Parietal transcranial direct current stimulation modulates primary motor cortex excitability

The posterior parietal cortex is part of the cortical network involved in motor learning and is structurally and functionally connected with the primary motor cortex (M1). Neuroplastic alterations of neuronal connectivity might be an important basis for learning processes. These have however not been explored for parieto‐motor connections in humans by transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Exploring tDCS effects on parieto‐motor cortical connectivity might be functionally relevant, because tDCS has been shown to improve motor learning. We aimed to explore plastic alterations of parieto‐motor cortical connections by tDCS in healthy humans. We measured neuroplastic changes of corticospinal excitability via motor evoked potentials (MEP) elicited by single‐pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) before and after tDCS over the left posterior parietal cortex (P3), and 3 cm posterior or lateral to P3, to explore the spatial specificity of the effects. Furthermore, short‐interval intracortical inhibition/intracortical facilitation (SICI/ICF) over M1, and parieto‐motor cortical connectivity were obtained before and after P3 tDCS. The results show polarity‐dependent M1 excitability alterations primarily after P3 tDCS. Single‐pulse TMS‐elicited MEPs, M1 SICI/ICF at 5 and 7 ms and 10 and 15 ms interstimulus intervals (ISIs), and parieto‐motor connectivity at 10 and 15 ms ISIs were all enhanced by anodal stimulation. Single pulse‐TMS‐elicited MEPs, and parieto‐motor connectivity at 10 and 15 ms ISIs were reduced by cathodal tDCS. The respective corticospinal excitability alterations lasted for at least 120 min after stimulation. These results show an effect of remote stimulation of parietal areas on M1 excitability. The spatial specificity of the effects and the impact on parietal cortex–motor cortex connections suggest a relevant connectivity‐driven effect.

[1]  M. Hallett,et al.  Dynamic cortical involvement in implicit and explicit motor sequence learning. A PET study. , 1998, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[2]  Peter Kirsch,et al.  Induction and quantification of prefrontal cortical network plasticity using 5 Hz rTMS and fMRI , 2014, Human brain mapping.

[3]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans , 2001, Neurology.

[4]  P. Matthews,et al.  Polarity-Sensitive Modulation of Cortical Neurotransmitters by Transcranial Stimulation , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  Walter Paulus,et al.  Facilitation of visuo‐motor learning by transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor and extrastriate visual areas in humans , 2004, The European journal of neuroscience.

[6]  Walter Paulus,et al.  Modulation of cortical excitability by weak direct current stimulation--technical, safety and functional aspects. , 2003, Supplements to Clinical neurophysiology.

[7]  J. Donoghue,et al.  Learning-induced LTP in neocortex. , 2000, Science.

[8]  J. Rothwell,et al.  TMS investigations into the task-dependent functional interplay between human posterior parietal and motor cortex , 2009, Behavioural Brain Research.

[9]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Functional Mapping of Sequence Learning in Normal Humans , 1995, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[10]  A. Schnitzler,et al.  1Hz rTMS of the left posterior parietal cortex (PPC) modifies sensorimotor timing , 2012, Neuropsychologia.

[11]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Consensus: Motor cortex plasticity protocols , 2008, Brain Stimulation.

[12]  T. Ilić,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation , 2008, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[13]  C. Caltagirone,et al.  Theta-burst stimulation of the left hemisphere accelerates recovery of hemispatial neglect , 2012, Neurology.

[14]  Walter Paulus,et al.  Shaping the optimal repetition interval for cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  A. Nambu,et al.  Organization of nonprimary motor cortical inputs on pyramidal and nonpyramidal tract neurons of primary motor cortex: An electrophysiological study in the macaque monkey. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[16]  Wei-Hung Chen,et al.  Low-frequency rTMS over lateral premotor cortex induces lasting changes in regional activation and functional coupling of cortical motor areas , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[17]  R. Lemon,et al.  Cortical afferents and efferents of monkey postarcuate area: an anatomical and electrophysiological study , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[18]  Viviana Versace,et al.  In vivo definition of parieto-motor connections involved in planning of grasping movements , 2010, NeuroImage.

[19]  Mark Hallett,et al.  Interhemispheric plasticity in humans. , 2011, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[20]  Abhishek Datta,et al.  Physiological and modeling evidence for focal transcranial electrical brain stimulation in humans: A basis for high-definition tDCS , 2013, NeuroImage.

[21]  D. Veniero,et al.  Paired Associative Stimulation Enforces the Communication between Interconnected Areas , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  Giuseppe Pagnoni,et al.  Altered resting-state effective connectivity of fronto-parietal motor control systems on the primary motor network following stroke , 2012, NeuroImage.

[23]  M. A. Nitsche,et al.  Modulation kortikaler Erregbarkeit beim Menschen durch transkranielle Gleichstromstimulation , 2002, Der Nervenarzt.

[24]  M. Hallett,et al.  A finite element analysis of the effect of electrode area and inter-electrode distance on the spatial distribution of the current density in tDCS , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.

[25]  Walter Paulus,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation--update 2011. , 2011, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.

[26]  Mark Hallett,et al.  Timing-dependent modulation of the posterior parietal cortex-primary motor cortex pathway by sensorimotor training. , 2012, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  Alexander Münchau,et al.  Premotor transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) affects primary motor excitability in humans , 2008, The European journal of neuroscience.

[28]  D. Liebetanz,et al.  Modulating parameters of excitability during and after transcranial direct current stimulation of the human motor cortex , 2005, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[29]  T. Milner,et al.  Functionally Specific Changes in Resting-State Sensorimotor Networks after Motor Learning , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[30]  Ethan R. Buch,et al.  Cortical and subcortical interactions during action reprogramming and their related white matter pathways , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  Uwe Herwig,et al.  Using the International 10-20 EEG System for Positioning of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , 2004, Brain Topography.

[32]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Modulating cortico‐striatal and thalamo‐cortical functional connectivity with transcranial direct current stimulation , 2012, Human brain mapping.

[33]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Attention and stimulus characteristics determine the locus of motor-sequence encoding. A PET study. , 1997, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[34]  V. Gracco,et al.  Sensorimotor integration for speech motor learning involves the inferior parietal cortex , 2011, The European journal of neuroscience.

[35]  J. Donoghue,et al.  Strengthening of horizontal cortical connections following skill learning , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[36]  L. Cohen,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation: State of the art 2008 , 2008, Brain Stimulation.

[37]  John C. Rothwell,et al.  Behavioral/systems/cognitive Functional Interplay between Posterior Parietal and Ipsilateral Motor Cortex Revealed by Twin-coil Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation during Reach Planning toward Contralateral Space , 2022 .

[38]  M. Bear,et al.  LTP and LTD An Embarrassment of Riches , 2004, Neuron.

[39]  Giacomo Koch,et al.  Hebbian and Anti-Hebbian Spike-Timing-Dependent Plasticity of Human Cortico-Cortical Connections , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[40]  M. Nitsche,et al.  [Modulation of cortical excitability by transcranial direct current stimulation]. , 2002, Der Nervenarzt.

[41]  Mark Hallett,et al.  Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation or transcranial direct current stimulation? , 2009, Brain Stimulation.

[42]  G. Fink,et al.  Bidirectional alterations of interhemispheric parietal balance by non-invasive cortical stimulation. , 2009, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[43]  Giacomo Koch,et al.  Focal Stimulation of the Posterior Parietal Cortex Increases the Excitability of the Ipsilateral Motor Cortex , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[44]  Ethan R. Buch,et al.  Noninvasive cortical stimulation enhances motor skill acquisition over multiple days through an effect on consolidation , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[45]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Facilitation of Implicit Motor Learning by Weak Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Primary Motor Cortex in the Human , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[46]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation , 2000, The Journal of physiology.

[47]  Rainer W. Paine,et al.  Mapping Different Intra-Hemispheric Parietal-Motor Networks Using Twin Coil TMS , 2013, Brain Stimulation.

[48]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Abstract and Effector-Specific Representations of Motor Sequences Identified with PET , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[49]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Hyperexcitability of parietal-motor functional connections in the intact left-hemisphere of patients with neglect. , 2008, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[50]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Safety criteria for transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in humans , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.