Environmental impacts and the most economically advantageous tender in public procurement

The “most economically advantageous tender,” as defined in the EUʼs public procurement directives, allows public purchasers to combine environmental aspects, price and other award criteria in decision making. The directives do not, however, determine how the environmental criteria should be built. Indeed, there could be different means to assess the “greenness” of competing tenders, and these various measurements of environmental impacts may lead to different assessments of the most economically advantageous tender. In this article, the determination of environmental award criteria is examined through a case study on a purchase of a goods transportation service, where the most economically advantageous tender is calculated by life cycle assessment and the environmental cost calculation method suggested by the EU, and compared to the results gained by the purchaserʼs equation. Also the contribution of the weighting for the “green” purchasing decision is discussed.

[1]  Mike Hoxley,et al.  Purchasing UK public sector property and construction professional services: competition v quality , 2001 .

[2]  Gordana Petkovic,et al.  Environmental impact from the use of recycled materials in road construction: method for decision-making in Norway , 2004 .

[3]  Maria Zarkadoula,et al.  Training urban bus drivers to promote smart driving: A note on a Greek eco-driving pilot program , 2007 .

[4]  P Eskola,et al.  Life-cycle impacts of the use of industrial by-products in road and earth construction. , 2001, Waste management.

[5]  B. Kayis,et al.  The relative importance of tender evaluation and contractor selection criteria , 2010 .

[6]  Eva Sterner.  ‘Green procurement’ of buildings: a study of Swedish clients' considerations , 2002 .

[7]  Jennifer Cooper,et al.  Life cycle impact assessment weights to support environmentally preferable purchasing in the United States. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[8]  Ricardo Mateus,et al.  Full disclosure of tender evaluation models: Background and application in Portuguese public procurement , 2010 .

[9]  Tsong Ho Chen,et al.  AN ECONOMIC APPROACH TO PUBLIC PROCUREMENT , 2008 .

[10]  M. Hauschild,et al.  Life cycle assessment of disposal of residues from municipal solid waste incineration: recycling of bottom ash in road construction or landfilling in Denmark evaluated in the ROAD-RES model. , 2007, Waste management.

[11]  Charlotte Leire.  Increasing the environmental and social sustainability in corporate purchasing: Practices and tools , 2009 .

[12]  Renetta Siemens,et al.  A Review and Critical Evaluation of Selected Greener Public Purchasing Programmes and Policies , 2003 .

[13]  Sirpa Kurppa,et al.  Developing benchmarks for consumer-oriented life cycle assessment-based environmental information on products, services and consumption patterns , 2007 .

[14]  Adam C. Faruk,et al.  Analyzing, Mapping, and Managing Environmental Impacts along Supply Chains , 2001 .

[15]  Erik Kärrman,et al.  Environmental systems analysis of the use of bottom ash from incineration of municipal waste for road construction , 2006 .

[16]  Thomas Heck,et al.  Country-specific damage factors for air pollutants , 2001 .

[17]  Tender Evaluation and Award Methodologies in Public Procurement , 2011 .

[18]  Alice Pereira,et al.  Contribution of life cycle assessment: global atmospheric emissions for motorway infrastructures , 1998 .

[19]  M. Huijbregts,et al.  European characterization factors for human health damage of PM10 and ozone in life cycle impact assessment , 2008 .

[20]  Frank Boons,et al.  Assessing the relationship between economic and ecological performance: Distinguishing system levels and the role of innovation , 2009 .

[21]  J. Kreissig,et al.  Life cycle assessment of PVC in product optimisation and green procurement – fact-based decisions towards sustainable solutions , 2005 .

[22]  Göran Finnveden,et al.  Life Cycle Approach in the Procurement Process: The Case of Defence Materiel (9 pp) , 2006 .