Movement characteristics using a mouse with tactile and force feedback

Abstract A multi-modal mouse incorporating tactile and force feedback was tested in a target selection task with 12 subjects. Four feedback conditions (normal, tactile, force, tactile+force) were combined with three target distances and three target sizes. We found significant reductions in the overall movement times and in the time to stop the cursor after entering the target. This effect was particularly pronounced for the tactile condition and for small targets. However, compared to normal feedback, error rates were higher with the tactile and tactile+force conditions. The motor-sensory bandwidth calculated using Fitt's law, normalized for spatial variability, was highest in the presence of tactile feedback (6.4 bits/s). This was followed by tactile+force (6.2 bits/s), normal (5.9 bits /s), and force feedback (5.8 bits/s). These results indicate that modifying a mouse to include tactile feedback, and to a lesser extent, force feedback, offers performance advantages in target selection tasks.

[1]  J. Voelcker,et al.  Of mice and menus: designing the user-friendly interface , 1989, IEEE Spectrum.

[2]  M Akamatsu,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article Ergonomics a Comparison of Tactile, Auditory, and Visual Feedback in a Pointing Task Using a Mouse-type Device , 2022 .

[3]  Hiroo Iwata,et al.  Artificial reality with force-feedback: development of desktop virtual space with compact master manipulator , 1990, SIGGRAPH.

[4]  Ronald M. Baecker,et al.  Readings in human-computer interaction : toward the year 2000 , 1995 .

[5]  Frederick P. Brooks,et al.  Feeling and seeing: issues in force display , 1990, I3D '90.

[6]  P. Fitts The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[7]  Jeff A. Johnson,et al.  The Xerox Star: a retrospective , 1989, Computer.

[8]  Jock D. Mackinlay,et al.  A morphological analysis of the design space of input devices , 1991, TOIS.

[9]  A. T. Welford,et al.  The fundamentals of skill , 1968 .

[10]  Jaron Lanier,et al.  A hand gesture interface device , 1987, CHI 1987.

[11]  Douglas C. Engelbart,et al.  Display-Selection Techniques for Text Manipulation , 1967 .

[12]  Motoyuki Akamatsu,et al.  A multi-modal mouse with tactile and force feedback , 1994, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[13]  Motoyuki Akamatsu,et al.  Multimodal Mouse: A Mouse-Type Device with Tactile and Force Display , 1994, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[14]  James C. Bliss,et al.  Optical-to-Tactile Image Conversion for the Blind , 1970 .

[15]  Frederick P. Brooks,et al.  Project GROPEHaptic displays for scientific visualization , 1990, SIGGRAPH.

[16]  F. L. Engel,et al.  Improved efficiency through I- and E-feedback: a trackball with contextual force feedback , 1994, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..