How does environmental regulation break the resource curse: Theoretical and empirical study on China

Abstract This paper incorporates environmental regulation, resource development and economic growth into a unified framework, and introduces a four-sector endogenous growth model, including environmental protection sector and resource development sector. Then, the resource curse coefficients of 232 prefecture-level cities in China are estimated based on the data of China's Industrial Enterprise Database from 1998 to 2013. Finally, the breaking effect of environmental regulation on the resource curse and its internal mechanism are empirically examined. The results show that the resource curse effect mainly occurs in the inland cities of the central and western regions and the northeast region; while the phenomenon of resource curse does not exist in most coastal and eastern cities, only a few cities are in the marginal resource curse areas and serious resource curse areas. The relationship between environmental regulation and the resource curse coefficient presents an inverted U-shaped curve, and only when the environmental regulation intensity crosses the turning point can environmental regulation break the resource curse. Environmental regulation can also indirectly break the resource curse phenomenon in full samples by improving green technological innovation level, lowering resource dependence and accelerating manufacturing development. However, the manufacturing development effect of environmental regulation on the resource curse has not yet been found in the resource curse areas.

[1]  Huang Jian-hua.  Resource Curse from the Perspective of Eco-efficiency:Comparison of Resource-dependent Regions and Resource-utilizing Ones , 2015 .

[2]  Richard M. Auty,et al.  Sustaining Development in Mineral Economies: The Resource Curse Thesis , 1993 .

[3]  Xiaoliang Xu,et al.  The impact on regional “resource curse” by coal resource tax reform in China—A dynamic CGE appraisal , 2015 .

[4]  P. Portney,et al.  Environmental Regulation and the Competitiveness of U . S . Manufacturing : What Does the Evidence Tell Us ? , 1999 .

[5]  Adam B. Jaffe,et al.  Environmental Regulation and the Competitiveness of U.S. Manufacturing: What Does the Evidence Tell Us? , 1995 .

[6]  C. Nondo,et al.  Economic Growth and Environmental Regulations: A Simultaneous Equation Estimation , 2012 .

[7]  M. Chan,et al.  Demographic Change, Savings, Investment, and Economic Growth , 2012 .

[8]  J. Emery,et al.  Is a negative correlation between resource abundance and growth sufficient evidence that there is a “resource curse”? , 2011 .

[9]  M. Islam,et al.  Economic Freedom and Productivity Growth in Resource-rich Economies , 2015 .

[10]  Yessengali Oskenbayev,et al.  Resource concentration, institutional quality and the natural resource curse , 2013 .

[11]  E. Mohammadi,et al.  Natural resource dependence and economic growth: A TOPSIS/DEA analysis of innovation efficiency , 2018, Resources Policy.

[12]  Thorvaldur Gylfason,et al.  Natural Resources and Economic Growth: The Role of Investment , 2001 .

[13]  Xiaoliang Xu,et al.  The research on generalized regional “resource curse” in China's new normal stage , 2016 .

[14]  John Steen,et al.  How environmental regulations affect innovation in the Australian oil and gas industry: going beyond the Porter Hypothesis , 2014 .