short-term memory by unattended speech : Implications for the structure of working memory , 1982 .

[15]  S. Kosslyn.  Image and Brain: The Resolution of the Imagery Debate , 1994, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[16]  Paul D. Bolls,et al.  I Can Hear You, but Can I See You? , 2002, Commun. Res..

[17]  M. Smyth,et al.  Movement imagery in rock climbing: patterns of interference from visual, spatial and kinaesthetic secondary tasks , 1998 .

[18]  A. Baddeley.  Recent developments in working memory , 1998, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[19]  A. Paivio,et al.  LEARNING OF ADJECTIVE-NOUN PAIRED ASSOCIATES AS A FUNCTION OF ADJECTIVE-NOUN WORD ORDER AND NOUN ABSTRACTNESS. , 1963, Canadian journal of psychology.

[20]  J G Quinn,et al.  Irrelevant Pictures in Visual Working Memory , 1996, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[21]  J. Jonides,et al.  Rehearsal in spatial working memory. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  B. R. Bugelski,et al.  Image as a mediator in one-trial paired-associate learning. , 1968 .

[23]  R. Logie,et al.  The bailiwick of visuo-spatial working memory: evidence from unilateral spatial neglect. , 1996, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[24]  Margaret Wilson,et al.  A visuospatial “phonological loop” in working memory: Evidence from American Sign Language , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[25]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Reification of phonological storage , 2003, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[26]  Alan D. Baddeley,et al.  Effects of Background Music on Phonological Short-Term Memory , 1989 .

[27]  R. Logie,et al.  Age-of-acquisition, imagery, concreteness, familiarity, and ambiguity measures for 1,944 words , 1980 .

[28]  M. Smyth,et al.  Space and Movement in Working Memory , 1990, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[29]  Pertti Saariluoma,et al.  Visuospatial and articulatory interference in chess players' information intake , 1992 .

[30]  E. Kemps,et al.  Complexity effects in visuo-spatial working memory: Implications for the role of long-term memory , 2001, Memory.

[31]  Hubert D. Zimmer,et al.  The Irrelevant Picture Effect in Visuo-Spatial Working Memory: Fact or Fiction? , 2002 .

[32]  J. Fisk,et al.  The role of the executive system in visuo-spatial memory functioning , 2003, Brain and Cognition.

[33]  Alan Baddeley,et al.  Disruption of Verbal Stm by Irrelevant Speech, Articulatory Suppression, and Manual Tapping: Do they have a Common Source? , 2003, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[34]  D. Pearson,et al.  Oculomotor Control and the Maintenance of Spatially and Temporally Distributed Events in Visuo-Spatial Working Memory , 2003, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[35]  A. Baddeley.  Is working memory still working? , 2001, The American psychologist.

[36]  J. G. Quinn,et al.  Cognitive Mechanisms of Visual Memories and Visual Images , 2003 .

[37]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Irrelevant tones produce an irrelevant speech effect : Implications for phonological coding in working memory , 1993 .

[38]  J. G. Quinn,et al.  Interference in Visual Working Memory , 2000, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[39]  Dylan Marc Jones.  The cognitive psychology of auditory distraction: The 1997 BPS Broadbent Lecture , 1999 .

[40]  Eva Bertha Kemps,et al.  Effects of Complexity on Visuo-spatial Working Memory , 1999 .

[41]  L. Groninger,et al.  Reminiscence, forgetting, and hypermnesia using face–name learning: Isolating the effects using recall and recognition memory measures , 2004, Memory.

[42]  M. D’Esposito.  Working memory. , 2008, Handbook of clinical neurology.

[43]  M. Erdelyi,et al.  Hypermnesia for pictures: Incremental memory for pictures but not words in multiple recall trials☆ , 1974 .

[44]  J. Annett.  Motor imagery: Perception or action? , 1995, Neuropsychologia.