Leading by example: new professionalism and the government client

The capacity of government client bodies to lead other industry actors in the creation of a more sustainable built environment is assessed. A framework is introduced that records the legislation, guiding principles and policies influencing government clients towards new professional practices embracing dynamic interactions between people, process and technology. The framework is used to analyse case studies related to two US government client organizations: the General Services Administration (GSA) and the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL). The study finds that GSA and NREL are actively seeking innovation and influencing their consultants, contractors and other US government agencies through their policies and programmes, notably by piloting new professional practices associated with integrated project delivery and open communication. The initiatives and their effectiveness are further studied in a broader, international context of emerging best professional practices. Government clients are key agents for leading and motivating change, particularly through capacity-building in other professional services firms and contractors. Government clients can further expand their sphere of positive influence specifically in the assessment and integration of emerging technologies and in the extension of professional service contracts related to building performance and occupant engagement. La capacité des organismes publics clients à amener les autres acteurs du secteur à la création d'un cadre bâti plus durable est évaluée. Un cadre est présenté qui enregistre la législation, les principes directeurs et les politiques influençant les clients appartenant au secteur public dans le sens de nouvelles pratiques professionnelles englobant les interactions dynamiques entre les personnes, les processus et les technologies. Ce cadre est utilisé pour analyser les études de cas relatives à deux organismes publics clients américains : la GSA (General Services Administration – Administration des Services Généraux) et le NREL (National Renewable Energy Laboratory – Laboratoire National des Energies Renouvelables). L'étude constate que la GSA et le NREL recherchent activement l'innovation et influencent leurs consultants, fournisseurs et autres administrations publiques américaines à travers leurs politiques et leurs programmes, notamment par le pilotage de nouvelles pratiques professionnelles associées à la réalisation de projet intégrée et à la communication ouverte. Les initiatives et leur efficacité sont étudiées plus avant dans le contexte élargi international des pratiques professionnelles d'excellence émergentes. Les clients appartenant au secteur public sont des agents clés pour inciter et amener au changement, en particulier par le renforcement des capacités chez les autres fournisseurs et cabinets de services professionnels. Les clients appartenant au secteur public peuvent étendre davantage encore leur sphère d'influence positive, tout particulièrement s'agissant de l'évaluation et de l'intégration des technologies émergentes et de l'extension des marchés professionnels relatifs aux performances des bâtiments et aux engagements des occupants. Mots clés: cadre bâti, leadership clients, innovation, réalisation de projet intégrée, pratique professionnelle, construction durable

[1]  Fred Block,et al.  State of Innovation: The U.S. Government's Role in Technology Development , 2010 .

[2]  R. Judkoff,et al.  Evaluation of the Low-Energy Design Process and Energy Performance of the Zion National Park Visitor Center: Preprint , 2005 .

[3]  Martin Sexton,et al.  Performance-based building and innovation: balancing client and industry needs , 2005 .

[4]  Bill Bordass,et al.  Making feedback and post-occupancy evaluation routine 2: Soft landings – involving design and building teams in improving performance , 2005 .

[5]  Raymond E. Levitt,et al.  CEM Research for the Next 50 Years: Maximizing Economic, Environmental, and Societal Value of the Built Environment , 2007 .

[6]  From a Cause to a Style: Modernist Architecture's Encounter with the American City , 2007 .

[7]  Rod Mahdavi Wireless Sensor Network for Improving the Energy Efficiency of Data Centers , 2014 .

[8]  Mirkka Rekola,et al.  Towards Integrated Design and Delivery Solutions: Pinpointed Challenges of Process Change , 2010 .

[9]  Bart Bossink,et al.  Managing drivers of innovation in construction networks , 2004 .

[10]  Paul Torcellini,et al.  Energy Use Intensity and its Influence on the Integrated Daylighting Design of a Large Net Zero Energy Building , 2011 .

[11]  Kevin Kampschroer,et al.  The strategic workplace: development and evaluation , 2005 .

[12]  George Atkinson Construction Quality and Quality Standards: The European perspective , 1995 .

[13]  Robert Owen,et al.  Challenges for Integrated Design and Delivery Solutions , 2010 .

[14]  Bart Bossink,et al.  Leadership for sustainable innovation , 2007 .

[15]  Angela Mazzi,et al.  THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS , 2007 .

[16]  Obata Kassabaum Hellmuth,et al.  The HOK guidebook to sustainable design , 2000 .

[17]  Charles R. Glagola,et al.  Partnering on Defense Contracts , 2002 .

[18]  Lars Lisell,et al.  SolOpt: A Novel Approach to Solar Rooftop Optimization , 2011 .

[19]  Jerry Yudelson,et al.  Green Building Trends: Europe , 2009 .