Choice behavior and the accessibility of the reinforcer.

In Experiment 1, matching of relative response rates to relative rates of reinforcement was obtained in concurrent variable-interval schedules when the absolute values of the two concurrent variable-interval schedules varied from 6 sec and 12 sec to 600 sec and 1200 sec. Increases in the duration of the changeover delay, however, produced decreases in the relative response rates and, consequently, some deviation from matching. In Experiment 2, matching of relative response rates to the relative duration of the reinforcer failed to occur when the equal variable-interval schedules arranging access to the two different reinforcer durations (1.5 and 6 sec) were varied in size from concurrent variable-interval 10-sec schedules to concurrent variable-interval 600-sec schedules.

[1]  R J HERRNSTEIN,et al.  Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement. , 1961, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[2]  A C CATANIA,et al.  Concurrent performances: a baseline for the study of reinforcement magnitude. , 1963, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[3]  R. Herrnstein SECONDARY REINFORCEMENT AND RATE OF PRIMARY REINFORCEMENT. , 1964, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[4]  E F SEGAL,et al.  A RAPID PROCEDURE FOR GENERATING RANDOM REINFORCEMENT INTERVALS ON VI AND VR TAPES. , 1964, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[5]  A J Neuringer,et al.  Effects of reinforcement magnitude on choice and rate of responding. , 1967, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[6]  R. Shull,et al.  Changeover delay and concurrent schedules: some effects on relative performance measures. , 1967, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[7]  A. Brownstein,et al.  Some effects of relative reinforcement rate and changeover delay in response-independent concurrent schedules of reinforcement. , 1968, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[8]  D. Stubbs,et al.  Concurrent responding with fixed relative rate of reinforcement. , 1969, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[9]  H. Rachlin,et al.  Response rate as a function of amount of reinforcement for a signalled concurrent response. , 1969, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[10]  S. Schroeder,et al.  REINFORCEMENT OF EYE MOVEMENT WITH CONCURRENT SCHEDULES1 , 1969 .

[11]  W M Baum,et al.  Choice as time allocation. , 1969, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[12]  E. Fantino Choice and rate of reinforcement. , 1969, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[13]  Robert L. Ten Eyck,et al.  Effects of rate of reinforcement-time upon concurrent operant performance , 1970 .

[14]  R. Herrnstein On the law of effect. , 1970, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[15]  E. Fantino,et al.  Choice, rate of reinforcement, and the changeover delay. , 1970, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[16]  N Squires,et al.  A model for choice in simple concurrent and concurrent-chains schedules. , 1971, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[17]  A J Brownstein,et al.  Concurrent schedules of response-independent reinforcement: duration of a reinforcing stimulus. , 1971, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[18]  H Rachlin,et al.  On the tautology of the matching law. , 1971, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.