The effects of innovation on firm performance of supporting industries in Hanoi – Vietnam

Purpose:  Innovation, including product, process, marketing, and organizational innovation within a firm, is considered as one of essential component for surviving and growing. These innovation activities create value and competitive advantages for successful organizations; therefore, understanding the organization’s overall innovation is the first and foremost to understand the role of innovation on firm performance. The objective of this research is to explore two parts: the impacts of innovation on the different aspect of innovation performance, then their effects to firm performance (production, market, and financial performance). Design/methodology/approach:  This study uses primary data from questionnaire survey. The questionnaire involves 4 parts including general information, innovation activities; innovative performance, and firm performance. This research focuses on firms in supporting industries of mechanics, electronics, motorbike and automobile. These firms are in a list of companies (known as The Excellent Vietnamese Companies in Northern and Central Vietnam) established by JETRO and VCCI. There are 150 firms in this list. The questionnaire survey was administered to directors, CEO of those firms during April and May, 2014. Out of the 150 questionnaires sent out, 118 were valid, accounting for 78.7% of the true response rate. Analysis methodologies of reliability, factor analysis and regression are utilized in this paper. Findings:  The result demonstrated there are positive effects of process, marketing, and organizational innovations on firm performance in supporting firms. More specifically, the higher the level of innovation activities is, the greater the innovative performance is, which means the larger level of Process, organization and marketing innovation activities are, the higher level of innovative performance are likely to be. Secondly, the higher level of Process, organization and marketing innovative performance, the better level of firm performances is likely to be. To sum up, in order to improve the innovative and firm performance, those firms in supporting industry should highly concentrate on process, marketing, and organizational innovation activities, rather than product innovation activities. Originality/value:  Initially, this study applies successfully the model which supposing innovation is a process, then clarifying innovation definition through the impact of innovation activities on innovative performances. Secondly, this research confirmed the positive impact of innovative performances on firm performances. It provided one more empirical evidence of the relationship between innovation and firm performance. For practitioners, organizational innovation and process innovation are more important factors affecting innovative performance and firm performance than product and marketing innovation. Therefore, enterprises should focus and mobilize resources to create improvement in organizational structure and manufacturing processes.

[1]  Jeff W. Trailer,et al.  Measuring performance in entrepreneurship research , 1996 .

[2]  Miika Varis,et al.  Types of innovation, sources of information and performance in entrepreneurial SMEs , 2010 .

[3]  D. Third.  OECD/Eurostat . Oslo Manual-Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Paris, France: , 2005 .

[4]  S Y Sohn,et al.  Structural equation model for the evaluation of national funding on R&D project of SMEs in consideration with MBNQA criteria. , 2007, Evaluation and program planning.

[5]  P. Drucker.  Innovation and entrepreneurship : practice and principles , 1985 .

[6]  R. Wolfe.  ORGANIZATIONAL INNOVATION: REVIEW, CRITIQUE AND SUGGESTED RESEARCH DIRECTIONS* , 1994 .

[7]  F. Damanpour.  Organizational complexity and innovation: developing and testing multiple contingency models , 1996 .

[8]  C. Fiol.  Squeezing Harder Doesn't Always Work: Continuing the Search for Consistency in Innovation Research , 1996 .

[9]  J. Ramalho-Santos,et al.  Cronbach's alpha: a tool for assessing the reliability of scales , 1999 .

[10]  Samuel T. Hunter,et al.  Leading for Innovation , 2011 .

[11]  J. Schumpeter.  The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle , 1934 .

[12]  Réjean Landry,et al.  Sources of information as determinants of novelty of innovation in manufacturing firms: evidence from the 1999 statistics Canada innovation survey , 2005 .

[13]  Jon-Arild Johannessen,et al.  Organisational innovation as part of knowledge management , 2008, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[14]  J. DeCoster.  Overview of Factor Analysis , 1998 .

[15]  James A. Wolff,et al.  Small‐Firm Performance: Modeling the Role of Product and Process Improvements , 2006 .

[16]  Richard M. Hodgetts,et al.  Entrepreneurship: A Contemporary Approach , 1994 .

[17]  L. Harris.  Market Orientation and Performance: Objective and Subjective Empirical Evidence from UK Companies , 2001 .

[18]  Geoffrey G. Bell.  Clusters, networks, and firm innovativeness , 2005 .

[19]  Kouichi Taji,et al.  Modeling Decision Analysis for Mitigating Natural Disaster Risks , 2000 .

[20]  D. Jiménez-Jiménez,et al.  Innovation, organizational learning, and performance , 2011 .

[21]  J. Mori.  Development of Supporting Industries for Vietnam ’ s Industrialization : Increasing Positive Vertical Externalities through Collaborative Training December 2005 , 2006 .

[22]  J. Hagedoorn,et al.  Measuring innovative performance: is there an advantage in using multiple indicators? , 2003 .

[23]  S. Gopalakrishnan,et al.  A review of innovation research in economics, sociology and technology management , 1997 .

[24]  J. Metcalfe.  Evolutionary Economics and Creative Destruction , 2002 .

[25]  Michael D. Mumford,et al.  Leading for innovation: Conclusions, issues, and directions , 2004 .

[26]  M. Tavakol,et al.  Making sense of Cronbach's alpha , 2011, International journal of medical education.

[27]  Craig Standing,et al.  How can organizations use wikis for innovation , 2011 .

[28]  V. Pucik,et al.  Relationship between innovativeness, quality, growth, profitability, and market value , 2005 .

[29]  Anurag Sharma,et al.  Linking Product Development Outcomes to Market Valuation of the Firm: The Case of the U.S. Pharmaceutical Industry* , 2004 .

[30]  K. Kilic,et al.  Effects of Innovation Types on Firm Performance , 2011 .

[31]  Raghu Garud,et al.  The Role of Narratives in Sustaining Organizational Innovation , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[32]  William B. Gartner,et al.  Innovation and Entrepreneurship , 1985 .

[33]  G. Hult,et al.  Does market orientation matter?: a test of the relationship between positional advantage and performance , 2001 .

[34]  Darren George,et al.  SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference , 1998 .

[35]  J. Dawes.  The Relationship between Subjective and Objective Company Performance Measures in Market Orientation Research: Further Empirical Evidence , 1999 .