Coaxial laser triangulation for height monitoring in laser metal deposition

Abstract The control of the height parameter plays a crucial role in the laser metal deposition (LMD) process. A mismatch between the deposition height increment and the process growth rate can generate geometrical inaccuracies as well as collisions. The paper presents a method based on triangulation for monitoring in-line the height on a LMD system composed of a coaxial deposition head, an anthropomorphic robot and a fiber laser. The measurement device is implemented within the deposition head, with a probe laser beam that is launched coaxially through the nozzle and focused directly on the melt pool at different positions depending on the standoff distance. The position of the probe spot is acquired through a coaxial camera and converted in relative height values. The system is demonstrated for the distance measurement over a range of some millimeters during the deposition of AISI 316L stainless steel. This method allows for high flexibility being independent on the deposition direction.

[1]  Richard Leach,et al.  Review of in-situ process monitoring and in-situ metrology for metal additive manufacturing , 2016 .

[2]  Bengt Lennartson,et al.  Height control of laser metal-wire deposition based on iterative learning control and 3D scanning , 2012 .

[3]  Pan Michaleris,et al.  Effect of inter-layer dwell time on distortion and residual stress in additive manufacturing of titanium and nickel alloys , 2015 .

[4]  Andrew J. Pinkerton,et al.  The significance of deposition point standoff variations in multiple-layer coaxial laser cladding (coaxial cladding standoff effects) , 2004 .

[5]  L. Tang,et al.  Layer-to-Layer Height Control for Laser Metal Deposition Process , 2011 .

[6]  Lijun Song,et al.  Control of melt pool temperature and deposition height during direct metal deposition process , 2012 .

[7]  Michael Rethmeier,et al.  In-situ distortions in LMD additive manufacturing walls can be measured with digital image correlation and predicted using numerical simulations , 2018 .

[8]  L. Svensson,et al.  Investigation of laser metal deposited Alloy 718 onto an EN 1.4401 stainless steel substrate , 2017 .

[9]  William E. Frazier,et al.  Metal Additive Manufacturing: A Review , 2014, Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance.

[10]  P. Michaleris,et al.  In situ monitoring and characterization of distortion during laser cladding of Inconel® 625 , 2015 .

[11]  Dichen Li,et al.  The influence of standoff variations on the forming accuracy in laser direct metal deposition , 2011 .

[12]  Hoejin Kim,et al.  A review on quality control in additive manufacturing , 2018 .