Integration of genomics, high throughput drug screening, and personalized xenograft models as a novel precision medicine paradigm for high risk pediatric cancer

ABSTRACT Pediatric high grade gliomas (HGG) are primary brain malignancies that result in significant morbidity and mortality. One of the challenges in their treatment is inter- and intra-tumoral heterogeneity. Precision medicine approaches have the potential to enhance diagnostic, prognostic and/or therapeutic information. In this case study we describe the molecular characterization of a pediatric HGG and the use of an integrated approach based on genomic, in vitro and in vivo testing to identify actionable targets and treatment options. Molecular analysis based on WGS performed on initial and recurrent tumor biopsies revealed mutations in TP53, TSC1 and CIC genes, focal amplification of MYCN, and copy number gains in SMO and c-MET. Transcriptomic analysis identified increased expression of MYCN, and genes involved in sonic hedgehog signaling proteins (SHH, SMO, GLI1, GLI2) and receptor tyrosine kinase pathways (PLK, AURKA, c-MET). HTS revealed no cytotoxic efficacy of SHH pathway inhibitors while sensitivity was observed to the mTOR inhibitor temsirolimus, the ALK inhibitor ceritinib, and the PLK1 inhibitor BI2536. Based on the integrated approach, temsirolimus, ceritinib, BI2536 and standard therapy temozolomide were selected for further in vivo evaluation. Using the PDX animal model (median survival 28 days) we showed significant in vivo activity for mTOR inhibition by temsirolimus and BI2536 (median survival 109 and 115.5 days respectively) while ceritinib and temozolomide had only a moderate effect (43 and 75.5 days median survival respectively). This case study demonstrates that an integrated approach based on genomic, in vitro and in vivo drug efficacy testing in a PDX model may be useful to guide the management of high risk pediatric brain tumor in a clinically meaningful timeframe.

[1]  A. Letai,et al.  Functional precision cancer medicine—moving beyond pure genomics , 2017, Nature Medicine.

[2]  Stuart J. Andrews,et al.  Implementation of next generation sequencing into pediatric hematology-oncology practice: moving beyond actionable alterations , 2016, Genome Medicine.

[3]  David T. W. Jones,et al.  Next-generation personalised medicine for high-risk paediatric cancer patients - The INFORM pilot study. , 2016, European journal of cancer.

[4]  Z. Ram,et al.  Clinical utility and treatment outcome of comprehensive genomic profiling in high grade glioma patients , 2016, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[5]  Stefan M. Pfister,et al.  Next-generation sequencing in routine brain tumor diagnostics enables an integrated diagnosis and identifies actionable targets , 2016, Acta Neuropathologica.

[6]  B. Crompton,et al.  Multicenter Feasibility Study of Tumor Molecular Profiling to Inform Therapeutic Decisions in Advanced Pediatric Solid Tumors: The Individualized Cancer Therapy (iCat) Study. , 2016, JAMA oncology.

[7]  Tao Wang,et al.  Diagnostic Yield of Clinical Tumor and Germline Whole-Exome Sequencing for Children With Solid Tumors. , 2016, JAMA oncology.

[8]  M. Roussel,et al.  Medulloblastoma Genotype Dictates Blood Brain Barrier Phenotype. , 2016, Cancer cell.

[9]  M. Cole,et al.  Strategically targeting MYC in cancer , 2016, F1000Research.

[10]  J. Khan,et al.  MultiDimensional ClinOmics for Precision Therapy of Children and Adolescent Young Adults with Relapsed and Refractory Cancer: A Report from the Center for Cancer Research , 2016, Clinical Cancer Research.

[11]  Roland Eils,et al.  Atypical Teratoid/Rhabdoid Tumors Are Comprised of Three Epigenetic Subgroups with Distinct Enhancer Landscapes. , 2016, Cancer cell.

[12]  A. Vignoli,et al.  Glioblastoma multiforme in a child with tuberous sclerosis complex , 2015, American journal of medical genetics. Part A.

[13]  Nallasivam Palanisamy,et al.  Integrative Clinical Sequencing in the Management of Refractory or Relapsed Cancer in Youth. , 2015, JAMA.

[14]  R. Prayson,et al.  Glioblastoma in the setting of tuberous sclerosis , 2015, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.

[15]  K. Ohshima,et al.  Anaplastic lymphoma kinase protein expression, genetic abnormalities, and phosphorylation in soft tissue tumors: Phosphorylation is associated with recurrent metastasis. , 2015, Oncology reports.

[16]  Benjamin Pichette,et al.  Pharmacological inhibition of Polo-like kinase 1 (PLK1) by BI-2536 decreases the viability and survival of hamartin and tuberin deficient cells via induction of apoptosis and attenuation of autophagy , 2015, Cell cycle.

[17]  U. Tabori,et al.  Advances in the Management of Paediatric High-Grade Glioma , 2014, Current Oncology Reports.

[18]  M. McKeown,et al.  Therapeutic strategies to inhibit MYC. , 2014, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine.

[19]  Chris Jones,et al.  Unique genetic and epigenetic mechanisms driving paediatric diffuse high-grade glioma , 2014, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[20]  P. Varlet,et al.  Vemurafenib in pediatric patients with BRAFV600E mutated high‐grade gliomas , 2014, Pediatric blood & cancer.

[21]  A. Gajjar,et al.  Complete clinical regression of a BRAF V600E-mutant pediatric glioblastoma multiforme after BRAF inhibitor therapy , 2014, BMC Cancer.

[22]  M. Ueno,et al.  Loss of Tsc1 accelerates malignant gliomagenesis when combined with oncogenic signals. , 2014, Journal of biochemistry.

[23]  D. Haussler,et al.  The Somatic Genomic Landscape of Glioblastoma , 2013, Cell.

[24]  David T. W. Jones,et al.  Signatures of mutational processes in human cancer , 2013, Nature.

[25]  L. Chirieac,et al.  Tsc1-Tp53 loss induces mesothelioma in mice, and evidence for this mechanism in human mesothelioma , 2013, Oncogene.

[26]  Robert P. Carson,et al.  Heterozygous inactivation of tsc2 enhances tumorigenesis in p53 mutant zebrafish , 2013, Disease Models & Mechanisms.

[27]  J. Barnholtz-Sloan,et al.  CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2007-2011. , 2012, Neuro-oncology.

[28]  A. Børresen-Dale,et al.  Mutational Processes Molding the Genomes of 21 Breast Cancers , 2012, Cell.

[29]  David T. W. Jones,et al.  Driver mutations in histone H3.3 and chromatin remodelling genes in paediatric glioblastoma , 2012, Nature.

[30]  A. J. Valente,et al.  Regulation of PI 3-K, PTEN, p53, and mTOR in Malignant and Benign Tumors Deficient in Tuberin. , 2011, Genes & cancer.

[31]  Daniel J Brat,et al.  Temozolomide in the treatment of high-grade gliomas in children: a report from the Children's Oncology Group. , 2011, Neuro-oncology.

[32]  M. Nicholas,et al.  Targeted therapy in the treatment of malignant gliomas , 2009, OncoTargets and therapy.

[33]  E. Henske,et al.  Hamartin, the tuberous sclerosis complex 1 gene product, interacts with polo-like kinase 1 in a phosphorylation-dependent manner. , 2006, Human molecular genetics.

[34]  B. Scheithauer,et al.  Malignant tumors of the kidney, brain, and soft tissues in children and young adults with the tuberous sclerosis complex , 1998, Cancer.

[35]  H. Takimoto,et al.  Glioblastoma following radiotherapy in a patient with tuberous sclerosis. , 1998, Neurologia medico-chirurgica.

[36]  R. Harruff,et al.  Glioblastoma multiforme with tuberous sclerosis. Report of a case. , 1980, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[37]  Jennifer M. Brown TUBEROSE SCLEROSIS WITH MALIGNANT ASTROCYTOMA , 1975, The Medical journal of Australia.

[38]  Y. Qi,et al.  Tumor location, but not H3.3K27M, significantly influences the blood–brain-barrier permeability in a genetic mouse model of pediatric high-grade glioma , 2015, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[39]  A. von Deimling,et al.  Molecular analysis of the TSC1 and TSC2 tumour suppressor genes in sporadic glial and glioneuronal tumours , 2000, Human Genetics.

[40]  F1000Research , 2022 .