Biomarker Evaluation by Multiple Kernel Learning for Schizophrenia Detection

In this paper, we use the promising paradigm of Multiple Kernel Learning (MKL) to challenge the problem of biomarker evaluation for schizophrenia detection. We use eight different Regions of Interest (ROIs) extracted from Magnetic Resonance Images (MRIs). For each region we evaluate both tissue and geometric properties. We show that with MKL we not only obtain more accurate classifiers than using single source support vector machines (SVMs), feature concatenation and kernel averaging but also we evaluate the relevance of the brain biomarkers in predicting this disease. On a data set of 50 patients and 50 healthy controls we can achieve an increase of 7% accuracy compared to standard methods. Moreover, we are able to quantify the importance of each source of information by highlighting the synergies between the involved brain characteristics.

[1]  Daoqiang Zhang,et al.  Multimodal classification of Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment , 2011, NeuroImage.

[2]  Robert P. W. Duin,et al.  Dissimilarity-Based Detection of Schizophrenia , 2010, 2010 First Workshop on Brain Decoding: Pattern Recognition Challenges in Neuroimaging.

[3]  Ethem Alpaydin,et al.  Localized algorithms for multiple kernel learning , 2013, Pattern Recognit..

[4]  Vladimir Vapnik,et al.  Statistical learning theory , 1998 .

[5]  Nello Cristianini,et al.  An Introduction to Support Vector Machines and Other Kernel-based Learning Methods , 2000 .

[6]  P. Renshaw,et al.  Update on the use of MR for assessment and diagnosis of psychiatric diseases. , 2010, Radiology.

[7]  M. Bellani,et al.  The use and meaning of the continuous performance test in schizophrenia , 2008, Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale.

[8]  Nello Cristianini,et al.  Learning the Kernel Matrix with Semidefinite Programming , 2002, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[9]  Ethem Alpaydin,et al.  Multiple Kernel Learning Algorithms , 2011, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[10]  V. Calhoun,et al.  Voxel-based morphometry versus region of interest: a comparison of two methods for analyzing gray matter differences in schizophrenia , 2005, Schizophrenia Research.

[11]  Vikas Singh,et al.  Predictive markers for AD in a multi-modality framework: An analysis of MCI progression in the ADNI population , 2011, NeuroImage.

[12]  Roman Filipovych,et al.  Multi-Kernel Classification for Integration of Clinical and Imaging Data: Application to Prediction of Cognitive Decline in Older Adults , 2011, MLMI.

[13]  Alexander Zien,et al.  lp-Norm Multiple Kernel Learning , 2011, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[14]  A. Versace,et al.  Decreased entorhinal cortex volumes in schizophrenia , 2008, Schizophrenia Research.

[15]  Suyash P. Awate,et al.  Multivariate High-Dimensional Cortical Folding Analysis, Combining Complexity and Shape, in Neonates with Congenital Heart Disease , 2009, IPMI.

[16]  R. McCarley,et al.  A review of MRI findings in schizophrenia , 2001, Schizophrenia Research.

[17]  D. Rujescu,et al.  Dissecting the many genetic faces of schizophrenia , 2009, Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale.

[18]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Multiple kernel learning, conic duality, and the SMO algorithm , 2004, ICML.

[19]  Christos Davatzikos,et al.  Why voxel-based morphometric analysis should be used with great caution when characterizing group differences , 2004, NeuroImage.

[20]  M. Kloft,et al.  l p -Norm Multiple Kernel Learning , 2011 .

[21]  M. Bellani,et al.  Thalamic‐insular dysconnectivity in schizophrenia: Evidence from structural equation modeling , 2012, Human brain mapping.

[22]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Statistical parametric mapping , 2013 .

[23]  Andrea J. van Doorn,et al.  Surface shape and curvature scales , 1992, Image Vis. Comput..

[24]  Jayaram K. Udupa,et al.  New variants of a method of MRI scale standardization , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.