Development of a Side-Impact (Gy) Neck Injury Criterion for Use in Aircraft and Vehicle Safety Evaluation

OCCUPATIONAL APPLICATIONS In this study, a lateral impact (Gy accelerative input), upper-neck, multi-axial, neck injury criterion is developed. This criterion could be used to evaluate the safety of U.S. Air Force ejection systems incorporating helmet-mounted displays or other applications where neck injury risk from side impact occurs (e.g., automotive and civilian fixed-wing or rotary-wing aircraft). Development of the criterion was motivated by military aviation, which increasingly incorporates head-supported mass and an expanded pilot population, including smaller pilots (to 47 kg), raising concerns for pilot safety during ejection. Neck injury criteria based on risk functions constructed with human subject and postmortem human subject data allow system designers to quantify the injury risk and design acceptably safe systems. A maximum allowable value for the criterion applicable to U.S. Air Force ejection aircraft is proposed to limit neck injury risk to a 5% probability of moderate injury. However, the underlying risk function allows practitioners to customize the criterion for their desired level of injury risk and injury classification. TECHNICAL ABSTRACT Background: Neck injury remains a concern in ejection seat–equipped military aircraft with the growing use of helmet-mounted displays (HMDs) worn for entire mission durations, as well as in the automotive and civilian aircraft domains. Existing U.S. Department of Defense criteria are overly complex and not clearly tied to injury risk and thus require improvement. Purpose: This study developed a lateral (Gy) impact, upper neck injury criterion for use in the design and test of U.S. Department of Defense escape systems and HMDs. Methods: A multi-axial lateral impact risk function, referred to as MANIC(Gy), was constructed using the survival analysis of a data set that combined human subject (N = 56) and postmortem human (N = 9) data. The human subject data were analyzed to assess criterion sensitivity to anthropometric factors. Additionally, a risk function was applied to quantify the risk associated with changes in HMD mass and acceleration input. Results: A lateral impact (Gy), upper neck injury criterion is proposed, which yields a 5% risk of Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) 2 or greater injury at a criterion value of 0.48 (95% confidence intervals of 0.28 and 0.67, respectively). At an injury level of AIS 3 or greater, a risk function was generated that yields a 5% risk at a criterion value of 0.53 (95% confidence intervals of 0.24 and 0.82, respectively). Conclusions: This initial multi-axial risk function could be applied to quantify the risk of neck injury posed by lateral acceleration. Criterion values were correlated with body mass and related anthropometric factors, indicating that the critical values incorporated in this study may require improvement. This same criterion may be useful for analyzing side impact safety in other vehicle systems (e.g., automotive and civilian fixed wing or rotary wing aircraft).

[1]  Akira Nakamura Ejection experience 1956-2004 in Japan: an epidemiological study. , 2007, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[2]  Claire C. Gordon,et al.  1995 U.S. Navy/Marine Corps Matched Male and Female Anthropometric Eligible Pilot Databases. , 1997 .

[3]  C. E. Rash,et al.  Helmet-mounted Displays: Sensation, Perception, and Cognition Issues , 2009 .

[4]  David W. Hosmer,et al.  Applied Survival Analysis: Regression Modeling of Time-to-Event Data , 2008 .

[5]  Kennerly Digges,et al.  Injury Patterns in Near-Side Collisions , 2000 .

[6]  C. Perry,et al.  Human and manikin head/neck response to +Gz acceleration when encumbered by helmets of various weights. , 1994, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[7]  Narayan Yoganandan,et al.  Physical effects of ejection on the head-neck complex: demonstration of a cadaver model. , 2009, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[8]  Narayan Yoganandan,et al.  Lateral neck injury assessments in side impact using post mortem human subject tests. , 2011, Annals of advances in automotive medicine. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine. Annual Scientific Conference.

[9]  Chris E Perry,et al.  Development of an updated tensile neck injury criterion. , 2014, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[10]  Erik G. Takhounts,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF IMPROVED INJURY CRITERIA FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF ADVANCED AUTOMOTIVE RESTRAINT SYSTEMS - II , 1999 .

[11]  Judith D. Goldberg,et al.  Applied Survival Analysis , 1999, Technometrics.

[12]  John R. Buhrman,et al.  An Analysis of Vertebral Stress and BMD During +Gz Impact Accelerations , 2007 .

[13]  Hattie C Cutcliffe,et al.  How few? Bayesian statistics in injury biomechanics. , 2012, Stapp car crash journal.

[14]  Michael E. Miller,et al.  Neck injury criteria formulation and injury risk curves for the ejection environment: a pilot study. , 2013, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[15]  Mj Kuiken,et al.  38TH ANNUAL PROCEEDINGS - ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF AUTOMOTIVE MEDICINE , 1994 .

[16]  Glenn R. Paskoff,et al.  Ejection injury to the spine in small aviators: sled tests of manikins vs. post mortem specimens. , 2009, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[17]  P Lövsund,et al.  Life-threatening and disabling injuries in car-to-car side impacts--implications for development of protective systems. , 1993, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[18]  Matthew E Lewis,et al.  Survivability and injuries from use of rocket-assisted ejection seats: analysis of 232 cases. , 2006, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[19]  Scott R. Lucas,et al.  A new neck injury criterion in combined vertical/frontal crashes with head supported mass , 2006 .