Estimation of lignocellulosic biomass pyrolysis product yields using artificial neural networks

Abstract As the push towards more sustainable ways to produce energy and chemicals intensifies, efforts are needed to refine and optimize the systems that can give an answer to these needs. In the present work, the use of neural networks as modelling tools for lignocellulosic biomass pyrolysis main products yields estimation was evaluated. In order to achieve this, the most relevant compositional and reaction parameters for lignocellulosic biomass pyrolysis were reviewed and their effect over the main products yields was assessed. Based on relevant literature data, a database was set up, containing parameters and experimental results from 32 published studies for a total of 482 samples, including both fast and slow pyrolysis experiments performed on a heterogeneous collection of lignocellulosic biomasses. The parameters that in the database configured as best predictors for the solid, liquid and gaseous products were determined through preliminary tests and were then used to build reduced models, one for each of the main products, which use five parameters instead of the full set for the estimation of yields. The procedures included hyperparameter optimizations steps. The performances of these reduced models were compared to those of the ones obtained using the full set of parameters as inputs by using the root mean squared error (RMSE) as metric. For both the char and gas products, the best results were consistently achieved by the reduced versions of the network (RMSE 5.1 wt% ar and 5.6 wt% ar respectively), while for the liquid product the best result was given by the full network (RMSE 6.9 wt% ar) indicating substantial value in proper selection of the input features. In general, the char models were the best performing ones. Additional models for the liquid and gas product featuring char as additional input to the system were also devised and obtained better performance (RMSE 5.5 wt% ar and 4.9 wt% ar respectively) compared to the original ones. Models based on single studies were also included in order to showcase both the capabilities of the tool and the challenges that arise when trying to build a generalizable model of this kind. Overall, artificial neural networks were shown to be an interesting tool for the construction of setup-unspecific biomass pyrolysis product yield models. The obstacles standing currently in the way of a more accurate modelling of the system were highlighted, along with certain literature discrepancies, which hinder reliable quantitative comparison of experimental conditions and results among separate studies.

[1]  Hazzim F. Abbas,et al.  Effects of pyrolysis parameters on hydrogen formations from biomass: a review , 2014 .

[2]  Anastasia Zabaniotou,et al.  Experimental study of pyrolysis for potential energy, hydrogen and carbon material production from lignocellulosic biomass , 2008 .

[3]  Gérard Dreyfus,et al.  Neural networks - methodology and applications , 2005 .

[4]  Dongpu Cao,et al.  Levenberg–Marquardt Backpropagation Training of Multilayer Neural Networks for State Estimation of a Safety-Critical Cyber-Physical System , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[5]  S. Şensöz,et al.  Influence of particle size on the pyrolysis of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.): fuel properties of bio-oil , 2000 .

[6]  A. Demirbas,et al.  Yields of hydrogen-rich gaseous products via pyrolysis from selected biomass samples , 2001 .

[7]  Paul T. Williams,et al.  The influence of temperature and heating rate on the slow pyrolysis of biomass , 1996 .

[8]  A. Bridgwater,et al.  An overview of fast pyrolysis of biomass , 1999 .

[9]  Q. Wang,et al.  Pyrolysis products from industrial waste biomass based on a neural network model , 2016 .

[10]  B. Chalermsinsuwan,et al.  Application of artificial neural network for kinetic parameters prediction of biomass oxidation from biomass properties , 2017 .

[11]  Claes Brage,et al.  Guideline for sampling and analysis of tar and particles in biomass producer gases , 2008 .

[12]  S. Yorgun Fixed-Bed Pyrolysis of Miscanthus x giganteus: Product Yields and Bio-Oil Characterization , 2003 .

[13]  Jimmy Ba,et al.  Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization , 2014, ICLR.

[14]  S. Arumugasamy,et al.  Feedforward Neural Network Modeling of Biomass Pyrolysis Process for Biochar Production , 2015 .

[15]  Paul T. Williams,et al.  Pyrolysis of waste biomass: investigation of fast pyrolysis and slow pyrolysis process conditions on product yield and gas composition , 2013 .

[16]  Young-Kwon Park,et al.  Comparison of biochar properties from biomass residues produced by slow pyrolysis at 500°C. , 2013, Bioresource technology.

[17]  Paul T. Williams,et al.  Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Formation from the Pyrolysis/Gasification of Lignin at Different Reaction Conditions , 2014 .

[18]  Zhong-yang Luo,et al.  Lignocellulosic biomass pyrolysis mechanism: A state-of-the-art review , 2017 .

[19]  Ayhan Demirbas,et al.  Effects of temperature and particle size on bio-char yield from pyrolysis of agricultural residues , 2004 .

[20]  Amin Bemani,et al.  Application of MLP-ANN strategy to predict higher heating value of biomass in terms of proximate analysis , 2017 .

[21]  Sang-Woo Park,et al.  Effects of pyrolysis temperature on changes in fuel characteristics of biomass char , 2012 .

[22]  Nurgül Özbay,et al.  Bio‐oil production from rapid pyrolysis of cottonseed cake: product yields and compositions , 2006 .

[23]  Jianhua Yan,et al.  Comparison of ANN (MLP), ANFIS, SVM, and RF models for the online classification of heating value of burning municipal solid waste in circulating fluidized bed incinerators. , 2017, Waste management.

[24]  Y. Rogaume,et al.  Evolution of Aromatic Tar Composition in Relation to Methane and Ethylene from Biomass Pyrolysis-Gasification , 2011 .

[25]  Ilhan Mutlu,et al.  Activation energy prediction of biomass wastes based on different neural network topologies , 2018 .

[26]  Akwasi A. Boateng,et al.  Pyrolysis of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) harvested at several stages of maturity , 2006 .

[27]  A. Pütün,et al.  Pyrolysis of two different biomass samples in a fixed-bed reactor combined with two different catalysts , 2006 .

[28]  A. Gómez-Barea,et al.  Characterization and prediction of biomass pyrolysis products , 2011 .

[29]  Jillian L. Goldfarb,et al.  Improved prediction of higher heating value of biomass using an artificial neural network model based on proximate analysis. , 2017, Bioresource technology.

[30]  W. Tsai,et al.  Fast pyrolysis of rice husk: Product yields and compositions. , 2007, Bioresource technology.

[31]  Dražen Lončar,et al.  Artificial neural network modelling approach for a biomass gasification process in fixed bed gasifiers. , 2014 .

[32]  K. Kaygusuz,et al.  Bio-oil production from fast pyrolysis of maple fruit (acer platanoides samaras): product yields , 2017 .

[33]  B. Dabir,et al.  EFFECTS OF HEATING RATE AND PARTICLE SIZE ON THE PRODUCTS YIELDS FROM RAPID PYROLYSIS OF BEECH-WOOD , 1996 .

[34]  Young‐Kwon Park,et al.  Slow pyrolysis of rice straw: analysis of products properties, carbon and energy yields. , 2014, Bioresource technology.

[35]  José L. Figueiredo,et al.  Pyrolysis kinetics of lignocellulosic materials—three independent reactions model , 1999 .

[36]  Robert B. Mitchell,et al.  Chemical composition and response to dilute-acid pretreatment and enzymatic saccharification of alfalfa, reed canarygrass, and switchgrass , 2006 .

[37]  J. T. Freire,et al.  Fitting performance of artificial neural networks and empirical correlations to estimate higher heating values of biomass , 2016 .

[38]  Jocelyn Sietsma,et al.  Creating artificial neural networks that generalize , 1991, Neural Networks.

[39]  A. Bridgwater,et al.  Overview of Fast Pyrolysis of Biomass for the Production of Liquid Fuels , 1997 .

[40]  S. Şensöz,et al.  Pyrolysis of safflower (Charthamus tinctorius L.) seed press cake: part 1. The effects of pyrolysis parameters on the product yields. , 2008, Bioresource technology.

[41]  M. Küçük,et al.  Biomass pyrolysis in a fixed-bed reactor: Effects of pyrolysis parameters on product yields and characterization of products , 2014 .

[42]  P. Arun,et al.  Performance prediction of fluidised bed gasification of biomass using experimental data-based simulation models , 2013 .

[43]  Prabir Basu,et al.  Biomass Gasification and Pyrolysis: Practical Design and Theory , 2010 .

[44]  Sedat Keleş,et al.  Pyrolysis of Woody Biomass for Sustainable Bio-oil , 2011 .

[45]  Paul T. Williams,et al.  Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) formation from the pyrolysis of different municipal solid waste fractions. , 2015, Waste management.

[46]  Daniel Serrano,et al.  Tar prediction in bubbling fluidized bed gasification through artificial neural networks , 2020 .

[47]  Bo Xiao,et al.  Influence of Temperature on the Formation of Oil from Pyrolyzing Palm Oil Wastes in a Fixed Bed Reactor , 2007 .

[48]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Deep Learning , 2015, Nature.

[49]  Abolfazl Sajadi Noushabadi,et al.  Estimation of biomass higher heating value (HHV) based on the proximate analysis: Smart modeling and correlation , 2019 .

[50]  M. Becidan,et al.  Products distribution and gas release in pyrolysis of thermally thick biomass residues samples , 2007 .

[51]  S. Kelley,et al.  Artificial neural network based modeling for the prediction of yield and surface area of activated carbon from biomass , 2019, Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining.

[52]  Y. Rogaume,et al.  Synthesis gas production by biomass pyrolysis: Effect of reactor temperature on product distribution , 2009 .

[53]  Ehsan Mesbahi,et al.  Artificial neural networks: fundamentals , 2003 .

[54]  Tsuyoshi Murata,et al.  {m , 1934, ACML.

[55]  Jianren Fan,et al.  Predictive single-step kinetic model of biomass devolatilization for CFD applications: A comparison study of empirical correlations (EC), artificial neural networks (ANN) and random forest (RF) , 2019, Renewable Energy.

[56]  Bundit Fungtammasan,et al.  Effects of temperature and holding time during torrefaction on the pyrolysis behaviors of woody biomass , 2011 .

[57]  Martin T. Hagan,et al.  Neural network design , 1995 .

[58]  I A Basheer,et al.  Artificial neural networks: fundamentals, computing, design, and application. , 2000, Journal of microbiological methods.

[59]  W. Jong,et al.  PAH sampling and quantification from woody biomass fast pyrolysis in a pyroprobe reactor with a modified tar sampling system , 2020, Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis.

[60]  S. Arumugasamy,et al.  An experimental and modelling approach to produce biochar from banana peels through pyrolysis as potential renewable energy resources , 2019, Modeling Earth Systems and Environment.

[61]  A. Çaǧlar,et al.  The prediction of potential energy and matter production from biomass pyrolysis with artificial neural network , 2017 .

[62]  S. Sánchez-Delgado,et al.  Predicting the effect of bed materials in bubbling fluidized bed gasification using artificial neural networks (ANNs) modeling approach , 2020 .

[63]  P. Mondal,et al.  Pyrolysis of pine needles: effects of process parameters on products yield and analysis of products , 2018, Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry.

[64]  B. Chalermsinsuwan,et al.  Artificial neural network model for the prediction of kinetic parameters of biomass pyrolysis from its constituents , 2017 .

[65]  M. Alma,et al.  Pyrolysis of laurel (Laurus nobilis L.) extraction residues in a fixed-bed reactor: Characterization of bio-oil and bio-char , 2010 .

[66]  Danna Zhou,et al.  d. , 1840, Microbial pathogenesis.

[67]  Hasan Sadikoglu,et al.  Comparison of the different artificial neural networks in prediction of biomass gasification products , 2019, International Journal of Energy Research.

[68]  J. Arauzo,et al.  Some Peculiarities of Conventional Pyrolysis of Several Agricultural Residues in a Packed Bed Reactor , 2007 .

[69]  Maurício Bezerra de Souza,et al.  Neural Network Based Modeling and Operational Optimization of Biomass Gasification Processes , 2012 .

[70]  Gang Xiao,et al.  Gasification characteristics of MSW and an ANN prediction model. , 2009, Waste management.

[71]  J. C. Bruno,et al.  Artificial neural network models for biomass gasification in fluidized bed gasifiers. , 2013 .

[72]  V. Strezov,et al.  Lignocellulosic biomass pyrolysis: A review of product properties and effects of pyrolysis parameters , 2016 .

[73]  W. Jong,et al.  The impact of dry torrefaction on the fast pyrolysis behavior of ash wood and commercial Dutch mixed wood in a pyroprobe , 2018, Fuel Processing Technology.

[74]  S. Yaman,et al.  Prediction of Calorific Value of Biomass from Proximate Analysis , 2017 .

[75]  C. Blasi,et al.  Biomass Screening for the Production of Furfural via Thermal Decomposition , 2010 .

[76]  Saleh Al Arni,et al.  Comparison of slow and fast pyrolysis for converting biomass into fuel , 2017 .

[77]  Saptarshi Das,et al.  Artificial neural network based modelling approach for municipal solid waste gasification in a fluidized bed reactor , 2016, Waste management.

[78]  W. Jong,et al.  Fast devolatilization characteristics of ‘low cost’ biomass fuels, wood and reed. Potential feedstock for gasification , 2016 .

[79]  Hongliang Cao,et al.  Prediction of biochar yield from cattle manure pyrolysis via least squares support vector machine intelligent approach. , 2016, Bioresource technology.

[80]  Chunfei Wu,et al.  Effect of interactions of biomass constituents on polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) formation during fast pyrolysis , 2014 .

[81]  Amin Bemani,et al.  Application of MLP-ANN as a novel predictive method for prediction of the higher heating value of biomass in terms of ultimate analysis , 2018, Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects.

[82]  J. Caballero,et al.  Flash pyrolysis of Klason lignin in a Pyroprobe 1000 , 1993 .

[83]  D. Baruah,et al.  Artificial neural network based modeling of biomass gasification in fixed bed downdraft gasifiers , 2017 .

[84]  Prabir Basu,et al.  Chapter 7 – Gasification Theory , 2013 .

[85]  Mehdi Khashei,et al.  An artificial neural network (p, d, q) model for timeseries forecasting , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[86]  Nitish Srivastava,et al.  Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting , 2014, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[87]  Y Shen,et al.  Simulation of biomass gasification with a hybrid neural network model. , 2001, Bioresource technology.

[88]  Paul T. Williams,et al.  Influence of temperature on the products from the flash pyrolysis of biomass , 1996 .

[89]  A. Demirbas,et al.  Effect of temperature on pyrolysis products from four nut shells , 2006 .

[90]  Dilek Angın,et al.  Effect of pyrolysis temperature and heating rate on biochar obtained from pyrolysis of safflower seed press cake. , 2013, Bioresource technology.

[91]  J V Tu,et al.  Advantages and disadvantages of using artificial neural networks versus logistic regression for predicting medical outcomes. , 1996, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[92]  Jose Martin Z. Maningo,et al.  Application of Artificial Neural Networks in prediction of pyrolysis behavior for algal mat (LABLAB) biomass , 2018, 2018 IEEE 10th International Conference on Humanoid, Nanotechnology, Information Technology,Communication and Control, Environment and Management (HNICEM).

[93]  C. Blasi,et al.  Effects of Particle Size and Density on the Packed-Bed Pyrolysis of Wood , 2013 .

[94]  C. Muraleedharan,et al.  Assessment of producer gas composition in air gasification of biomass using artificial neural network model , 2018 .

[95]  D. Shonnard,et al.  Effects of torrefaction temperature and acid pretreatment on the yield and quality of fast pyrolysis bio-oil from rice straw , 2017 .

[96]  Young-Kwon Park,et al.  Characteristics of biochar produced from slow pyrolysis of Geodae-Uksae 1. , 2013, Bioresource technology.