Recombinant Proteins for Assembling as Nano- and Micro-Scale Materials for Drug Delivery: A Host Comparative Overview

By following simple protein engineering steps, recombinant proteins with promising applications in the field of drug delivery can be assembled in the form of functional materials of increasing complexity, either as nanoparticles or nanoparticle-leaking secretory microparticles. Among the suitable strategies for protein assembly, the use of histidine-rich tags in combination with coordinating divalent cations allows the construction of both categories of material out of pure polypeptide samples. Such molecular crosslinking results in chemically homogeneous protein particles with a defined composition, a fact that offers soft regulatory routes towards clinical applications for nanostructured protein-only drugs or for protein-based drug vehicles. Successes in the fabrication and final performance of these materials are expected, irrespective of the protein source. However, this fact has not yet been fully explored and confirmed. By taking the antigenic RBD domain of the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein as a model building block, we investigated the production of nanoparticles and secretory microparticles out of the versions of recombinant RBD produced by bacteria (Escherichia coli), insect cells (Sf9), and two different mammalian cell lines (namely HEK 293F and Expi293F). Although both functional nanoparticles and secretory microparticles were effectively generated in all cases, the technological and biological idiosyncrasy of each type of cell factory impacted the biophysical properties of the products. Therefore, the selection of a protein biofabrication platform is not irrelevant but instead is a significant factor in the upstream pipeline of protein assembly into supramolecular, complex, and functional materials.

[1]  Xuekui Liu,et al.  A self-assembling CXCR4-targeted pyroptosis nanotoxin for melanoma therapy. , 2023, Biomaterials science.

[2]  E. Vázquez,et al.  Recombinant vaccines in 2022: a perspective from the cell factory , 2022, Microbial Cell Factories.

[3]  E. Vázquez,et al.  Protein scaffolds in human clinics. , 2022, Biotechnology advances.

[4]  E. Vázquez,et al.  An In Silico Methodology That Facilitates Decision Making in the Engineering of Nanoscale Protein Materials , 2022, International journal of molecular sciences.

[5]  E. Vázquez,et al.  The Poly-Histidine Tag H6 Mediates Structural and Functional Properties of Disintegrating, Protein-Releasing Inclusion Bodies , 2022, Pharmaceutics.

[6]  E. Vázquez,et al.  The spectrum of building block conformers sustains the biophysical properties of clinically-oriented self-assembling protein nanoparticles , 2022, Science China Materials.

[7]  E. Vázquez,et al.  Time-Prolonged Release of Tumor-Targeted Protein–MMAE Nanoconjugates from Implantable Hybrid Materials , 2022, Pharmaceutics.

[8]  N. Solin,et al.  Protein nanofibrils and their use as building blocks of sustainable materials , 2021, RSC advances.

[9]  E. Vázquez,et al.  Self-assembling protein nanocarrier for selective delivery of cytotoxic polypeptides to CXCR4+ head and neck squamous cell carcinoma tumors , 2021, Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B.

[10]  E. Vázquez,et al.  Biofabrication of functional protein nanoparticles through simple His-tag engineering , 2021, ACS sustainable chemistry & engineering.

[11]  E. Vázquez,et al.  Insights on the emerging biotechnology of histidine-rich peptides. , 2021, Biotechnology advances.

[12]  J. Sierra,et al.  Antineoplastic effect of a diphtheria toxin-based nanoparticle targeting acute myeloid leukemia cells overexpressing CXCR4. , 2021, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[13]  Tao Hu,et al.  Purification and characterization of the receptor‐binding domain of SARS‐CoV‐2 spike protein from Escherichia coli , 2021, Engineering in life sciences.

[14]  E. Vázquez,et al.  In Vitro Fabrication of Microscale Secretory Granules , 2021, Advanced Functional Materials.

[15]  J. Sierra,et al.  Specific Cytotoxic Effect of an Auristatin Nanoconjugate Towards CXCR4+ Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Cells , 2021, International journal of nanomedicine.

[16]  C. Erkey,et al.  Aerogels in drug delivery: From design to application. , 2021, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[17]  E. Vázquez,et al.  Engineering the Performance of Artificial Inclusion Bodies Built of Catalytic β-Galactosidase , 2021 .

[18]  E. Vázquez,et al.  Ion-dependent slow protein release from in vivo disintegrating micro-granules , 2021, Drug delivery.

[19]  Matthew J. Harrington,et al.  Natural load-bearing protein materials , 2020, Progress in Materials Science.

[20]  R. Eritja,et al.  Design and engineering of tumor-targeted, dual-acting cytotoxic nanoparticles. , 2020, Acta biomaterialia.

[21]  R. Riek,et al.  The three-dimensional structure of human β-endorphin amyloid fibrils , 2020, Nature Structural & Molecular Biology.

[22]  E. Vázquez,et al.  Divalent Cations: A Molecular Glue for Protein Materials. , 2020, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[23]  M. Habal,et al.  BMP Application as Grafting Materials for Bone Regeneration in the Craniofacial Surgery: Current Application and Future Directions by an RCT Analysis. , 2020, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[24]  E. Vázquez,et al.  Release of functional fibroblast growth factor-2 from artificial inclusion bodies. , 2020, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[25]  G. Striedner,et al.  PEI-Mediated Transient Transfection of High Five Cells at Bioreactor Scale for HIV-1 VLP Production , 2020, Nanomaterials.

[26]  Yuquan Wei,et al.  A vaccine targeting the RBD of the S protein of SARS-CoV-2 induces protective immunity , 2020, Nature.

[27]  F. Gòdia,et al.  Development of a non-viral platform for rapid virus-like particle production in Sf9 cells. , 2020, Journal of biotechnology.

[28]  A. Detsi,et al.  Nanosystems for the Encapsulation of Natural Products: The Case of Chitosan Biopolymer as a Matrix , 2020, Pharmaceutics.

[29]  E. Vázquez,et al.  Engineering Protein Nanoparticles Out from Components of the Human Microbiome. , 2020, Small.

[30]  P. Colombo,et al.  Evaluation of the drug release kinetics in assembled modular systems based on the Dome Matrix technology. , 2020, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[31]  Xiao-Xia Xia,et al.  Synthetic biology for protein-based materials. , 2020, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[32]  M. Butler,et al.  Mammalian cell culture for production of recombinant proteins: A review of the critical steps in their biomanufacturing. , 2020, Biotechnology advances.

[33]  E. Vázquez,et al.  Nanostructured toxins for the selective destruction of drug resistant human CXCR4+ colorectal cancer stem cells. , 2020, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[34]  Hansoo Park,et al.  Engineering and Functionalization of Gelatin Biomaterials: From Cell Culture to Medical Applications. , 2020, Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews.

[35]  E. Vázquez,et al.  Engineering Secretory Amyloids for Remote and Highly Selective Destruction of Metastatic Foci , 2019, Advanced materials.

[36]  A. Shrivastava,et al.  Recent Developments in Bioprocessing of Recombinant Proteins: Expression Hosts and Process Development , 2019, Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol..

[37]  E. Vázquez,et al.  Artificial Inclusion Bodies for Clinical Development , 2019, Advanced science.

[38]  Hsin-Yun Hsu,et al.  Artificial peptide-controlled protein release of Zn2+-triggered, self-assembled histidine-tagged protein microparticle. , 2019, Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces.

[39]  M. Kostiainen,et al.  Highly ordered protein cage assemblies: A toolkit for new materials. , 2019, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology.

[40]  P. Kocbek,et al.  Electrospun nanofibers for customized drug-delivery systems , 2019, Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology.

[41]  R. Petrovich,et al.  Selectable high‐yield recombinant protein production in human cells using a GFP/YFP nanobody affinity support , 2018, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[42]  Brigitte Gasser,et al.  Systems biotechnology for protein production in Pichia pastoris , 2017, FEMS yeast research.

[43]  A. Hayes,et al.  Toxicity of nanomaterials found in human environment , 2017 .

[44]  Yubin Cao,et al.  Toxicity assessment of nanoparticles in various systems and organs , 2017 .

[45]  Saikat Ghosh,et al.  Amyloid formation of growth hormone in presence of zinc: Relevance to its storage in secretory granules , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[46]  Xiajuan Zou,et al.  Enhanced production of secretory glycoprotein VSTM1-v2 with mouse IgGκ signal peptide in optimized HEK293F transient transfection. , 2016, Journal of bioscience and bioengineering.

[47]  Heather A. Moniz,et al.  High Yield Expression of Recombinant Human Proteins with the Transient Transfection of HEK293 Cells in Suspension. , 2015, Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE.

[48]  X. Daura,et al.  Bottom‐Up Instructive Quality Control in the Biofabrication of Smart Protein Materials , 2015, Advanced materials.

[49]  Steffen Loft,et al.  Nanomaterial translocation–the biokinetics, tissue accumulation, toxicity and fate of materials in secondary organs–a review , 2015, Critical reviews in toxicology.

[50]  N. Ferrer-Miralles,et al.  A novel bio-functional material based on mammalian cell aggresomes , 2015, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[51]  M. Pezzotti,et al.  A comparative analysis of recombinant protein expression in different biofactories: bacteria, insect cells and plant systems. , 2015, Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE.

[52]  E. Vázquez,et al.  Recombinant protein materials for bioengineering and nanomedicine. , 2014, Nanomedicine.

[53]  J. Veciana,et al.  In vivo architectonic stability of fully de novo designed protein-only nanoparticles. , 2014, ACS nano.

[54]  Mario Pezzotti,et al.  Comparative Evaluation of Recombinant Protein Production in Different Biofactories: The Green Perspective , 2014, BioMed research international.

[55]  P. Thibault,et al.  Engineering the Pattern of Protein Glycosylation Modulates the Thermostability of a GH11 Xylanase* , 2013, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[56]  Antonio Villaverde,et al.  Unconventional microbial systems for the cost-efficient production of high-quality protein therapeutics. , 2013, Biotechnology advances.

[57]  A. Chilkoti,et al.  Injectable protease-operated depots of glucagon-like peptide-1 provide extended and tunable glucose control , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[58]  E. Vázquez,et al.  Non-amyloidogenic peptide tags for the regulatable self-assembling of protein-only nanoparticles. , 2012, Biomaterials.

[59]  B. Arey,et al.  The Role of Glycosylation in Receptor Signaling , 2012 .

[60]  Rachel Chen Bacterial expression systems for recombinant protein production: E. coli and beyond. , 2012, Biotechnology advances.

[61]  David L. Kaplan,et al.  Protein-based composite materials , 2012 .

[62]  David Farrar,et al.  Bone adhesives for trauma surgery: A review of challenges and developments , 2012 .

[63]  E. Vázquez,et al.  Integrated approach to produce a recombinant, his‐tagged human α‐galactosidase a in mammalian cells , 2011, Biotechnology progress.

[64]  David Eisenberg,et al.  In Brief , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[65]  Kai Griebenow,et al.  Effects of glycosylation on the stability of protein pharmaceuticals. , 2009, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[66]  J. Cole,et al.  Recombinant protein production: a comparative view on host physiology. , 2009, New biotechnology.

[67]  Antonio Villaverde,et al.  Protein folding and conformational stress in microbial cells producing recombinant proteins: a host comparative overview , 2008 .

[68]  E. Nieschlag Testosterone treatment comes of age: new options for hypogonadal men , 2006, Clinical endocrinology.

[69]  Hungwen Chen,et al.  Improvement of glycosylation in insect cells with mammalian glycosyltransferases. , 2003, Journal of biotechnology.

[70]  D. Andersen,et al.  Recombinant protein expression for therapeutic applications. , 2002, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[71]  F. Marshall,et al.  Protein-Protein Interaction and Not Glycosylation Determines the Binding Selectivity of Heterodimers between the Calcitonin Receptor-like Receptor and the Receptor Activity-modifying Proteins* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[72]  Fanling Meng,et al.  Metal-Mediated Nanobody Assemblies as Potent Alleviator of Human Islet Amyloid Polypeptide Aggregation , 2023, Materials Chemistry Frontiers.

[73]  M. Habal,et al.  Bone Morophogenetic Protein Application as Grafting Materials for Bone Regeneration in Craniofacial Surgery: Current Application and Future Directions. , 2021, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[74]  Anoop Arunagiri,et al.  Protein Nanofibrils as Storage Forms of Peptide Drugs and Hormones. , 2019, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[75]  E. Vázquez,et al.  Assembly of histidine-rich protein materials controlled through divalent cations. , 2019, Acta biomaterialia.

[76]  Xiangmei Chen,et al.  One-month zero-order sustained release and tumor eradication after a single subcutaneous injection of interferon alpha fused with a body-temperature-responsive polypeptide. , 2018, Biomaterials science.

[77]  Martin Dragosits,et al.  Influence of growth temperature on the production of antibody Fab fragments in different microbes: A host comparative analysis , 2011, Biotechnology progress.

[78]  R. Dwek,et al.  Glycosylation: heterogeneity and the 3D structure of proteins. , 1997, Critical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology.