Entrepreneurial In-Migration and Neoendogenous Rural Development.

The social, cultural, and economic transitions in rural areas across the globe lead us to critique the traditional “top-down” or “bottom-up” distinction as being outdated for contemporary rural policy. In Europe and the United States in particular, high rates of counterurbanization heighten the need for new ways of thinking about rural development. To address this, we describe the emergence of neoendogenous development theories in the United Kingdom and elucidate further on the economic implications of this approach for rural development. In particular, we examine the role of local and extralocal networks and population flows as facilitators of neoendogenous development based on our independent studies in northeast England and northern Scotland. This approach highlights the importance of diverse forms of capital in rural economies and examines the role of social networks in the utilization of these resources. In-migrant business owners are a valuable research focus as they provide a link between the “local” and the “extralocal,” allowing greater insight into the creation and evolution of network ties in relation to economic activity in rural areas.

[1]  M. Warner,et al.  Rural transformations and rural policies in the US and UK , 2012 .

[2]  Embeddedness or Escapism? Rural Perceptions and Economic Development in Cornwall and Northumberland , 2011 .

[3]  G. Bosworth,et al.  Home‐based business sectors in the rural economy , 2010 .

[4]  G. Bosworth Commercial Counterurbanisation: An Emerging Force in Rural Economic Development , 2010 .

[5]  G. Bosworth Education, mobility and rural business development , 2009 .

[6]  J. Flora Review Essay: Whither Rural Community Development? , 2009 .

[7]  Andrew Errington,et al.  Measuring the determinants of relative economic performance of rural areas , 2009 .

[8]  T. Besser Changes in small town social capital and civic engagement , 2009 .

[9]  G. Bosworth Entrepreneurial in-migrants and economic development in rural England , 2008 .

[10]  S. Marquart-Pyatt,et al.  Trust, the Democratic Process, and Involvement in a Rural Community. , 2008 .

[11]  J. Atterton The ‘Strength of Weak Ties’: Social Networking by Business Owners in the Highlands and Islands of Scotland , 2007 .

[12]  A. Stockdale,et al.  Migration: Pre-Requisite for Rural Economic Regeneration?. , 2006 .

[13]  C. Kalantaridis,et al.  In-migrant entrepreneurship in rural England: beyond local embeddedness , 2006 .

[14]  R. Boyd,et al.  Moral Sentiments and Material Interests: The Foundations of Cooperation in Economic Life , 2006 .

[15]  David Morris,et al.  Restructuring the Automotive Industry in the English West Midlands , 2005 .

[16]  J. Atterton [PhD Thesis] Networking in the Highlands and Islands of Scotland: A Case Study of the Embeddedness of Firms in Three Small Towns , 2005 .

[17]  M. Hess ‘Spatial’ relationships? Towards a reconceptualization of embedded ness , 2004 .

[18]  Jan L. Flora,et al.  The Social Capital Paradigm: Bridging Across Disciplines , 2003 .

[19]  Hans Westlund,et al.  Local Social Capital and Entrepreneurship , 2003 .

[20]  I. Terluin,et al.  Differences in economic development in rural regions of advanced countries: an overview and critical analysis of theories , 2003 .

[21]  P. Davidsson,et al.  The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs , 2000 .

[22]  Johannison Bengt,et al.  The institutional embeddedness of local inter-firm networks: a leverage for business creation , 2002 .

[23]  Alistair R. Anderson,et al.  The effects of embeddedness on the entrepreneurial process , 2002 .

[24]  Jonathan Murdoch,et al.  Networks — a new paradigm of rural development? , 2000 .

[25]  Elizabeth Chell,et al.  Networking, entrepreneurship and microbusiness behaviour , 2000 .

[26]  David J. North,et al.  The Innovativeness and Growth of Rural SMEs During the 1990s , 2000 .

[27]  C. Ray Further ideas about local rural development : trade, production and cultural capital , 2000 .

[28]  K. Burnett Local Heroics: Reflecting on Incomers and Local Rural Development Discourses in Scotland , 1998 .

[29]  Phil A. Silva,et al.  Early failure in the labor market : Childhood and adolescent predictors of unemployment in the transition to adulthood , 1998 .

[30]  N. Ward,et al.  Reconfiguring rural development in the UK: Objective 5b and the new rural governance , 1998 .

[31]  James N. Baron,et al.  Resources and Relationships: Social Networks and Mobility in the Workplace , 1997 .

[32]  Päivi Oinas,et al.  On the socio-spatial embeddedness of business firms , 1997 .

[33]  P. Cloke Rural Life-Styles: Material Opportunity, Cultural Experience, and How Theory Can Undermine Policy* , 1996 .

[34]  B. Uzzi,et al.  The Sources and Consequences of Embeddedness for the Economic Performance of Organizations: The Network Effect , 1996 .

[35]  Stuart A. Rosenfeld Does cooperation enhance competitiveness? Assessing the impacts of inter-firm collaboration , 1996 .

[36]  E. Saraceno Recent trends in rural development and their conceptualisation , 1994 .

[37]  J. Coleman,et al.  Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[38]  Z. Belhachmi The unfinished assignment: Educating Moroccan women for development , 1987 .

[39]  Mark S. Granovetter Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.