Variables Affecting Speech Perception in Postlingually Deaf Adults Following Cochlear Implantation

Objective--To evaluate the time span over which there is greatest improvement in postlingually deaf adults undergoing cochlear implantation. Additionally, to quantify potential patient and device factors that may predict the postoperative results. Material and methods--A longitudinal study was conducted. Numbers, monosyllables and sentence test results were collected for 66 cochlear implant subjects [Combi 40/40+, n=60; Clarion HF2, n=2; Nucleus 24m/k, n=4] at regular intervals for up to 6 years following cochlear implantation. Results--All patients showed a steady improvement over time on all tests. Progress during the first 12 months was statistically significant, with further improvements being recorded after the 12-month testing period. The duration of deafness and the number of electrodes (8 for the Combi 40, 12 for the Combi 40+) appeared to be weakly correlated with postoperative performance. Re-implantation after device failure had no negative effect on speech reception. Subjects who were "upgraded" from an analogue to a digital cochlear implant improved their test results almost twofold. Conclusion--All the patients in our study gained substantial benefit from their cochlear implants. It is encouraging to note that the factors examined were not deemed to be relevant predictors of performance. Even long-term deaf subjects and re-implantees are able to achieve an excellent level of speech perception.

[1]  T. Nikolopoulos,et al.  Determinants of speech perception in children after cochlear implantation , 2000, The Lancet.

[2]  W. Baumgartner,et al.  Audiological Performance with Cochlear Reimplantation from Analogue Single-Channel Implants to Digital Multi-channel Devices: Rendimiento audiológico con reimplantación coclear: de los implantes analógicos de un canal a los digitales multi-canal , 2000, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[3]  R. Shannon,et al.  Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  B. Reimer,et al.  Results of cochlear implantation in patients with severe to profound hearing loss--implications for patient selection. , 1998, Audiology.

[5]  Shipp Db,et al.  Prognostic indicators of speech recognition performance in adult cochlear implant users: a prospective analysis. , 1995 .

[6]  W K Gstoettner,et al.  Speech discrimination scores of postlingually deaf adults implanted with the Combi 40 cochlear implant. , 2000, Advances in oto-rhino-laryngology.

[7]  J. Nedzelski,et al.  Prognostic indicators of speech recognition performance in adult cochlear implant users: a prospective analysis. , 1995, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.

[8]  W Baumgartner,et al.  Optimization of channel number and stimulation rate for the fast continuous interleaved sampling strategy in the COMBI 40+. , 1997, The American journal of otology.

[9]  Jafar Hamzavi,et al.  Does cochlear reimplantation affect speech recognition?: ¿Afecta la reimplantación coclear el reconocimiento del lenguaje? , 2002, International journal of audiology.

[10]  S. Waltzman,et al.  Predictors of postoperative performance with cochlear implants. , 1995, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.

[11]  L Whitford,et al.  Factors affecting auditory performance of postlinguistically deaf adults using cochlear implants. , 1996, Audiology & neuro-otology.

[12]  C Totten,et al.  Early Experience with the Cochlear Esprit Ear-Level Speech Processor in Children , 2000, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.

[13]  W Baumgartner,et al.  Evaluation of performance with the COMBI40 cochlear implant in adults: a multicentric clinical study. , 1997, ORL; journal for oto-rhino-laryngology and its related specialties.

[14]  H. Hildmann,et al.  Comparison of the TEMPO+ Ear-Level Speech Processor and the CIS PRO+ Body-Worn Processor in Adult MED-EL Cochlear Implant Users , 2001, ORL.