Model or Metaphor? A Critical Review of the Policy Network Approach

Policy network analysis has become the dominant paradigm for the study of the policy-making process in British political science and has assumed great importance in Europe and America. Recently both Governance and European Journal of Political Research have had special issues on policy networks: whilst Policy Sciences and International Organization have each devoted one issue to the related concept of ‘advocacy coalitions’ and ‘epistemic comm~nities’.~ Two British Social Science Research Council (SSRC) Initiatives were theoretically driven by the network approach and policy networks were a core theme of the 1994 Political Studies Association conference.6 It is time to take stock: to see how much we have learned about policy-making from this approach, to judge whether it can develop into a genuine and fruitful theory of the policy process or whether a more fundamental theory is required. In this review I argue that whilst we have learned much about the policy process by cataloguing the policy world into different types of network, the approach will not, alone, take us much further. Policy network analysis began as a metaphor, and may only become a theory by developing along the lines of sociological network analysis.

[1]  Nan Lin,et al.  Access to occupations through social ties , 1986 .

[2]  Karen E. Campbell,et al.  SOCIAL RESOURCES AND SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS , 1986 .

[3]  R. Werle,et al.  Policy Networks in the German Telecommunications Domain , 1991 .

[4]  Grant Jordan Sub-Governments, Policy Communities and Networks , 1990 .

[5]  N. Lin,et al.  Social Resources and Strength of Ties: Structural Factors in Occupational Status Attainment , 1981, Social Capital, Social Support and Stratification.

[6]  H. Jenkins-Smith Alternative Theories of the Policy Process: Reflections on Research Strategy for the Study of Nuclear Waste Policy * , 1991 .

[7]  Edward O. Laumann,et al.  The Hollow Core: Private Interests in National Policy Making , 1993 .

[8]  Mark S. Granovetter ECONOMIC ACTION AND SOCIAL STRUCTURE: , 2022, The New Economic Sociology.

[9]  W. Raub,et al.  Reputation and Efficiency in Social Interactions: An Example of Network Effects , 1990, American Journal of Sociology.

[10]  Paul A. Sabatier,et al.  Toward Better Theories of the Policy Process , 1991, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[11]  Mark S. Granovetter Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[12]  Charles O. Jones American Politics and the Organization of Energy Decision Making , 1979 .

[13]  Michael M. Atkinson,et al.  Strong States and Weak States: Sectoral Policy Networks in Advanced Capitalist Economies , 1989, British Journal of Political Science.

[14]  James K. Sebenius,et al.  Challenging conventional explanations of international cooperation: negotiation analysis and the case of epistemic communities , 1992, International Organization.

[15]  R. Kessler,et al.  Social factors in psychopathology: stress, social support, and coping processes. , 1985, Annual review of psychology.

[16]  Frans van Waarden,et al.  Dimensions and types of policy networks , 1992 .

[17]  David Knoke,et al.  The Organizational State: Social Choice in National Policy Domains , 1987 .

[18]  W. Maloney,et al.  The dynamics of policy change: Lobbying and water privatisation , 1992 .

[19]  Wayne E. Baker,et al.  The Social Structure of a National Securities Market , 1984, American Journal of Sociology.

[20]  S. Phillips Meaning and Structure in Social Movements: Mapping the Network of National Canadian Women's Organizations , 1991, Canadian Journal of Political Science.

[21]  E. Ziskind Social factors in psychopathology. , 1954 .

[22]  M. Wickham‐Jones MONETARISM AND ITS CRITICS: THE UNIVERSITY ECONOMISTS’PROTEST OF 1981 , 1992 .