Cultural Polarization and the Role of Extremist Agents: A Simple Simulation Model

Cultural dynamics can be heavily influenced by extremists. To better understand this influence, temporal dynamics of an arbitrary cultural belief are simulated in a simple computational model. Extremist agents, holding an immutable and extreme belief, are used to examine the process of polarization --- adoption of the extremist belief by the entire population. Two possible methods of counteracting polarization are examined, removal of the extremist agent and introducing a counter-extremist which holds an immutable belief at the opposite extreme. Eliminating the extremist agent is only effective at the onset of cultural transition, while introducing a counter-extremist is effective at any time and will lead to a dynamic intermediate belief. Finally, a parameter governing the society's willingness to adopt new beliefs is varied. As it decreases, extremist agents are unable polarize a society. Instead the population breaks permanently into two or more belief groups. The study closes with a possible pathway for extremists to nevertheless polarize a society not open to new beliefs.

[1]  F C Santos,et al.  Epidemic spreading and cooperation dynamics on homogeneous small-world networks. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[2]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Scale-Free Networks: A Decade and Beyond , 2009, Science.

[3]  Lori Rosenkopf,et al.  Social Network Effects on the Extent of Innovation Diffusion: A Computer Simulation , 1997 .

[4]  Robin Cowan,et al.  Network Structure and the Diffusion of Knowledge , 2004 .

[5]  J. F. F. Mendes Science of complex networks : from biology to the Internet and WWW : CNET 2004 : Aveiro, Portugal, 29 August-2 September, 2004 , 2005 .

[6]  R. Cialdini,et al.  Social influence: Social norms, conformity and compliance. , 1998 .

[7]  F. C. Santos,et al.  Graph topology plays a determinant role in the evolution of cooperation , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[8]  V. Mahajan,et al.  Innovation Diffusion and New Product Growth Models in Marketing , 1979 .

[9]  R. Axelrod An Evolutionary Approach to Norms , 1986, American Political Science Review.

[10]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Randomized gossip algorithms , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[11]  S. Bowles Warriors, Levelers, and the Role of Conflict in Human Social Evolution , 2012, Science.

[12]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[13]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[14]  S. Shutters,et al.  A Simulation Model of Cultural Consensus and Persistent Conflict , 2008 .

[15]  S. Bikhchandani,et al.  You have printed the following article : A Theory of Fads , Fashion , Custom , and Cultural Change as Informational Cascades , 2007 .

[16]  S. Fiske,et al.  The Handbook of Social Psychology , 1935 .

[17]  Vincent Buskens,et al.  9. A New Model for Information Diffusion in Heterogeneous Social Networks , 1999 .

[18]  S. Delre Effects of social networks on innovation diffusion and market dynamics , 2007 .