Wavelet-based noise-model driven denoising algorithm for differential phase contrast mammography.

Traditional mammography can be positively complemented by phase contrast and scattering x-ray imaging, because they can detect subtle differences in the electron density of a material and measure the local small-angle scattering power generated by the microscopic density fluctuations in the specimen, respectively. The grating-based x-ray interferometry technique can produce absorption, differential phase contrast (DPC) and scattering signals of the sample, in parallel, and works well with conventional X-ray sources; thus, it constitutes a promising method for more reliable breast cancer screening and diagnosis. Recently, our team proved that this novel technology can provide images superior to conventional mammography. This new technology was used to image whole native breast samples directly after mastectomy. The images acquired show high potential, but the noise level associated to the DPC and scattering signals is significant, so it is necessary to remove it in order to improve image quality and visualization. The noise models of the three signals have been investigated and the noise variance can be computed. In this work, a wavelet-based denoising algorithm using these noise models is proposed. It was evaluated with both simulated and experimental mammography data. The outcomes demonstrated that our method offers a good denoising quality, while simultaneously preserving the edges and important structural features. Therefore, it can help improve diagnosis and implement further post-processing techniques such as fusion of the three signals acquired.

[1]  I. Johnstone,et al.  Ideal spatial adaptation by wavelet shrinkage , 1994 .

[2]  R. Kaufmann,et al.  Noise analysis of grating-based x-ray differential phase contrast imaging. , 2010, The Review of scientific instruments.

[3]  Martin Vetterli,et al.  Adaptive wavelet thresholding for image denoising and compression , 2000, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[4]  Elsa D. Angelini,et al.  Wavelets in Medical Image Processing: Denoising, Segmentation, and Registration , 2005 .

[5]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Complex Wavelet Structural Similarity: A New Image Similarity Index , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[6]  T. D. Bui,et al.  Image denoising using neighbouring wavelet coefficients , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[7]  S. Arumuga Perumal,et al.  Image De-noising using Discrete Wavelet transform , 2008 .

[8]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Mean squared error: Love it or leave it? A new look at Signal Fidelity Measures , 2009, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[9]  Guy Gilboa,et al.  Constrained and SNR-Based Solutions for TV-Hilbert Space Image Denoising , 2006, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision.

[10]  C. David,et al.  The First Analysis and Clinical Evaluation of Native Breast Tissue Using Differential Phase-Contrast Mammography , 2011, Investigative radiology.

[11]  Jan Švihlík,et al.  Biomedical Image Volumes Denoising via the Wavelet Transform , 2011 .

[12]  M. Priestley Evolutionary Spectra and Non‐Stationary Processes , 1965 .

[13]  Martin Vetterli,et al.  Spatially adaptive wavelet thresholding with context modeling for image denoising , 1998, Proceedings 1998 International Conference on Image Processing. ICIP98 (Cat. No.98CB36269).

[14]  L. Costaridou,et al.  A wavelet-based spatially adaptive method for mammographic contrast enhancement. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[15]  Aleksandra Pizurica,et al.  EM-based estimation of spatially variant correlated image noise , 2008, 2008 15th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[16]  J. Kaufhold,et al.  A calibration approach to glandular tissue composition estimation in digital mammography. , 2002, Medical physics.

[17]  Pavel Kisilev,et al.  Noise and Signal Activity Maps for Better Imaging Algorithms , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[18]  Martin Vetterli,et al.  Spatially adaptive wavelet thresholding with context modeling for image denoising , 2000, IEEE Trans. Image Process..