Photoelectric factor, formation true resistivity, and formation water saturation are three functional parameters of a hydrocarbon reservoir that could provide invaluable data for reservoir characterization and formation evaluation. The present study proposes an improved strategy for making a quantitative formulation between conventional well log data and the mentionewd parameters. At the first stage of this study, three architectures of artificial neural networks, including generalized regression neural network, radial basis neural network, and Bayesian regulation backpropagation neural network, were employed to predict the aforementioned parameters from conventional well log data. Consequently, a committee neural network was constructed by virtue of hybrid genetic algorithm-pattern search technique. The propounded committee neural network combines the results of generalized regression neural network, radial basis neural network, and Bayesian regulation backpropagation neural network to improve the accuracy of final prediction. It assigns a weight factor to each of the individual artificial neural networks indicating its contribution in overall prediction. A set of data points was used for model construction and another set was employed to assess the model performance. The results showed that integration of artificial neural networks using the concept of committee machine could improve the precision of target prediction, although each of the artificial neural networks has performed adequately for prediction of photoelectric factor and formation true resistivity. The values obtained for formation water saturation are not as accurate as results obtained for photoelectric factor and formation true resistivity, although the correlation coefficient between measured and predicted values for formation water saturation is higher.
[1]
Muhammad M. Saggaf,et al.
A fuzzy logic approach for the estimation of facies from wire-line logs
,
2003
.
[2]
Amanda J. C. Sharkey,et al.
On Combining Artificial Neural Nets
,
1996,
Connect. Sci..
[3]
S. Hyakin,et al.
Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation
,
1994
.
[4]
Alejandro Sánchez,et al.
Reservoir characterization using intelligent seismic inversion
,
2005
.
[5]
Shahab D. Mohaghegh,et al.
Virtual-Intelligence Applications in Petroleum Engineering: Part 1—Artificial Neural Networks
,
2000
.
[6]
Chang-Hsu Chen,et al.
A committee machine with empirical formulas for permeability prediction
,
2006,
Comput. Geosci..
[7]
P. M. Wong,et al.
Modeling Porosity Distribution in the A'nan Oilfield: Use of Geological Quantification, Neural Networks, and Geostatistics
,
1999
.
[8]
John H. Holland,et al.
Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence
,
1992
.
[9]
Toby Darling.
QUICKLOOK LOG INTERPRETATION
,
2005
.
[10]
Masoud Nikravesh,et al.
Soft computing and intelligent data analysis in oil exploration
,
2003
.
[11]
Toby Darling,et al.
Well Logging and Formation Evaluation
,
2005
.
[12]
Ali Mohebbi,et al.
Estimating the initial pressure, permeability and skin factor of oil reservoirs using artificial neural networks
,
2006
.