An international multicenter randomized study of computer‐assisted oral anticoagulant dosage vs. medical staff dosage

Summary.  Background: Increased demand for oral anticoagulants is overwhelming facilities worldwide, resulting in increasing use of computer assistance. A multicenter clinical endpoint study has been performed to compare the safety and effectiveness of computer‐assisted dosage with dosage by experienced medical staff at the same centers. Methods: A randomized study of dosage of two commercial computer‐assisted dosage programs (PARMA 5 and DAWN AC) vs. manual dosage at 32 centers with an established interest in oral anticoagulation in 13 countries. The aim was to recruit a minimum of 16 000 patient‐years randomized to medical staff or computer‐assisted dosage. In total, 13 219 patients participated, 6503 patients being randomized to medical staff and 6716 to computer‐assisted dosage. The safety and effectiveness of computer‐assisted dosage were compared with those of medical staff dosage. Results: In total, 13 052 patients were recruited (18 617 patient‐years). International Normalized Ratio (INR) tests numbered 193 890 with manual dosage and 193 424 with computer‐assisted dosage. The number of clinical events with computer‐assisted dosage was lower (P = 0.1), but in the 3209 patients with deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism, they were reduced by 37 (24%, P = 0.001). Time in target INR range was significantly improved by computer assistance as compared with medical staff dosage at the majority of centers (P < 0.001). Conclusions: The safety and effectiveness of computer‐assisted dosage has been demonstrated using two different marketed programs in comparison with experienced medical staff dosage at the centers with established interest in anticoagulation. Significant prevention of clinical events in patients with deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism and the achievement of target INR in all clinical groups has been observed. The reliability and safety of other marketed computer‐assisted dosage programs need to be established.

[1]  C P Bradley,et al.  Evaluation of computerized decision support for oral anticoagulation management based in primary care. , 1996, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[2]  W. Ageno,et al.  A randomized comparison of a computer-based dosing program with a manual system to monitor oral anticoagulant therapy. , 1998, Thrombosis research.

[3]  F D Hobbs,et al.  Oral anticoagulation management in primary care with the use of computerized decision support and near-patient testing: a randomized, controlled trial. , 2000, Archives of internal medicine.

[4]  P. Sawicki,et al.  A structured teaching and self-management program for patients receiving oral anticoagulation: a randomized controlled trial. Working Group for the Study of Patient Self-Management of Oral Anticoagulation. , 1999, JAMA.

[5]  F D Hobbs,et al.  Primary care anticoagulant clinic management using computerized decision support and near patient International Normalized Ratio (INR) testing: routine data from a practice nurse-led clinic. , 1998, Family practice.

[6]  P. J. Ryan,et al.  Computer control of anticoagulant dose for therapeutic management. , 1989, BMJ.

[7]  J. Vandenbroucke,et al.  Optimal oral anticoagulant therapy in patients with mechanical heart valves. , 1995, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  J. Visser.  [A quarter of a century of computer-assisted anticoagulant treatment]. , 1997, Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde.

[9]  R Wilson,et al.  Computer assisted management of warfarin treatment. , 1984, British medical journal.

[10]  D. Fitzmaurice,et al.  Anticoagulation management in primary care: a trial‐based economic evaluation , 2000, British journal of haematology.

[11]  F R Rosendaal,et al.  A Method to Determine the Optimal Intensity of Oral Anticoagulant Therapy , 1993, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[12]  G. Mariani,et al.  A computerized regulation of dosage in oral anticoagulant therapy , 1990, La Ricerca in clinica e in laboratorio.

[13]  L. Poller,et al.  Prospective comparative study of computer programs used for management of warfarin. , 1993, Journal of clinical pathology.

[14]  J. Jespersen,et al.  Multicentre randomised study of computerised anticoagulant dosage , 1998, The Lancet.

[15]  M. Moia,et al.  Effect of computer-aided management on the quality of treatment in anticoagulated patients: a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial of APROAT (Automated PRogram for Oral Anticoagulant Treatment). , 2001, Haematologica.

[16]  W. Ageno,et al.  A Computer Generated Induction System for Hospitalized Patients Starting on Oral Anticoagulant Therapy , 2000, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.