The dynamic microstructure of speech production: semantic interference built on the fly.

We present 4 experiments investigating dynamic and flexible aspects of semantic activation spread during speech planning. In a semantic blocking paradigm, pictures of objects were presented in categorically homogeneous blocks consisting of semantic category members (e.g., foods), in blocks consisting of seemingly unrelated objects that could potentially be integrated into a common theme (e.g., fishing trip), or in heterogeneous blocks consisting of entirely unrelated objects. In Experiment 1 we observed a classic semantic interference effect for the categorically homogeneous condition but no effect for the thematically homogeneous condition. In Experiment 2 the blocks were preceded once by visually presented title words. When titles were presented that referred to the semantic category or theme of the block, interference was observed not only in the categorically homogeneous condition but also in the thematically homogeneous condition. The ad hoc semantic interference effects for thematic relations were replicated with a different set of materials in Experiments 3 and 4. These observations reveal the dynamic nature of the speech production system, shaped by context and formations of flexible ad hoc categories and semantic relations.

[1]  Markus Kiefer,et al.  Top-down modulation of unconscious 'automatic'processes: A gating framework , 2007 .

[2]  S. Anthony,et al.  Strategies for generating multiple instances of common and ad hoc categories. , 1998, Memory.

[3]  Lawrence W. Barsalou,et al.  Deriving Categories to Achieve Goals , 1991 .

[4]  N. C. Waugh,et al.  The Pathology of Memory , 1969 .

[5]  M. Coltheart,et al.  Cumulative semantic inhibition in picture naming: experimental and computational studies , 2006, Cognition.

[6]  J. Jescheniak,et al.  Semantic and phonological activation in noun and pronoun production. , 2001, Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory and Cognition.

[7]  Albert Costa,et al.  On the categorical nature of the semantic interference effect in the picture-word interference paradigm , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[8]  Randi C. Martin,et al.  Semantic and phonological codes interact in single word production. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[9]  Albert Costa,et al.  Level of categorisation effect: A novel effect in the picture-word interference paradigm , 2003 .

[10]  Gary M. Oppenheim,et al.  The dark side of incremental learning: A model of cumulative semantic interference during lexical access in speech production , 2010, Cognition.

[11]  Herbert Schriefers,et al.  Semantic competition between hierarchically related words during speech planning , 2005, Memory & cognition.

[12]  Tudor S. G. Jones,et al.  Theories of Memory , 1925 .

[13]  Albert Costa,et al.  A further look at semantic context effects in language production: The role of response congruency , 2006 .

[14]  Colin M. Macleod.  Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review. , 1991, Psychological bulletin.

[15]  Melanie Vitkovitch,et al.  The Effects of Distractor Words on Naming Pictures at the Subordinate Level , 1999 .

[16]  Richard R. Rosinski,et al.  Picture-word interference is semantically based. , 1977 .

[17]  Lawrence W Barsalou,et al.  Simulation, situated conceptualization, and prediction , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[18]  J. Bransford,et al.  Comprehension and semantic flexibility , 1974 .

[19]  W. Glaser,et al.  The time course of picture-word interference. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  P. Malik.  On equivalence. , 2003, The Canadian journal of cardiology.

[21]  Alissa Melinger,et al.  Semantic context effects in language production: A swinging lexical network proposal and a review , 2009 .

[22]  C D Frith,et al.  The functional roles of prefrontal cortex in episodic memory. II. Retrieval. , 1998, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[23]  L. Barsalou.  Flexibility, Structure, and Linguistic Vagary in Concepts: Manifestations of a Compositional System of Perceptual Symbols , 2019, Theories of Memory.

[24]  Eva Belke.  Effects of working memory load on lexical-semantic encoding in language production , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[25]  Antje S. Meyer,et al.  Exploring the time course of lexical access in language production : Picture word interference studies , 1990 .

[26]  T. Shallice,et al.  The functional roles of prefrontal cortex in episodic memory. I. Encoding. , 1998, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[27]  T H Carr,et al.  Semantic priming and repetition priming from masked words: evidence for a center-surround attentional mechanism in perceptual recognition. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[28]  Stephen J. Lupker,et al.  The semantic nature of response competition in the picture-word interference task , 1979 .

[29]  IM Sabineschulte.  An Empirical Characterisation of Response Types in German Association Norms ⋆ ⋆ , 2008 .

[30]  Padraic Monaghan,et al.  Proceedings of the 23rd annual conference of the cognitive science society , 2001 .

[31]  Alissa Melinger,et al.  Dismissing lexical competition does not make speaking any easier: A rejoinder to Mahon and Caramazza (2009) , 2009 .

[32]  E. Chrysikou.  When shoes become hammers: Goal-derived categorization training enhances problem-solving performance. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[33]  L. Barsalou,et al.  Ad hoc categories , 1983, Memory & cognition.

[34]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Visual Recognition As Soon as You Know It Is There, You Know What It Is , 2022 .

[35]  W. Heij,et al.  Categorical interference and associative priming in picture naming. , 1990 .

[36]  Sabine Schulte im Walde,et al.  An Empirical Characterisation of Response Types in German Association Norms , 2008 .

[37]  M. Schwartz,et al.  Semantic interference during blocked-cyclic naming: Evidence from aphasia , 2006 .

[38]  J. Segui,et al.  Semantic and Associative Priming in Picture Naming , 2000, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[39]  S. Dennis,et al.  What is free association and what does it measure? , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[40]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  Kinds of Kinds: Sources of Category Coherence , 2001 .

[41]  L. Barsalou,et al.  The situated nature of concepts. , 2006, The American journal of psychology.

[42]  J. Kroll,et al.  Category Interference in Translation and Picture Naming: Evidence for Asymmetric Connections Between Bilingual Memory Representations , 1994 .

[43]  L. Barsalou.  Ideals, central tendency, and frequency of instantiation as determinants of graded structure in categories. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[44]  L. Barsalou.  Context-independent and context-dependent information in concepts , 1982, Memory & cognition.

[45]  Richard M. Young,et al.  Proceedings of the European Cognitive Science conference , 2003 .

[46]  Denis Fize,et al.  Speed of processing in the human visual system , 1996, Nature.

[47]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  Interactions Between Perceptual and Conceptual Learning , 2000 .

[48]  D. Spence,et al.  Lexical co-occurrence and association strength , 1990 .

[49]  L. Barsalou.  Grounded cognition. , 2008, Annual review of psychology.

[50]  Troy A. Smith,et al.  Dynamics of thematic activation in recognition testing , 2010, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[51]  M. Heil,et al.  Automatic Semantic Activation Is No Myth , 2004, Psychological science.

[52]  W. Glaser,et al.  Context effects in stroop-like word and picture processing. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[53]  Geoffrey Underwood,et al.  SEMANTIC INTERFERENCE FROM UNATTENDED PRINTED WORDS , 1976 .

[54]  Patrick Colm Hogan,et al.  The Cambridge encyclopedia of the language sciences , 2011 .

[55]  Wido La Heij,et al.  Semantic interference, orthographic facilitation, and their interaction in naming tasks. , 1995 .

[56]  Alissa Melinger,et al.  When bees hamper the production of honey: lexical interference from associates in speech production. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[57]  Mutsumi Imai,et al.  On the equivalence of superordinate concepts , 1996, Cognition.

[58]  Tinka Welke,et al.  Investigating dimensional organization in scripts using the pupillary response. , 2007, Psychophysiology.

[59]  Rasha Abdel Rahman,et al.  Electrophysiological Chronometry of Semantic Context Effects in Language Production , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[60]  W. Levelt,et al.  Effects of semantic context in the naming of pictures and words , 2001, Cognition.

[61]  A. Meyer,et al.  Refractory effects in picture naming as assessed in a semantic blocking paradigm , 2005, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.