Controlling for Heterogeneity in Gravity Models of Trade and Integration

This paper compares various specifications of the gravity model of trade as nested versions of a general specification that uses bilateral country-pair fixed effects to control for heterogeneity. For each specification, we show that the atheoretical restrictions used to obtain them from the general model are not supported statistically. Because the gravity model has become the "workhorse" baseline model for estimating the effects of international integration, this has important empirical implications. In particular, we show that, unless heterogeneity is accounted for correctly, gravity models can greatly overestimate the effects of integration on the volume of trade.

[1]  S. Wei,et al.  Regionalization of World Trade and Currencies: Economics and Politics , 1998 .

[2]  Dale Boisso,et al.  Economic Distance, Cultural Distance, and Openness in International Trade: Empirical Puzzles , 1997 .

[3]  A. Rose,et al.  One money, one market : the effect of common currencies on trade , 2000 .

[4]  H. Wall,et al.  Gravity Model Specification and the Effects of the Canada-U.S. Border , 2000 .

[5]  P. Bianchi.  The political economy of economic integration , 1998 .

[6]  J. Mendez,et al.  Regional economic integration and the volume of intra-regional trade: a comparison of developed and developing country experience. , 1983 .

[7]  S. Wei,et al.  Open versus Closed Trade Blocs , 1997 .

[8]  J. Bergstrand.  The Generalized Gravity Equation, Monopolistic Competition, and the Factor-Proportions Theory in International Trade , 1989 .

[9]  M. Lord,et al.  Regional trade patterns , 1998 .

[10]  A. Krueger,et al.  Regionalism versus Multilateral Trade Arrangements, NBER-EASE Volume 6 , 1997 .

[11]  H. Wall.  Using the gravity model to estimate the costs of protection , 1999 .

[12]  Hélène Rey,et al.  How Has Regionalism in the 1990s Affected Trade? , 1995 .

[13]  H. Wall,et al.  NAFTA and the Geography of North American Trade , 2000 .

[14]  Jeffrey A. Frankel,et al.  The Regionalization Of The World Economy , 1997 .

[15]  Laszlo Matyas,et al.  Proper Econometric Specification of the Gravity Model , 1997 .

[16]  Norman D. Aitken.  The Effect of the EEC and EFTA on European Trade: A Temporal Cross-Section Analysis , 1973 .

[17]  Ernesto H. Stein,et al.  Trading blocs and the Americas: The natural, the unnatural, and the super-natural , 1995 .

[18]  Cletus C. Coughlin,et al.  NAFTA and the changing pattern of state exports , 2000 .

[19]  J. Helliwell.  Do National Borders Matter for Quebec&Apos;S Trade? , 1995 .

[20]  John Mccallum,et al.  National Borders Matter: Canada-U.S. Regional Trade Patterns , 1995 .

[21]  John A. Sawyer,et al.  An econometric study of international trade flows , 1967 .

[22]  A. Rose,et al.  Does a Currency Union Affect Trade? The Time Series Evidence , 2001 .

[23]  Marcos Sanso,et al.  Bilateral trade flows, the gravity equation, and functional form , 1993 .

[24]  Victor I. Oguledo,et al.  Gravity models: a reformulation and an application to discriminatory trade arrangements , 1994 .

[25]  Pamela J. D. Smith.  Are Weak Patent Rights a Barrier to U.S. Exports , 1999 .

[26]  R. Cooper,et al.  Regional Trading Blocs in the World Trading System , 1998 .

[27]  Barry Eichengreen,et al.  The Role of History in Bilateral Trade Flows , 1996 .

[28]  Barry Eichengreen,et al.  Is Regionalism Simply a Diversion?: Evidence from the Evolution of the EC and Efta , 1995, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[29]  J. Tinbergen.  Shaping the World Economy: Suggestions for an International Economic Policy , 1964 .

[30]  Robert C. Feenstra,et al.  World trade flows: 1980-1997 , 2000 .