Measuring Public Support for Prisoner Reentry Options

Few topics have been discussed more extensively or feverishly within correctional academic and professional circles in the past few decades than prisoner reentry. Although program and policy evaluations have been conducted, a lack of public support for prisoner reentry initiatives could undermine the sustainability of prisoner reentry as a large-scale movement. Interestingly, no multivariate, explanatory analyses of the correlates of support for prisoner reentry policies could be found in the literature. This omission is due in part to the absence of clear psychometric measures to assess support. The current study examines the data obtained from a sample of residents in a Midwestern state to determine the dimensionality of support for prisoner reentry interventions using both exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and ordinary least squares (OLS) regression. Specifically, our expectation is that the following three-factor structure will be identified: (a) support for transitional programs aimed at building skills and knowledge to handle the obstacles of the prison-to-community transitional process, (b) support for post-release transitional housing units, and (c) opposition to denying offenders housing opportunities. Our results support a three-factor model. The implications of these findings for future research are discussed.

[1]  Richard C. McCorkle.  Research Note: Punish and Rehabilitate? Public Attitudes Toward Six Common Crimes , 1993 .

[2]  R. Cattell.  The Scree Test For The Number Of Factors. , 1966, Multivariate behavioral research.

[3]  L. Dundes,et al.  Help Wanted: A Survey of Employer Concerns About Hiring Ex-Convicts , 2002 .

[4]  P. Langan,et al.  Recidivism of Prisoners Released in 1994 , 2002 .

[5]  Todd R. Clear,et al.  Incarceration and the Community: The Problem of Removing and Returning Offenders , 2001 .

[6]  Eric J. Wodahl,et al.  Value Conflict and Public Opinion Toward Prisoner Reentry Initiatives , 2013 .

[7]  P. Brewer,et al.  Values, Framing, and Citizens' Thoughts about Policy Issues: Effects on Content and Quantity , 2005 .

[8]  A. Piquero,et al.  Public preferences for rehabilitation versus incarceration of juvenile offenders , 2010 .

[9]  P W Corrigan,et al.  Familiarity with and social distance from people who have serious mental illness. , 2001, Psychiatric services.

[10]  Nygel Lenz.  “Luxuries” in Prison: The Relationship Between Amenity Funding and Public Support , 2002 .

[11]  Aida Y. Hass,et al.  Public Opinion on Juvenile Blended Sentencing , 2012 .

[12]  R. Warner.  Applied statistics: From bivariate through multivariate techniques, 2nd ed. , 2013 .

[13]  J. Petersilia,et al.  When Prisoners Return to the Community: Political, Economic, and Social Consequences , 2000 .

[14]  P. O’Brien,et al.  “Just like Baking a Cake”: Women Describe the Necessary Ingredients for Successful Reentry after Incarceration , 2001 .

[15]  J. Immerwahr.  The Revolving Door: Exploring Public Attitudes toward Prisoner Reentry , 2002 .

[16]  J. Petersilia,et al.  Prisoner Reentry: Public Safety and Reintegration Challenges , 2001 .

[17]  Richard P. Seiter,et al.  Prisoner Reentry: What Works, What Does Not, and What Is Promising , 2003 .

[18]  Sean Nicholson-Crotty,et al.  Dynamic Representation(s): Federal Criminal Justice Policy and an Alternative Dimension of Public Mood , 2009 .

[19]  Christy A. Visher,et al.  CHICAGO PRISONERS' EXPERIENCES RETURNING HOME , 2004 .

[20]  Andrea M. Leverentz.  Neighborhood context of attitudes toward crime and reentry , 2011 .

[21]  R. Wilton.  GROUNDING HIERARCHIES OF ACCEPTANCE: THE SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION OF DISABILITY IN NIMBY CONFLICTS , 2000 .

[22]  Amy L. Solomon,et al.  Summary of Focus Group with Ex-Prisoners in the District: Ingredients for Successful Reintegration: (717962011-001) , 2001 .

[23]  J. Travis.  From Prison to Home - The Dimensions and Consequences of Prisoner Reentry , 2001 .

[24]  M. Maxfield,et al.  Basics of Research Methods for Criminal Justice and Criminology , 1994 .

[25]  Kelly Welch.  Changing Attitudes to Punishment: Public Opinion, Crime, and Justice , 2004 .

[26]  Robbin S. Ogle.  Theoretical Perspectives On Correctional Structure, Evaluation, and Change , 1998 .

[27]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 1983 .

[28]  Dennis R. Longmire,et al.  Americans View Crime and Justice: A National Public Opinion Survey , 1996 .

[29]  Eric J. Wodahl,et al.  Prisoner Reentry in a Small Metropolitan Community: Obstacles and Policy Recommendations , 2011 .

[30]  Eric J. Wodahl.  The Challenges of Prisoner Reentry from a Rural Perspective , 2006 .

[31]  P. Burstein.  The Impact of Public Opinion on Public Policy: A Review and an Agenda , 2003 .

[32]  Sarah D. Brown.  Public attitudes toward the treatment of sex offenders , 1999 .

[33]  A. Piquero,et al.  NORMALIZATION AND LEGITIMATION: MODELING STIGMATIZING ATTITUDES TOWARD EX‐OFFENDERS* , 2010 .

[34]  R. Gainey,et al.  What drives punitive beliefs?: Demographic characteristics and justifications for sentencing , 2004 .

[35]  B. Applegate.  Penal austerity: Perceived utility, desert, and public attitudes toward prison amenities , 2001 .

[36]  Robert C. Davis,et al.  GOOD INTENTIONS MEET HARD REALITIES: AN EVALUATION OF THE PROJECT GREENLIGHT REENTRY PROGRAM , 2006 .

[37]  D. Nagin,et al.  Public preferences for rehabilitation versus incarceration of juvenile offenders: evidence from a contingent valuation survey , 2006 .

[38]  Diana Adler,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 2016 .

[39]  B. Fisher,et al.  Public views toward crime and correctional policies: Is there a gender gap? , 2002 .

[40]  D. Garland.  The Culture of Control , 2001, Crime, Inequality and the State.

[41]  Amy L. Solomon.  Understanding the Challenges of Prisoner Reentry: Research Findings from the Urban Institute's Prisoner Reentry Portfolio , 2006 .

[42]  Luís Antônio Francisco de Souza.  The culture of control: crime and social order in contemporary, society , 2003 .

[43]  F. Taxman,et al.  Emerging Roles and Responsibilities in the Reentry Partnership Initiative: New Ways of Doing Business , 2002 .

[44]  F. T. Cullen,et al.  Reconsidering Child Saving , 2009 .

[45]  Shadd Maruna,et al.  Public opinion and community penalties , 2004 .

[46]  S. Feldman.  Values, ideology, and the structure of political attitudes. , 2003 .

[47]  B. Richie,et al.  Challenges Incarcerated Women Face as They Return to Their Communities: Findings from Life History Interviews , 2001 .

[48]  Shadd Maruna.  Welcome Home? Examining the Reentry Court Concept from a Strengths-Based Perspective , 2003 .

[49]  P. Corrigan,et al.  Familiarity with mental illness and social distance from people with schizophrenia and major depression: testing a model using data from a representative population survey , 2004, Schizophrenia Research.

[50]  Jurg Gerber,et al.  Just and Painful: Attitudes Toward Sentencing Criminals , 1996 .

[51]  Grant Duwe,et al.  Evaluating the Minnesota Comprehensive Offender Reentry Plan (MCORP): Results from a Randomized Experiment , 2012 .

[52]  B. Fisher,et al.  Public Opinion about Punishment and Corrections , 2000, Crime and Justice.

[53]  Christopher Wlezien,et al.  Patterns of Representation: Dynamics of Public Preferences and Policy , 2004, The Journal of Politics.

[54]  Christy A. Visher,et al.  Prisoner Reentry in the First Decade of the Twenty-first Century , 2010 .

[55]  L. Roberts,et al.  What Predicts Punitiveness? An Examination of Predictors of Punitive Attitudes towards Offenders in Australia , 2012 .

[56]  M. Dear,et al.  Seeing People Differently: The Sociospatial Construction of Disability , 1997 .

[57]  Michael Dear,et al.  Understanding and Overcoming the NIMBY Syndrome , 1992 .

[58]  Shadd Maruna,et al.  Once a Criminal, Always a Criminal?: ‘Redeemability’ and the Psychology of Punitive Public Attitudes , 2009 .

[59]  Cherie Dawson‐Edwards.  Enfranchising Convicted Felons: Current Research on Opinions Towards Felon Voting Rights , 2008 .