Virtual Affinity Fingerprints for Target Fishing: A New Application of Drug Profile Matching

We recently introduced Drug Profile Matching (DPM), a novel virtual affinity fingerprinting bioactivity prediction method. DPM is based on the docking profiles of ca. 1200 FDA-approved small-molecule drugs against a set of nontarget proteins and creates bioactivity predictions based on this pattern. The effectiveness of this approach was previously demonstrated for therapeutic effect prediction of drug molecules. In the current work, we investigated the applicability of DPM for target fishing, i.e. for the prediction of biological targets for compounds. Predictions were made for 77 targets, and their accuracy was measured by Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis. Robustness was tested by a rigorous 10-fold cross-validation procedure. This procedure identified targets (N = 45) with high reliability based on DPM performance. These 45 categories were used in a subsequent study which aimed at predicting the off-target profiles of currently approved FDA drugs. In this data set, 79% of the known drug-target interactions were correctly predicted by DPM, and additionally 1074 new drug-target interactions were suggested. We focused our further investigation on the suggested interactions of antipsychotic molecules and confirmed several interactions by a review of the literature.

[1]  I. Kuntz,et al.  Molecular similarity based on DOCK-generated fingerprints. , 1996, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[2]  H. Wikström,et al.  New (sulfonyloxy)piperazinyldibenzazepines as potential atypical antipsychotics: chemistry and pharmacological evaluation. , 1999, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[3]  M. Kukla,et al.  Pyrrole mannich bases as potential antipsychotic agents. , 1992, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry.

[4]  E. Richelson Neuroleptic Binding to Human Brain Receptors: Relation to Clinical Effects a , 1988, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[5]  Jaques Reifman,et al.  DOVIS 2.0: an efficient and easy to use parallel virtual screening tool based on AutoDock 4.0 , 2008, Chemistry Central journal.

[6]  D. Sibley,et al.  D4 dopamine receptor binding affinity does not distinguish between typical and atypical antipsychotic drugs , 1995, Psychopharmacology.

[7]  M. Teitler,et al.  Inverse agonist activity of atypical antipsychotic drugs at human 5-hydroxytryptamine2C receptors. , 2000, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[8]  Hans Briem,et al.  Flexsim-X: A Method for the Detection of Molecules with Similar Biological Activity , 2000, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[9]  Andreas Bender,et al.  "Bayes Affinity Fingerprints" Improve Retrieval Rates in Virtual Screening and Define Orthogonal Bioactivity Space: When Are Multitarget Drugs a Feasible Concept? , 2006, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[10]  P. Seeman,et al.  Atypical Neuroleptics Have Low Affinity for Dopamine D2 Receptors or Are Selective for D4 Receptors , 1997, Neuropsychopharmacology.

[11]  Michael J. Keiser,et al.  Predicting new molecular targets for known drugs , 2009, Nature.

[12]  B. Roth,et al.  Binding of typical and atypical antipsychotic agents to transiently expressed 5-HT1C receptors. , 1992, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[13]  Csaba Hetényi,et al.  Contribution of 2D and 3D Structural Features of Drug Molecules in the Prediction of Drug Profile Matching , 2012, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[14]  Kai Huang,et al.  PharmMapper server: a web server for potential drug target identification using pharmacophore mapping approach , 2010, Nucleic Acids Res..

[15]  Xiaomin Luo,et al.  TarFisDock: a web server for identifying drug targets with docking approach , 2006, Nucleic Acids Res..

[16]  H. Yamamura,et al.  Pharmacological comparison of the cloned human and rat M2 muscarinic receptor genes expressed in the murine fibroblast (B82) cell line. , 1998, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[17]  David S. Goodsell,et al.  A semiempirical free energy force field with charge‐based desolvation , 2007, J. Comput. Chem..

[18]  Robert P Sheridan,et al.  Why do we need so many chemical similarity search methods? , 2002, Drug discovery today.

[19]  E. Richelson,et al.  Antagonism by neuroleptics of neurotransmitter receptors of normal human brain in vitro. , 1984, European journal of pharmacology.

[20]  Choong Yong Ung,et al.  Can an in silico Drug‐Target Search Method Be Used to Probe Potential Mechanism of Medicinal Plant Ingredients? , 2003 .

[21]  D. Bylund Interactions of neuroleptic metabolites with dopaminergic, alpha adrenergic and muscarinic cholinergic receptors. , 1981, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[22]  Z. Deng,et al.  Bridging chemical and biological space: "target fishing" using 2D and 3D molecular descriptors. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[23]  A. Poling,et al.  Neuroleptics and learning: effects of haloperidol, molindone, mesoridazine and thioridazine on the behavior of pigeons under a repeated acquisition procedure. , 1990, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[24]  Christopher I. Bayly,et al.  Evaluating Virtual Screening Methods: Good and Bad Metrics for the "Early Recognition" Problem , 2007, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[25]  S. Snyder,et al.  Histamine H1 receptors identified in mammalian brain membranes with [3H]mepyramine. , 1978, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  J. Black,et al.  Antipsychotic drugs: prediction of side-effect profiles based on neuroreceptor data derived from human brain tissue. , 1987, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[27]  Christian C. Felder,et al.  Muscarinic mechanisms of antipsychotic atypicality , 2003, Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry.

[28]  R. Blakely,et al.  Pharmacological profile of neuroleptics at human monoamine transporters. , 1999, European journal of pharmacology.

[29]  B. Roth,et al.  Magic shotguns versus magic bullets: selectively non-selective drugs for mood disorders and schizophrenia , 2004, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[30]  A. Harf,et al.  Droperidol Prevents Serotonin‐Induced Bronchospasm in the Guinea Pig , 1991, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[31]  P. Seeman,et al.  Antipsychotic drugs which elicit little or no Parkinsonism bind more loosely than dopamine to brain D2 receptors, yet occupy high levels of these receptors , 1998, Molecular Psychiatry.

[32]  S. Snyder,et al.  Dopamine receptor binding predicts clinical and pharmacological potencies of antischizophrenic drugs. , 1976, Science.

[33]  David M. Rocke,et al.  Predicting ligand binding to proteins by affinity fingerprinting. , 1995, Chemistry & biology.

[34]  Paul Ernsberger,et al.  H1-Histamine Receptor Affinity Predicts Short-Term Weight Gain for Typical and Atypical Antipsychotic Drugs , 2003, Neuropsychopharmacology.

[35]  J. M. Kennedy,et al.  Standard binding and functional assays related to medications development division testing for potential cocaine and opiate narcotic treatment medications. , 1998, NIDA research monograph.

[36]  Michael J. Keiser,et al.  Relating protein pharmacology by ligand chemistry , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.

[37]  E. Richelson,et al.  Antagonism by antimuscarinic and neuroleptic compounds at the five cloned human muscarinic cholinergic receptors expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells. , 1992, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[38]  U. Lessel,et al.  In vitro and in silico affinity fingerprints: Finding similarities beyond structural classes , 2000 .

[39]  C. Wermuth Selective optimization of side activities: another way for drug discovery. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[40]  T. Liljefors,et al.  Synthesis and structure-affinity relationship investigations of 5-heteroaryl-substituted analogues of the antipsychotic sertindole. A new class of highly selective alpha(1) adrenoceptor antagonists. , 2003, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[41]  P. Hajduk,et al.  Rational approaches to targeted polypharmacology: creating and navigating protein-ligand interaction networks. , 2010, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[42]  P. F. M. Janssen,et al.  Risperidone compared with new and reference antipsychotic drugs: in vitro and in vivo receptor binding , 1996, Psychopharmacology.

[43]  S. Snyder,et al.  Properties of [3H]haloperidol and [3H]dopamine binding associated with dopamine receptors in calf brain membranes. , 1976, Molecular pharmacology.

[44]  Y. Fukunishi,et al.  Classification of chemical compounds by protein-compound docking for use in designing a focused library. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[45]  Gergely Zahoránszky-Köhalmi,et al.  Drug Effect Prediction by Polypharmacology-Based Interaction Profiling , 2012, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[46]  David W. Smith,et al.  Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of 1-(1,2-Benzisothiazol-3-yl)- and (l,2-Benzisoxazol-3-yl)piperazine Derivatives as Potential Antipsychotic Agents. , 1986 .

[47]  Anders Wallqvist,et al.  Exploring Polypharmacology Using a ROCS-Based Target Fishing Approach , 2012, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[48]  J. Arnt,et al.  Do Novel Antipsychotics Have Similar Pharmacological Characteristics? A Review of the Evidence , 1998, Neuropsychopharmacology.

[49]  Naomie Salim,et al.  Combination of Fingerprint-Based Similarity Coefficients Using Data Fusion , 2003, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[50]  A. Hopkins Network pharmacology: the next paradigm in drug discovery. , 2008, Nature chemical biology.

[51]  E. Richelson,et al.  Binding of antipsychotic drugs to human brain receptors focus on newer generation compounds. , 2000, Life sciences.

[52]  V. Poroikov,et al.  PASS: identification of probable targets and mechanisms of toxicity , 2007, SAR and QSAR in environmental research.

[53]  Luhua Lai,et al.  Further development and validation of empirical scoring functions for structure-based binding affinity prediction , 2002, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[54]  Andreas Bender,et al.  From in silico target prediction to multi-target drug design: current databases, methods and applications. , 2011, Journal of proteomics.

[55]  H O Villar,et al.  Protein affinity map of chemical space. , 1998, Journal of chromatography. B, Biomedical sciences and applications.

[56]  M. Millan,et al.  Competitive antagonism of serotonin (5-HT)2C and 5-HT2A receptormediated phosphoinositide (PI) turnover by clozapine in the rat: A comparison to other antipsychotics , 1994, Neuroscience Letters.

[57]  Haruki Nakamura,et al.  An Efficient in Silico Screening Method Based on the Protein-Compound Affinity Matrix and Its Application to the Design of a Focused Library for Cytochrome P450 (CYP) Ligands , 2006, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[58]  Andreas Bender,et al.  Ligand-Target Prediction Using Winnow and Naive Bayesian Algorithms and the Implications of Overall Performance Statistics , 2008, J. Chem. Inf. Model..