Image coding quality assessment using fuzzy integrals with a three-component image model

Based on importance measures and fuzzy integrals, a new assessment method for image coding quality is presented in this paper. The proposed assessment is based on two subevaluations. In the first subevaluation, errors on edges, textures, and flat regions are computed individually. The errors are then assessed using an assessment function. A global evaluation with Sugeno fuzzy integral is then obtained based on the importance measure of edge, texture, and flat region. In the second subevaluation, an importance measure is first established depending on the types of regions where errors occur, a subtle evaluation is then obtained using Sugeno fuzzy integral on all pixels of the image. A final evaluation is obtained based on the two subevaluations. Experimental results show that this new image quality assessment closely approximates human subjective tests such as mean opinion score with a high correlation coefficient of 0.963, which is a significant improvement over peak signal-to-noise ratio, picture quality scale, and weighted mean square error, three other image coding quality assessment methods, which have the correlation coefficients of 0.821, 0.875, and 0.716, respectively.

[1]  Jung-Hsien Chiang,et al.  Hybrid fuzzy-neural systems in handwritten word recognition , 1997, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst..

[2]  E. Reed The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1989 .

[3]  Paul D. Gader,et al.  Recognition technology for the detection of buried land mines , 2001, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst..

[4]  G. Klir,et al.  Fuzzy Measure Theory , 1993 .

[5]  Manfred Glesner,et al.  A fuzzy rule-based system for the subjective quality evaluation of distorted images , 1997 .

[6]  Jung-Hsien Chiang,et al.  Choquet fuzzy integral-based hierarchical networks for decision analysis , 1999, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst..

[7]  Hong Yan,et al.  Fuzzy Algorithms: With Applications to Image Processing and Pattern Recognition , 1996, Advances in Fuzzy Systems - Applications and Theory.

[8]  Zia-ur Rahman,et al.  Properties and performance of a center/surround retinex , 1997, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[9]  Hamid R. Tizhoosh,et al.  Image enhancement based on fuzzy aggregation techniques , 1999, IMTC/99. Proceedings of the 16th IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (Cat. No.99CH36309).

[10]  M. Sugeno FUZZY MEASURES AND FUZZY INTEGRALS—A SURVEY , 1993 .

[11]  D Wang,et al.  Use of fuzzy-logic-inspired features to improve bacterial recognition through classifier fusion , 1998, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B.

[12]  James M. Keller,et al.  Information fusion in computer vision using the fuzzy integral , 1990, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[13]  Wilson S. Geisler,et al.  Image quality assessment based on a degradation model , 2000, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[14]  N. Sato,et al.  Subjective evaluation methods of facsimile image quality , 1993, Proceedings of ICC '93 - IEEE International Conference on Communications.

[15]  Nariman Farvardin,et al.  A perceptually motivated three-component image model-Part I: description of the model , 1995, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[16]  V. Ralph Algazi,et al.  Objective picture quality scale (PQS) for image coding , 1998, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[17]  N. W. Lewis,et al.  Subjective quality of television pictures with multiple impairments , 1965 .