Institutional change and scientific research: A preliminary bibliometric analysis of institutional influences on Turkey’s recent social science publications

This paper provides a detailed assessment of recent indexed journal publications by Turkish social scientists. We first present information on SCI, SSCI and AHCI indexed journal articles that were published by Turkish researchers over the past three decades. An inspection of publication statistics indicates a considerable improvement, especially during the last five years of the 1973–2005 period that we examine, in Turkey’s publication record in terms of number of articles authored or co-authored by Turkish researchers. In the next step, we scrutinize institutional sources of this improvement, emphasizing regulatory and organizational changes that have both forced researchers to publish in indexed journals and remunerated those who did so. Finally, we provide a qualitative assessment of recent improvement in publication performance of Turkish researchers by focusing on a particular behavioral consequence of institutional changes and its implications for impact that research from Turkey has on global research activity. Bibliometric analysis of articles published by Turkish researchers in SSCI-indexed journals during 2000–2005 shows that recent regulatory and organizational changes seem to have instituted a particular publication habit, publishing in journals with lower impact factor, which was earlier observed in other parts of the world where publication counts were used for performance evaluation, and that signs of improvement in our select indicators of impact are yet to be observed.

[1]  Melih Kirlidog,et al.  The effects of electronic access to scientific literature in the consortium of Turkish university libraries , 2007, Electron. Libr..

[2]  Yasar Tonta,et al.  Contribution of Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine to the world's biomedical literature (1988-1997) , 2004, Scientometrics.

[3]  Ulf Sandström,et al.  Institutionalizing the triple helix: research funding and norms in the academic system , 2000 .

[4]  L. Butler,et al.  The efficacy of different modes of funding research: perspectives from Australian data on the biological sciences , 1999 .

[5]  Yasar Tonta.  Contribution of Turkish Researchers to the World's Biomedical Literature (1988–1997) , 2004, Scientometrics.

[6]  L. Butler,et al.  Explaining Australia’s increased share of ISI publications—the effects of a funding formula based on publication counts , 2003 .

[7]  Ali Uzun,et al.  Citation status of Turkish physics publications in foreign journals: A global analysis , 2005, Scientometrics.

[8]  Ali Uzun.  A quantitative analysis of Turkish publication output in physics between 1938–1987 , 2005, Scientometrics.

[9]  L. Butler,et al.  Modifying publication practices in response to funding formulas , 2003 .

[10]  Yasar Tonta,et al.  Arts and humanities literature: Bibliometric characteristics of contributions by Turkish authors , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[11]  Sami Gülgöz,et al.  Turkey's output in social science publications: 1970-1999 , 2002, Scientometrics.

[12]  Sami Gülgöz,et al.  The increase in the rate of publications originating from Turkey , 1999, Scientometrics.

[13]  Erdal Inönü,et al.  The influence of cultural factors on scientific production , 2004, Scientometrics.

[14]  Pat Sikes,et al.  Working in a ‘new’ university: in the shadow of the Research Assessment Exercise? , 2006 .

[15]  Taner Altinok,et al.  ISI Atıf Endeksleri ve Türkiyeânin 2001-2005 Yılları Arasındaki Durumunun Değerlendirilmesi , 2006 .

[16]  R. Merton.  Social Theory and Social Structure , 1958 .

[17]  Ali Uzun,et al.  Science and technology policy in Turkey. National strategies for innovation and change during the 1983-2003 period and beyond , 2006, Scientometrics.

[18]  B. Martin,et al.  University Research Evaluation and Funding: An International Comparison , 2003 .