Constraints on extended Bekenstein models from cosmological, astrophysical, and local data

Searching for variations of nature's fundamental constants is a crucial step in our quest to go beyond our current standard model of fundamental physics. If they exist, such variations will be very likely driven by the existence of a new fundamental field. The Bekenstein model and its extensions introduce such a scalar field in a purely phenomenological way, inducing a variation of the fine-structure constant on cosmological scales. This theoretical framework is as simple and general as possible while still preserving all the symmetries of standard quantum electrodynamics. When allowing for couplings to the other sectors of the Universe, such as baryons, dark matter, and the cosmological constant, the Bekenstein model is expected to reproduce the low energy limits of several grand unification, quantum gravity, and higher dimensional theories. In this work, we constrain different versions of the Bekenstein model by confronting the full cosmological evolution of the field with an extensive set of astrophysical, cosmological, and local measurements. We show that couplings of the order of parts per million (ppm) are excluded for all the cases considered, imposing strong restrictions on theoretical frameworks aiming to deal with variations of the fine-structure constant.

[1]  C. Martins,et al.  Varying fine-structure constant cosmography , 2022, Physics Letters B.

[2]  Edward J. Wollack,et al.  Probing Cosmic Inflation with the LiteBIRD Cosmic Microwave Background Polarization Survey , 2022, Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics.

[3]  F. Zerbi,et al.  Fundamental physics with ESPRESSO: Precise limit on variations in the fine-structure constant towards the bright quasar HE0515-4414 , 2021, Astronomy & Astrophysics.

[4]  J. Chluba,et al.  Varying fundamental constants principal component analysis: additional hints about the Hubble tension , 2021, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[5]  J. Lesgourgues,et al.  The H0 Olympics: A fair ranking of proposed models , 2021, Physics Reports.

[6]  A. Ealet,et al.  Euclid: Constraining dark energy coupled to electromagnetism using astrophysical and laboratory data , 2021, Astronomy & Astrophysics.

[7]  E. Peik,et al.  Improved Limits for Violations of Local Position Invariance from Atomic Clock Comparisons. , 2020, Physical review letters.

[8]  Edward J. Wollack,et al.  The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR4 maps and cosmological parameters , 2020, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics.

[9]  Antony Lewis,et al.  GetDist: a Python package for analysing Monte Carlo samples , 2019, 1910.13970.

[10]  Adrian T. Lee,et al.  Measurements of B -mode polarization of the cosmic microwave background from 500 square degrees of SPTpol data , 2019, Physical Review D.

[11]  R. B. Barreiro,et al.  Planck 2018 results , 2019, Astronomy & Astrophysics.

[12]  M. Vogel Theory and experiment in gravitational physics, 2nd edition , 2019 .

[13]  C. A. Oxborrow,et al.  Planck2018 results , 2018, Astronomy & Astrophysics.

[14]  J. Lesgourgues,et al.  MontePython 3: Boosted MCMC sampler and other features , 2018, Physics of the Dark Universe.

[15]  C. Martins,et al.  Current and future constraints on extended Bekenstein-type models for a varying fine-structure constant , 2018, 1801.08089.

[16]  T. Damour,et al.  MICROSCOPE Mission: First Results of a Space Test of the Equivalence Principle. , 2017, Physical review letters.

[17]  David O. Jones,et al.  Type Ia Supernova Distances at Redshift >1.5 from the Hubble Space Telescope Multi-cycle Treasury Programs: The Early Expansion Rate , 2017, 1710.00844.

[18]  C. Martins The status of varying constants: a review of the physics, searches and implications , 2017, Reports on progress in physics. Physical Society.

[19]  M. Murphy,et al.  Subaru Telescope limits on cosmological variations in the fine-structure constant , 2017, 1708.00014.

[20]  J. Chluba,et al.  New constraints on time-dependent variations of fundamental constants using Planck data , 2017, 1705.03925.

[21]  W. M. Wood-Vasey,et al.  The clustering of galaxies in the completed SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: cosmological analysis of the DR12 galaxy sample , 2016, 1607.03155.

[22]  C. Martins,et al.  Current and future constraints on Bekenstein-type models for varying couplings , 2016, 1607.01677.

[23]  Daniel Thomas,et al.  A 6% measurement of the Hubble parameter at z∼0.45: direct evidence of the epoch of cosmic re-acceleration , 2016, 1601.01701.

[24]  C. Martins,et al.  Fine-structure constant constraints on Bekenstein-type models , 2014, 1407.4099.

[25]  G. W. Pratt,et al.  Planck intermediate results - XXIV. Constraints on variations in fundamental constants , 2014, 1406.7482.

[26]  S. Liberati,et al.  Nonequivalence of equivalence principles , 2013, 1310.7426.

[27]  K. Benabed,et al.  Conservative Constraints on Early Cosmology: an illustration of the Monte Python cosmological parameter inference code , 2012, 1210.7183.

[28]  J. Gundlach,et al.  Torsion-balance tests of the weak equivalence principle , 2012, 1207.2442.

[29]  J. Lesgourgues,et al.  The Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System (CLASS) I: Overview , 2011, 1104.2932.

[30]  Jean-Philippe Uzan,et al.  Varying Constants, Gravitation and Cosmology , 2010, Living reviews in relativity.

[31]  R. Carswell,et al.  Indications of a spatial variation of the fine structure constant. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[32]  T. Damour,et al.  Phenomenology of the equivalence principle with light scalars , 2010, 1007.2790.

[33]  D. Wineland,et al.  Frequency Ratio of Al+ and Hg+ Single-Ion Optical Clocks; Metrology at the 17th Decimal Place , 2008, Science.

[34]  John G. Barrow Varying constants , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[35]  C. Will The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment , 2005, Living reviews in relativity.

[36]  M. Onegin,et al.  Natural nuclear reactor at Oklo and variation of fundamental constants: Computation of neutronics of a fresh core , 2005, hep-ph/0506186.

[37]  J. Bekenstein Fine-structure constant variability, equivalence principle, and cosmology , 2002, gr-qc/0208081.

[38]  K. Olive,et al.  Evolution of the fine structure constant driven by dark matter and the cosmological constant , 2001, hep-ph/0110377.

[39]  M. Zaldarriaga,et al.  Changing alpha with time: implications for fifth-force-type experiments and quintessence. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[40]  H. Sandvik,et al.  A simple cosmology with a varying fine structure constant. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[41]  C. Martins Cosmology with varying constants , 2000, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[42]  Jacob D. Bekenstein,et al.  Fine Structure Constant: Is It Really a Constant? , 1982 .

[43]  Arnulf Quadt,et al.  Oxford University Press : Review of Particle Physics, 2020-2021 , 2020 .