of construction probability on word durations during spontaneous incremental sentence production

In a series of seven studies, this paper examines acoustic characteristics of the spontaneous speech production of the English dative alternation (gave the book to the boy / the boy the book) as a function of the probability of the choice between alternating constructions. Probabilistic eects on the acoustic duration were observed in the acoustic signal at the choice point (the rst word that commits the speaker to one of the alternatives), before the choice point, but not after the choice point. These ndings speak in favor of the simultaneous operation of production mechanisms consistent with both informationsmoothing theories and availability-based models of speech production: they are incompatible with a number of competing theoretical accounts. Finally, we outline the statistical modeling procedure of multimodel inference suitable for addressing our multiple working hypotheses and the ultimate question of the explanatory role of probability.

[1]  Thomas Wasov,et al.  Postverbal behavior , 2002, CSLI lecture notes series.

[2]  Steven T Piantadosi,et al.  Word lengths are optimized for efficient communication , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al.  The use of "that" in the Production and Comprehension of Object Relative Clauses , 2003 .

[4]  Benedikt Szmrecsanyi,et al.  Recent changes in the function and frequency of Standard English genitive constructions: a multivariate analysis of tagged corpora , 2007, English Language and Linguistics.

[5]  T. C. Chamberlin The Method of Multiple Working Hypotheses , 1931, The Journal of Geology.

[6]  Kieran Snyder The relationship between *form and *function in ditransitive constructions , 2003 .

[7]  Björn Lindblom,et al.  Explaining Phonetic Variation: A Sketch of the H&H Theory , 1990 .

[8]  R. Levy Expectation-based syntactic comprehension , 2008, Cognition.

[9]  Thomas Hofmann,et al.  Speakers optimize information density through syntactic reduction , 2007 .

[10]  C. Fellbaum Examining the Constraints on the Benefactive Alternation by Using the World Wide Web as a Corpus , 2005 .

[11]  J. K. Bock Syntactic persistence in language production , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.

[12]  R. Harald Baayen,et al.  Predicting the dative alternation , 2007 .

[13]  G. Dell,et al.  Effect of Ambiguity and Lexical Availability on Syntactic and Lexical Production , 2000, Cognitive Psychology.

[14]  Rens Bod,et al.  Exemplar-based syntax: How to get productivity from examples , 2006 .

[15]  J. Bresnan,et al.  Syntactic probabilities affect pronunciation variation in spontaneous speech , 2009, Language and Cognition.

[16]  M. Krug String Frequency , 1998 .

[17]  H. Akaike,et al.  Information Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle , 1973 .

[18]  T. Jaeger,et al.  Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society , 2008 .

[19]  William D. Raymond,et al.  Probabilistic Relations between Words: Evidence from Reduction in Lexical Production , 2008 .

[20]  Walter Daelemans,et al.  Memory-Based Language Processing (Studies in Natural Language Processing) , 2005 .

[21]  Richard A. Rhodes,et al.  English reduced vowels and the nature of natural processes , 1996 .

[22]  Frank Keller,et al.  The Entropy Rate Principle as a Predictor of Processing Effort: An Evaluation against Eye-tracking Data , 2004, EMNLP.

[23]  William D. Raymond,et al.  The effects of collocational strength and contextual predictability in lexical production 1 , 1999 .

[24]  R. Baayen,et al.  Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items , 2008 .

[25]  Joan L. Bybee,et al.  Language, Usage and Cognition , 2010 .

[26]  Mercè Prat-Sala,et al.  Discourse constraints on syntactic processing in language production , 2000 .

[27]  Kathryn Bock,et al.  Language production : Grammatical encoding , 1994 .

[28]  Edward Kennard Rand,et al.  On the Composition of Boethius' Consolatio Philosophiae , 2022 .

[29]  R. A. Leibler,et al.  On Information and Sufficiency , 1951 .

[30]  Elisabeth Dévière,et al.  Analyzing linguistic data: a practical introduction to statistics using R , 2009 .

[31]  C. Browman,et al.  Articulatory Phonology: An Overview , 1992, Phonetica.

[32]  T. Florian Jaeger,et al.  Redundancy and reduction: Speakers manage syntactic information density , 2010, Cognitive Psychology.

[33]  J. Bresnan,et al.  Spoken syntax: The phonetics of giving a hand in New Zealand English , 2006 .

[34]  Joan L. Bybee,et al.  From Usage to Grammar: The Mind's Response to Repetition , 2007 .

[35]  W. Labov,et al.  Constraints on the agentless passive , 1983, Journal of Linguistics.

[36]  Dan Jurafsky,et al.  Effects of disfluencies, predictability, and utterance position on word form variation in English conversation. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[37]  Jean Christophe Verstraeh Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure , 2005 .

[38]  Carlos Gómez Gallo,et al.  Incremental Syntactic Planning across Clauses , 2008 .

[39]  Kathryn Bock,et al.  Toward a Cognitive Psychology of Syntax: Information Processing Contributions to Sentence Formulation , 1982 .

[40]  Susan M. Garnsey,et al.  Knowledge of Grammar, Knowledge of Usage: Syntactic Probabilities Affect Pronunciation Variation , 2004 .

[41]  Frank E. Harrell,et al.  Regression Modeling Strategies: With Applications to Linear Models, Logistic Regression, and Survival Analysis , 2001 .

[42]  S. Lazic,et al.  Model based Inference in the Life Sciences: a Primer on Evidence , 2011 .

[43]  Eugene Charniak,et al.  Entropy Rate Constancy in Text , 2002, ACL.

[44]  J. Elman,et al.  Why is that? Structural prediction and ambiguity resolution in a very large corpus of English sentences , 2006, Cognition.

[45]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection bias and Freedman’s paradox , 2010 .

[46]  H. Akaike A new look at the statistical model identification , 1974 .

[47]  Hugo Quené,et al.  Multilevel modeling of between-speaker and within-speaker variation in spontaneous speech tempo. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[48]  Mirjam Ernestus,et al.  Morphological predictability and acoustic duration of interfixes in Dutch compounds. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[49]  E. Steyerberg,et al.  [Regression modeling strategies]. , 2011, Revista espanola de cardiologia.

[50]  D. Cox,et al.  An Analysis of Transformations , 1964 .

[51]  Walter Daelemans,et al.  MEMORY-BASED LEARNING MODELS OF INFLECTIONAL MORPHOLOGY: A METHODOLOGICAL CASE STUDY , 2007 .

[52]  Jan P. H. van Santen,et al.  Duration and spectral balance of intervocalic consonants: A case for efficient communication , 2005, Speech Commun..

[53]  William D. Raymond,et al.  Reduction of English function words in switchboard , 1998, ICSLP.

[54]  M. H. Kelly,et al.  Word and World Order: Semantic, Phonological, and Metrical Determinants of Serial Position , 1993, Cognitive Psychology.

[55]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Multimodel Inference , 2004 .

[56]  Michael Speriosu,et al.  The role of prosody in the English dative alternation , 2010 .

[57]  D. Whalen Infrequent words are longer in duration than frequent words. , 1991 .

[58]  J. Bresnan,et al.  The Gradience of the Dative Alternation , 2008 .

[59]  Kathryn Bock,et al.  Syntactic effects of information availability in sentence production , 1980 .

[60]  Stefan Thomas Gries,et al.  Multifactorial Analysis in Corpus Linguistics: A Study of Particle Placement , 2003 .

[61]  Douglas Roland,et al.  Frequency of Basic English Grammatical Structures: A Corpus Analysis. , 2007, Journal of memory and language.

[62]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[63]  Hinrich Schütze,et al.  Multilevel Exemplar Theory , 2010, Cogn. Sci..

[64]  Joan L. Bybee,et al.  The effect of usage on degrees of constituency: the reduction of don't in English , 1999 .

[65]  D. Bates,et al.  Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS , 2001 .

[66]  Jennifer E. Arnold,et al.  Heaviness vs. newness: The effects of structural complexity and discourse status on constituent ordering , 2015 .

[67]  G. Zipf,et al.  The Psycho-Biology of Language , 1936 .

[68]  Joseph Picone,et al.  Resegmentation of SWITCHBOARD , 1998, ICSLP.

[69]  M. Masson,et al.  A linear mixed model analysis of masked repetition priming , 2010 .

[70]  K. Bock,et al.  From conceptual roles to structural relations: bridging the syntactic cleft. , 1992, Psychological review.

[71]  Steven Greenberg,et al.  INSIGHTS INTO SPOKEN LANGUAGE GLEANED FROM PHONETIC TRANSCRIPTION OF THE SWITCHBOARD CORPUS , 1996 .

[72]  Mark Liberman,et al.  Towards an integrated understanding of speaking rate in conversation , 2006, INTERSPEECH.

[73]  Susanne Gahl,et al.  Knowledge of Grammar Includes Knowledge of Syntactic Probabilities , 2006 .

[74]  Lars Hinrichs,et al.  Probabilistic determinants of genitive variation in spoken and written English: a multivariate comparison across time, space, and genres , 2008 .

[75]  M. Aylett,et al.  Language redundancy predicts syllabic duration and the spectral characteristics of vocalic syllable nuclei. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[76]  S. Thompson The iconicity of "dative shift" in English: Considerations from information flow in discourse , 1995 .

[77]  S. Gries Syntactic Priming: A Corpus-based Approach , 2005, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[78]  Joan Bybee Joan Bybee: Phonology and Language Use , 2004, Phonetica.

[79]  V. Ferreira Is It Better to Give Than to Donate? Syntactic Flexibility in Language Production , 1996 .

[80]  Peter Collins The indirect object construction in English: an informational approach , 1995 .

[81]  Eric-Jan Wagenmakers,et al.  How many parameters does it take to fit an elephant , 2003 .

[82]  John A. Hawkins,et al.  A Performance Theory of Order and Constituency , 1995 .

[83]  Jason M. Brenier,et al.  Predictability Effects on Durations of Content and Function Words in Conversational English , 2009 .

[84]  M. Pickering,et al.  Constituent structure is formulated in one stage. , 2002 .

[85]  Michael K. Tanenhaus,et al.  Producing Less Preferred Structures: More Gestures, Less Fluency , 2009 .

[86]  S. Gries,et al.  Extending collostructional analysis: A corpus-based perspective on `alternations' , 2004 .

[87]  Elisabeth Selkirk,et al.  The Prosodic Structure of Function Words , 2008 .

[88]  Mirjam Ernestus,et al.  Lexical frequency and acoustic reduction in spoken Dutch. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[89]  William N. Venables,et al.  Modern Applied Statistics with S-Plus. , 1996 .

[90]  R. H. Baayen,et al.  The CELEX Lexical Database (CD-ROM) , 1996 .

[91]  Rena Torres Cacoullos,et al.  On the persistence of grammar in discourse formulas: a variationist study of that , 2009 .

[92]  van Son,et al.  Information Structure and Efficiency in Speech Production , 2022 .

[93]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[94]  Joan L. Bybee,et al.  Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure , 2001 .

[95]  J. Bresnan,et al.  Predicting syntax: Processing dative constructions in American and Australian varieties of English , 2010 .

[96]  Robert P. Freckleton,et al.  Dealing with collinearity in behavioural and ecological data: model averaging and the problems of measurement error , 2010, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[97]  D. Freedman A Note on Screening Regression Equations , 1983 .

[98]  Joan L. Bybee,et al.  PHONOLOGICAL EVIDENCE FOR EXEMPLAR STORAGE OF MULTIWORD SEQUENCES , 2002, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[99]  J. R. Koehler,et al.  Modern Applied Statistics with S-Plus. , 1996 .

[100]  K. Bock,et al.  Framing sentences , 1990, Cognition.

[101]  John R Anderson,et al.  An integrated theory of the mind. , 2004, Psychological review.

[102]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .

[103]  Walter Krämer,et al.  Review of Modern applied statistics with S, 4th ed. by W.N. Venables and B.D. Ripley. Springer-Verlag 2002 , 2003 .

[104]  M. MacDonald,et al.  Conflicting cues and competition in subject-verb agreement , 2003 .

[105]  Eric S Solomon,et al.  Semantic integration and syntactic planning in language production , 2004, Cognitive Psychology.

[106]  Zenzi M. Griffin,et al.  The persistence of structural priming: transient activation or implicit learning? , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[107]  Alice Turk,et al.  The Smooth Signal Redundancy Hypothesis: A Functional Explanation for Relationships between Redundancy, Prosodic Prominence, and Duration in Spontaneous Speech , 2004, Language and speech.

[108]  J. Ohala,et al.  Speech perception is hearing sounds, not tongues. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[109]  G. Zipf,et al.  Relative Frequency as a Determinant of Phonetic Change , 1930 .

[110]  Charles M. Francis,et al.  Confronting collinearity: comparing methods for disentangling the effects of habitat loss and fragmentation , 2009, Landscape Ecology.

[111]  John J. Godfrey,et al.  SWITCHBOARD: telephone speech corpus for research and development , 1992, [Proceedings] ICASSP-92: 1992 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[112]  Maria Lapata,et al.  Acquiring Lexical Generalizations from Corpora: A Case Study for Diathesis Alternations , 1999, ACL.