Needs of private forest owners in the context of changing political systems: Lithuania as a case study

During the first half of the 20th century the Baltic States were independent democratic nations where private forest ownership was practiced. After annexation to the Soviet Union, individuals in the Baltic States lost their ownership rights and collective ownership was introduced. Currently, after the break-up of the Soviet Union, the land restitution process in the forest sector is coming to an end and the ownership pattern as well as tenure rights are settled. A survey was undertaken to investigate the current state of the private forest sector in general, and the needs and expectations of private forest owners (PFO). Results of the study indicated that for private forest owners their forests first of all provide aesthetic and environmental protection values. Lithuanian PFOs lack information of forests and forest management, face extensive bureaucracy and need help in protecting their forests from fires, diseases and timber thieves.

[1]  L. Ross,et al.  Environmental policy in China , 1988 .

[2]  E. Harrow.  Community Conservation From Concept to Practice , 2005 .

[3]  L. Loennstedt,et al.  Goals and cutting decisions of private small forest owners , 1989 .

[4]  D. North.  Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance: Economic performance , 1990 .

[5]  A. Kallas.  Public forest policy making in post-Communist Estonia , 2002 .

[6]  H. Karppinen.  Values and objectives of non-industrial private forest owners in Finland. , 1998 .

[7]  Jeffrey Sayer,et al.  Research to integrate productivity enhancement, environmental protection, and human development. , 2002 .

[8]  Bernard J. Lewis,et al.  Decision-making Framework for Nonindustrial Private Forest Owners: An Application in the Missouri Ozarks , 1981, Journal of Forestry.

[9]  J. Bliss,et al.  Identifying NIPF Management Motivations with Qualitative Methods , 1989, Forest Science.

[10]  L. Hämet-Ahti.  The boreal zone and its biotic subdivision , 1981 .

[11]  T. Ahti,et al.  Vegetation zones and their sections in northwestern Europe , 1968 .

[12]  J. W. Thomas,et al.  Evolving forestry and rural development beliefs at midpoint and close of the 20th century , 2001 .

[13]  C. Ziegler.  Environmental Policy in the USSR , 1987 .

[14]  T. L. Brown,et al.  Factors Affecting Response Rates to Natural Resource - Focused Mail Surveys: Empirical Evidence of Declining Rates Over Time , 2003 .

[15]  Michael Quinn Patton,et al.  How to use qualitative methods in evaluation , 1987 .

[16]  Lars Lönnstedt.  Calculating non‐industrial private forest owners’ cuttings , 1998 .

[17]  Lars Lönnstedt,et al.  Non-industrial Private Forest Owners' Risk Preferences , 2000 .

[18]  James W. Altschuld,et al.  Planning and Conducting Needs Assessments: A Practical Guide , 1995 .

[19]  J. Bliss,et al.  Foundations of Cross-Boundary Cooperation: Resource Management at the Public–Private Interface , 2004 .