Complete and true: A uniform analysis for mention some and mention all

This paper provides a uniform analysis for the interpretations of indirect mention-some questions and indirect mention-all questions. The main goal of this paper is to characterize the readings that are sensitive to false answers, which are usually called “intermediately exhaustive” readings in the case of mention-all. To capture mention-some grammatically, I adopt Fox’s (2013) view that “completeness” amounts to Max-informativity, not exhaustiveness. Next, I argue that the “sensitivity to false answers” in direct questions is a matter of quality, not a result of exhaustification (compare Klinedinst & Rothschild 2011). Finally, I present a principled explanation as to why some false answers are more tolerated than the others.

[1]  Yimei Xiang,et al.  Solving the dilemma between uniqueness and mention some* , 2015 .

[2]  G. Chierchia,et al.  The Grammatical View of Scalar Implicatures and the Relationship between Semantics and Pragmatics , 2008 .

[3]  Nathan Klinedinst,et al.  Exhaustivity in questions with non-factives , 2011 .

[4]  C. L. Hamblin.  QUESTIONS IN MONTAGUE ENGLISH , 1976 .

[5]  Lauri Karttunen,et al.  Some observations on factivity , 1971 .

[6]  Benjamin Spector,et al.  A uniform semantics for embedded interrogatives: an answer, not necessarily the answer , 2015, Synthese.

[7]  Robin Cooper,et al.  The syntax and semantics of when-questions , 1982 .

[8]  Veneeta Dayal.  Locality in WH Quantification: Questions and Relative Clauses in Hindi , 2010 .

[9]  Robert van Rooij,et al.  Pragmatic Meaning and Non-monotonic Reasoning: The Case of Exhaustive Interpretation , 2006 .

[10]  Jeroen Groenendijk,et al.  On the semantics of questions and the pragmatics of answers , 1984 .

[11]  Jacopo Romoli,et al.  The Presuppositions of Soft Triggers are Obligatory Scalar Implicatures , 2015, J. Semant..

[12]  Benjamin George,et al.  Question Embedding and the Semantics of Answers , 2011 .

[13]  Florian Schwarz,et al.  An Experimental Comparison Between Presuppositions and Indirect Scalar Implicatures , 2015 .

[14]  Yael Sharvit,et al.  A question of strength: on NPIs in interrogative clauses , 2007 .

[15]  Emmanuel Chemla,et al.  A Psycholinguistic Study of the Exhaustive Readings of Embedded Questions , 2014, J. Semant..

[16]  Andreea Cristina Nicolae,et al.  Any Questions? Polarity as a Window into the Structure of Questions , 2013 .

[17]  Benjamin R. George,et al.  Knowing‐‘wh’, Mention‐Some Readings, and Non‐Reducibility , 2013 .