Collaborative design: a learner-centered library planning approach

Purpose Information commons were introduced into libraries in the early 1990s. Now universities are building library learning commons and campus learning spaces. This paper sets out to present a participatory library (re)design approach for collaborative planning “for and with” faculty teachers, student learners, and campus stakeholders. Design/methodology/approach Collaborative design (co‐design) employs user‐centric investigations to produce products, applications, and environments aimed at advancing learning, sustaining communication, and building relationships. Examples from California Polytechnic State University and San Jose State University in California, USA, suggest the efficacy of this inclusive, learner‐centered (re)design approach for library facilities, services, and systems. Findings Inviting and enabling user input from the start offers a fruitful planning approach in which campus librarians, stakeholders, and beneficiaries “learn their way” to appropriate library (re)design decisions. Also, user involvement in information gathering and interpretation activities initiates the interactive relationships necessary for continuous improvement. Practical implications Collaborative design (co‐design) yields sustained interaction with user beneficiaries and campus stakeholders. It changes how library staff members think and what they think about, concurrent with enhancing libraries' appeal and value. Originality/value In development since 2002, the highly participatory design approach reflects theoretical and applied insights from researchers in Europe, Australia, and North America who have worked with US library practitioners to develop user‐centric processes for advancing organizational learning and enhancing user efficacy. Its practical application to planning for library learning commons and learning spaces contributes to the small but important literature on user‐centered library (re)design.

[1]  Donald Beagle,et al.  Conceptualizing an information commons , 1999 .

[2]  C. Windham Father Google and Mother IM: Confessions of a Net Gen Learner , 2005 .

[3]  Francis Howard,et al.  Digital learning objects: a local response to the California State University system initiative , 2009 .

[4]  Diana G. Oblinger Leading the Transition from Classrooms to Learning Spaces , 2005 .

[5]  Mary M. Somerville,et al.  Collaborative co-design: The Cal Poly Digital Teaching Library user centric approach , 2006 .

[6]  Mary M. Somerville,et al.  From Information Commons to Learning Commons and learning spaces: an evolutionary context , 2008 .

[7]  Stephen C. Ehrmann,et al.  The future of the learning space: Breaking out of the box , 2005 .

[8]  M. Prensky Engage Me or Enrage Me. What Today’s Learners Demand , 2005 .

[9]  Anita Mirijamdotter,et al.  Soft Systems Methodology results transform professional roles in the digital teaching library , 2005 .

[10]  C. Bruce Seven faces of information literacy , 1997 .

[11]  Mary M. Somerville,et al.  Rethinking what we do and how we do it: Systems thinking strategies for library leadership , 2005 .

[12]  Mary M. Somerville A collaborative co-design approach for student-centric learning commons , 2007 .

[13]  Mary M. Somerville,et al.  Toward lifelong ‘knowledge making’: Faculty development for student learning in the Cal Poly learning commons , 2006 .

[14]  Anita Mirijamdotter,et al.  Systems Thinking and Information Literacy: Elements of a Knowledge Enabling Workplace Environment , 2006, Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06).

[15]  Susan L. Kendall,et al.  Collaborative Strategic Planning , 2008 .

[16]  Reg Roberts,et al.  The evolving landscape of the learning commons , 2007 .

[17]  C. Maybee Undergraduate Perceptions of Information Use: The Basis for Creating User-Centered Student Information Literacy Instruction , 2006 .

[18]  Robert E. Dugan,et al.  Libraries Designed for Learning , 2004 .

[19]  Stuart Boon,et al.  A comparison of UK academics' conceptions of information literacy in two disciplines: English and Marketing , 2009 .

[20]  Peter Checkland,et al.  Learning For Action: A Short Definitive Account of Soft Systems Methodology, and its use for Practitioners, Teachers and Students , 2007 .

[21]  Donald Beagle,et al.  Extending the Information Commons: From instructional testbed to Internet2 , 2002 .

[22]  Mary M. Somerville Participatory co-design: A relationship building approach for co-creating libraries of the future , 2007 .

[23]  Barbara Tierney,et al.  Information Commons Redux: Concept, Evolution, and Transcending the Tragedy of the Commons. , 2002 .

[24]  Kenneth E. Marks,et al.  What if you build it, and they keep coming and coming and coming? , 2005, Libr. Hi Tech.

[25]  Haiqing Lin,et al.  From information commons to knowledge commons: Building a collaborative knowledge sharing environment for innovative communities , 2009, Electron. Libr..

[26]  Mary M. Somerville,et al.  A user-centered and evidence-based approach for digital library projects , 2009, Electron. Libr..

[27]  Oeit Future of the Learning Space: Breaking Out of the Box , 2005 .

[28]  Diana G. Oblinger,et al.  Educating the Net Generation , 2005 .

[29]  Rebecca S. Feind Results of a Phenomenographic Investigation of how Faculty and Staff Perceive, Engage in, and View Information Literacy , 2008 .

[30]  Donald Beagle,et al.  The Information Commons Handbook , 2006 .

[31]  Mary H Nino,et al.  Collaborative co-design: A user-centric approach for advancement of organizational learning , 2007 .

[32]  Jennifer Church The evolving Information Commons , 2005, Libr. Hi Tech.

[33]  Donald Beagle The Emergent Information Commons: Philosophy, Models, and 21st Century Learning Paradigms , 2010 .

[34]  Anita Mirijamdotter,et al.  An interactive and iterative evaluation approach for creating collaborative learning environments , 2006 .

[35]  Jill McKinstry 11 – Beyond Facebook: thinking of the Learning Commons as a social network , 2008 .

[36]  Bryan Sinclair Commons 2.0: Library Spaces Designed for Collaborative Learning. , 2007 .

[37]  Lauren Anderson,et al.  Teaching to Change the World , 1998 .

[38]  John Seely Brown,et al.  Book Reviews : The Social Life of Information By John Seely Brown and Paul Duguid. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2000. 320 pages , 2000 .

[39]  Diana G. Oblinger Boomers, Gen-Xers, and Millennials: Understanding the "New Students.". , 2003 .

[40]  Sue Holwell,et al.  Information, Systems and Information Systems: Making Sense of the Field , 1998 .

[41]  Anita Mirijamdotter,et al.  The Cal Poly digital learning initiative , 2007 .

[42]  Mary M. Somerville,et al.  From information to learning commons: Campus planning highlights , 2010 .

[43]  Mary M. Somerville,et al.  Toward Co-Creation of Knowledge in the Interaction Age: An Organizational Case Study , 2007 .

[44]  A. Milne,et al.  Entering the Interaction Age: Implementing a Future Vision for Campus Learning Spaces...Today. , 2007 .

[45]  Mary M. Somerville,et al.  Learning our way to change: improved institutional alignment , 2006 .

[46]  John Seely Brown,et al.  Growing Up: Digital: How the Web Changes Work, Education, and the Ways People Learn , 2000 .

[47]  Martin Guha Learning Commons: Evolution and Collaborative Essentials , 2010 .

[48]  Mary M. Somerville,et al.  The ETS iSkillsTM Assessment: a digital age tool , 2008, Electron. Libr..

[49]  Barbara Schader Learning commons : evolution and collaborative essentials , 2008 .

[50]  Anita Mirijamdotter,et al.  Building on what we know: staff development in the digital age , 2005, Electron. Libr..

[51]  Susan Gardner,et al.  What Students Want: Generation Y and the Changing Function of the Academic Library , 2005 .

[52]  Carole C. Wedge,et al.  Creation of the Learning Space: Catalysts for Envisioning and Navigating the Design Process. , 2005 .

[53]  Charlie Bennett,et al.  Academic Engagement in the Library Commons , 2010 .

[54]  Gabrielle K.W. Wong Piloting an information commons at HKUST library , 2009 .