Post-processing analysis of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions to detect 4 kHz-notch hearing impairment – a pilot study

Summary Background To identify a parameter to distinguish normal hearing from hearing impairment in the early stages. The parameter was obtained from transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs), overcoming the limitations of the usually adopted waveform descriptive parameters which may fail in standard clinical screenings. Material/Methods Audiometric examinations and TEOAE analysis were conducted on 15 normal ears and on 14 hearing-impaired ears that exhibited an audiometric notch around 4 kHz. TEOAE signals were analyzed through a multivariate technique to filter out the individual variability and to highlight the dynamic structure of the signals. The new parameter (named radius 2-dimension – RAD2D) was defined and evaluated for simulated TEOAE signals modeling a different amount of hearing impairment. Results Audiometric examinations indicated 14 ears as impaired-hearing (IH), while the TEOAE ILO92 whole reproducibility parameter (WWR) indicated as IH 7 signals out of 14 (50%). The proposed new parameter indicated as IH 9 signals out of 14 (64%), reducing the number of false negative cases of WWR. Conclusions In this preliminary study there is evidence that the new parameter RAD2D defines the topology and the quantification of the damage in the inner ear. The proposed protocol can be useful in hearing screenings to identify hearing impairments much earlier than conventional pure tone audiometry and TEOAE pass/fail test.

[1]  Miriam Furst,et al.  Noise‐Induced Otoacoustic Emission Loss With or Without Hearing Loss , 1995, Ear and hearing.

[2]  C Giguère,et al.  A computational model of the auditory periphery for speech and hearing research. I. Ascending path. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  Peter M Rabinowitz,et al.  Audiogram Notches in Noise-Exposed Workers , 2006, Ear and hearing.

[4]  N. Roskams,et al.  [European agency for safety and health at work]. , 2012, Archivos de prevencion de riesgos laborales.

[5]  Gaetano Paludetti,et al.  The monitoring role of otoacoustic emissions and oxidative stress markers in the protective effects of antioxidant administration in noise-exposed subjects: a pilot study. , 2009, Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research.

[6]  R. Sisto,et al.  Otoacoustic emission sensitivity to low levels of noise-induced hearing loss. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  D. Mills Determining the Cause of Hearing Loss: Differential Diagnosis Using a Comparison of Audiometric and Otoacoustic Emission Responses , 2006, Ear and hearing.

[8]  Deborah Imel Nelson,et al.  The global burden of occupational noise-induced hearing loss. , 2005, American journal of industrial medicine.

[9]  D. Balatsouras,et al.  Screening protocols for the prevention of occupational noise-induced hearing loss: the role of conventional and extended high frequency audiometry may vary according to the years of employment. , 2010, Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research.

[10]  R Probst,et al.  A review of otoacoustic emissions. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  A Giuliani,et al.  Revealing deterministic structures in click-evoked otoacoustic emissions. , 2000, Journal of applied physiology.

[12]  N. Panda,et al.  Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions , 2006, Indian journal of pediatrics.

[13]  Alfredo Colosimo,et al.  Human Acoustic fingerprints , 2008 .

[14]  Abdul-Latif Hamdan,et al.  Transient-Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions in a Group of Professional Singers Who Have Normal Pure-Tone Hearing Thresholds , 2008, Ear and hearing.

[15]  D. McBride,et al.  Audiometric notch as a sign of noise induced hearing loss , 2001, Occupational and environmental medicine.

[16]  M. Slade,et al.  Audiometric “Early Flags” for Occupational Hearing Loss , 2007, Journal of occupational and environmental medicine.

[17]  R. Piacentini,et al.  In vivo protective effect of ferulic acid against noise-induced hearing loss in the guinea-pig , 2010, Neuroscience.

[18]  P. Van cauwenberge,et al.  Sensitivity of transient evoked and distortion product otoacoustic emissions to the direct effects of noise on the human cochlea. , 1999, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[19]  Gabriella Tognola,et al.  Principal component analysis as a method to facilitate fast detection of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[20]  Diana Troiani,et al.  Antioxidant protection against acoustic trauma by coadministration of idebenone and vitamin E , 2008, Neuroreport.

[21]  Jürgen Kurths,et al.  Recurrence plots for the analysis of complex systems , 2009 .

[22]  R Sisto,et al.  On the detection of early cochlear damage by otoacoustic emission analysis. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  Dimitris Davilis,et al.  The efficacy of transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions in the detection of middle-ear pathology. , 2005, Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research.

[24]  C L Webber,et al.  Dynamical assessment of physiological systems and states using recurrence plot strategies. , 1994, Journal of applied physiology.

[25]  Christopher A Shera,et al.  Mechanisms of Mammalian Otoacoustic Emission and their Implications for the Clinical Utility of Otoacoustic Emissions , 2004, Ear and hearing.

[26]  A. Martini,et al.  New clinical insights for transiently evoked otoacoustic emission protocols. , 2009, Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research.

[27]  D. Balatsouras The evaluation of noise-induced hearing loss with distortion product otoacoustic emissions. , 2004, Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research.

[28]  Gaetano Paludetti,et al.  Water-soluble Coenzyme Q10 formulation (Q-ter) promotes outer hair cell survival in a guinea pig model of noise induced hearing loss (NIHL) , 2009, Brain Research.

[29]  Stefan Stenfelt,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article International Journal of Audiology towards Understanding the Specifics of Cochlear Hearing Loss: a Modelling Approach , 2022 .

[30]  R. Sweetow,et al.  Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions: Feasibility in the Nursery , 1996, Ear and hearing.

[31]  Bo Hua Hu,et al.  The Role of Oxidative Stress in Noise-Induced Hearing Loss , 2005, Ear and hearing.

[32]  Avi Ravid,et al.  Otoacoustic Emissions in Early Noise-Induced Hearing Loss , 2007, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[33]  P. Woodland,et al.  A computational model of the auditory periphery for speech and hearing research. II. Descending paths. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[34]  Gabriella Tognola,et al.  Time-frequency distributions of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions , 1997, Hearing Research.

[35]  Annelies Bockstael,et al.  Effectiveness of hearing protector devices in impulse noise verified with transiently evoked and distortion product otoacoustic emissions , 2008, International journal of audiology.

[36]  Stavros Korres,et al.  Correlation of transiently evoked otoacoustic emission measures to auditory thresholds. , 2004, Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research.

[37]  A. Martini,et al.  TEOAE recording protocols revised: data from adult subjects: Revision de protocolos de registro de TEOAE: informacion de sujetos adultos , 2003, International journal of audiology.

[38]  W Jesteadt,et al.  A comparison of transient-evoked and distortion product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[39]  F Grandori,et al.  Frequency-specific information from click evoked otoacoustic emissions in noise-induced hearing loss. , 1999, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[40]  M. Cullen,et al.  Impact of OSHA Final Rule—Recording Hearing Loss: An Analysis of an Industrial Audiometric Dataset , 2003, Journal of occupational and environmental medicine.

[41]  A. Giuliani,et al.  Comparison of transient otoacoustic emission responses from neonatal and adult ears. , 2002, Journal of applied physiology.

[42]  D. Kemp Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[43]  David J. Bartholomew The foundations of factor analysis , 1984 .

[44]  A. Fetoni,et al.  Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) in new-borns: normative data. , 1999, International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology.

[45]  A. Giuliani,et al.  Otoacoustic emissions at different click intensities: invariant and subject-dependent features. , 2003, Journal of applied physiology.

[46]  Transient evoked otoacoustic emission input/output function and cochlear reflectivity: experiment and model. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[47]  L Zheng,et al.  Synthesis and decomposition of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions based on an active auditory model. , 1999, IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering.

[48]  A. Giuliani,et al.  Recurrence Quantification Analysis and Principal Components in the Detection of Short Complex Signals , 1997, chao-dyn/9712017.