Heuristic Optimization Based on Penalty Approach for Surface Permanent Magnet Synchronous Machines

This paper aims to provide a smart design to improve the efficiency of surface permanent magnet synchronous motor. An efficient design strategy involving penalty approaches are considered for extracting all the possible parameter combinations and the solutions in the infeasible region. We compare the performance of tree heuristic optimization algorithms and six penalty methods. The heuristic optimization algorithms are: particle swarm optimization, differential search algorithm, and tree seed algorithm. The penalty methods are: three of which are static penalty approaches, two of dynamic penalty approaches, and Deb’s rule. Besides, the optimized motor design is tested with finite element analysis. Two conclusions were drawn from the experiments. First, heuristic algorithms using penalty approaches had significantly better performance compared to standard and popular heuristic algorithms. This emphasizes the importance of using heuristic algorithms with penalty approaches in SPMSM design optimization. Second, the compatibility of design optimization and numerical analysis results are acceptable and highly satisfactory for surface permanent magnet synchronous motor design. According to the analytical design, a 4% improvement in efficiency was achieved with the proposed approach.

[1]  Zeger Bontinck,et al.  Robust shape optimization of electric devices based on deterministic optimization methods and finite-element analysis with affine parametrization and design elements , 2018, Electrical Engineering.

[2]  Andrea Cavagnino,et al.  Modern Electrical Machine Design Optimization: Techniques, Trends, and Best Practices , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[3]  Jaejin Lee,et al.  Iterative LDPC-LDPC product code for bit patterned media , 2016, 2016 Asia-Pacific Magnetic Recording Conference Digest (APMRC).

[4]  Syed Omer Gilani,et al.  Link Adaptation for Maximizing MI of Hybrid Optical/RF Communication System , 2017, FNC/MobiSPC.

[5]  Riccardo Poli,et al.  Particle swarm optimization , 1995, Swarm Intelligence.

[6]  Cheng-Tsung Liu,et al.  Optimal Design of an SPM Motor Using Genetic Algorithms and Taguchi Method , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[7]  Jinji Sun,et al.  Thermal–structure coupling analysis and multi-objective optimization of motor rotor in MSPMSM , 2019, Chinese Journal of Aeronautics.

[8]  S.D. Sudhoff,et al.  Population-Based Design of Surface-Mounted Permanent-Magnet Synchronous Machines , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion.

[9]  Rasmus K. Ursem,et al.  Parameter identification of induction motors using stochastic optimization algorithms , 2004, Appl. Soft Comput..

[10]  Juliette Soulard,et al.  Design Study of Different Direct-Driven Permanent-Magnet Motors for a Low Speed Application , 2004 .

[11]  K. O. Boynov,et al.  The Effect of PWM on Rotor Eddy-Current Losses in High-Speed Permanent Magnet Machines , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[12]  Juha Pyrhonen,et al.  Selection of Geometric Design Variables for Fine Numerical Optimizations of Electrical Machines , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[13]  Ayman M. El-Refaie,et al.  Fractional-Slot Concentrated-Windings Synchronous Permanent Magnet Machines: Opportunities and Challenges , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[14]  N. Bianchi,et al.  A General Approach to Determine the Rotor Losses in Three-Phase Fractional-Slot PM Machines , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Electric Machines & Drives Conference.

[15]  Xiaoyu Liu,et al.  Optimal Design of Permanent Magnet Arrangement in Synchronous Motors , 2017 .

[16]  Pinar Civicioglu,et al.  Transforming geocentric cartesian coordinates to geodetic coordinates by using differential search algorithm , 2012, Comput. Geosci..

[17]  K. Deb An Efficient Constraint Handling Method for Genetic Algorithms , 2000 .

[18]  Kok Lay Teo,et al.  An exact penalty function-based differential search algorithm for constrained global optimization , 2015, Soft Computing.

[19]  Yvonnick Le Menach,et al.  Optimization of Low-Power Line-Start PM Motor Using Gray Wolf Metaheuristic Algorithm , 2020, Energies.

[20]  James A. R. Marshall,et al.  Swarm Cognition: an interdisciplinary approach to the study of self-organising biological collectives , 2011, Swarm Intelligence.

[21]  Raja Ram Kumar,et al.  Design, analysis and optimization of permanent magnet synchronous generator , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Power Electronics, Drives and Energy Systems (PEDES).

[22]  Andrzej Demenko,et al.  Influence of the shape of squirrel-cage bars on the dimensions of permanent magnets in an optimized line-start permanent magnet synchronous motor , 2017 .

[23]  Mohsin Jamil,et al.  Adaptive hybrid free space optical/radio frequency communication system , 2017, Telecommun. Syst..

[24]  Osman Bilgin,et al.  Comparison of stochastic optimization methods for design optimization of permanent magnet synchronous motor , 2011, Neural Computing and Applications.

[25]  Ángel Fernando Kuri Morales,et al.  Penalty Function Methods for Constrained Optimization with Genetic Algorithms: A Statistical Analysis , 2002, MICAI.

[26]  Scott D. Sudhoff,et al.  Design Optimization of Asymmetric Salient Permanent Magnet Synchronous Machines , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion.

[27]  Ingo Hahn,et al.  Heuristic Structural Optimization of the Permanent Magnets Used in a Surface Mounted Permanent-Magnet Synchronous Machine , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[28]  Dahaman Ishak,et al.  Optimization of surface-mounted permanent magnet brushless AC motor using analytical model and differential evolution algorithm , 2019, Journal of Electrical Engineering.

[29]  Lhassane Idoumghar,et al.  Hybrid Differential Evolution Algorithm Employed for the Optimum Design of a High-Speed PMSM Used for EV Propulsion , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[30]  Khoa D. Nguyen,et al.  Puncturing optimization algorithm and its applications in free space communications , 2013, 2013 Australian Communications Theory Workshop (AusCTW).

[31]  Mustafa Servet Kiran,et al.  TSA: Tree-seed algorithm for continuous optimization , 2015, Expert Syst. Appl..

[32]  Nicola Bianchi,et al.  Design optimisation of electric motors by genetic algorithms , 1998 .

[33]  Jong-Wook Kim,et al.  Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm With Intelligent Particle Number Control for Optimal Design of Electric Machines , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[34]  Vladimir Kindl,et al.  Design of a high-speed permanent magnet synchronous motor for electric kart , 2017 .

[35]  Chae-Lim Jeong,et al.  Optimized Design of PMSM With Hybrid-Type Permanent Magnet for Improving Performance and Reliability , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications.

[36]  Adem Alpaslan Altun,et al.  The Binary Differential Search Algorithm Approach for Solving Uncapacitated Facility Location Problems , 2017 .

[37]  Syed Omer Gilani,et al.  Maximizing Throughput of Hybrid FSO-RF Communication System: An Algorithm , 2018, IEEE Access.

[38]  K Hameyer,et al.  Automated Virtual Prototyping of Permanent Magnet Synchronous Machines for HEVs , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[39]  J. Hur,et al.  Optimization Design of PMSM With Hybrid-Type Permanent Magnet Considering Irreversible Demagnetization , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[40]  Khoa D. Nguyen,et al.  Link adaptation of FAHOR communication system , 2012, 2012 Australian Communications Theory Workshop (AusCTW).

[41]  Tao Wang,et al.  Optimization design of an interior permanent-magnet synchronous machine for a hybrid hydraulic excavator , 2015, Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering.

[42]  Christopher R. Houck,et al.  On the use of non-stationary penalty functions to solve nonlinear constrained optimization problems with GA's , 1994, Proceedings of the First IEEE Conference on Evolutionary Computation. IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence.

[43]  Duane C. Hanselman,et al.  Brushless Permanent-Magnet Motor Design , 1994 .