Lead User Identification through Twitter: Case Study for Camera Lens Products

Lead users are a significant segment of the user population that exhibit product use related needs that cannot be met by existing commercially available solutions. They expect high benefits from actively engaging in innovation activities. To identify lead users, researchers have looked to the Web as a potential source of lead users. This paper discusses identification of lead users on the social networking site Twitter using a validated online questionnaire, that explores various facets of being a lead user including speed of product adoption, technical expertise, dissatisfaction with commercially available solutions, opinion leadership and innovation activity. The results of the documented study show that lead users in the case of lens products have a presence on Twitter and they support further exploration of automated and systematic online approaches to finding and identifying lead users, a crucial step at the fuzzy front end of innovation.

[1]  P. Bentler.  Comparative Fit Indices in Structural Models , 1990 .

[2]  Christian Lüthje.  Characteristics of Innovating Users in a Consumer Goods Field: An Empirical Study of Sport-Related Product Consumers , 2002 .

[3]  Gary L. Lilien,et al.  Performance Assessment of the Lead User Idea-Generation Process for New Product Development , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[4]  David A. de Vaus,et al.  Surveys in Social Research , 1996 .

[5]  E. Hippel,et al.  Lead users: a source of novel product concepts , 1986 .

[6]  Christopher Lettl,et al.  Distinctive Roles of Lead Users and Opinion Leaders in the Social Networks of Schoolchildren , 2009 .

[7]  Volker Bilgram,et al.  User-Centric Innovations in New Product Development - Systematic Identification of Lead Users Harnes , 2008 .

[8]  John O. Summers,et al.  Overlap of Opinion Leadership across Consumer Product Categories , 1970 .

[9]  R. Peterson.  A Meta-analysis of Cronbach's Coefficient Alpha , 1994 .

[10]  E. Hippel.  The dominant role of users in the scientific instrument innovation process , 1993 .

[11]  Satish Nambisan,et al.  DESIGNING VIRTUAL CUSTOMER ENVIRONMENTS FOR NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT : TOWARD A THEORY , 2005 .

[12]  E. Hippel.  Successful Industrial Products from Customer Ideas , 1978 .

[13]  Sonali K. Shah,et al.  How Communities Support Innovative Activities: An Exploration of Assistance and Sharing Among End-Users , 2003 .

[14]  Eric von Hippel,et al.  Finding Commercially Attractive User Innovations: A Test of Lead User Theory , 2005 .

[15]  Frank-Martin Belz,et al.  Netnography as a Method of Lead User Identification , 2010 .

[16]  Reinhard Prügl,et al.  Extending Lead User Theory: Antecedents and Consequences of Consumers' Lead Userness , 2007 .

[17]  Christian Homburg,et al.  Does Customer Interaction Enhance New Product Success , 2000 .

[18]  D. Littler.  Design and Marketing of New Products , 1981 .

[19]  John Roberts,et al.  The nature of lead users and measurement of leading edge status , 2004 .

[20]  H. Ernst,et al.  Identification of Lead Users for Consumer Products via Virtual Stock Markets , 2009 .

[21]  Gilbert A. Churchill,et al.  Marketing Research: Methodological Foundations , 1976 .

[22]  M. Browne,et al.  Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit , 1992 .

[23]  Terry L. Childers.  Assessment of the Psychometric Properties of an Opinion Leadership Scale , 1986 .

[24]  J. Krosnick,et al.  MAIL SURVEYS FOR ELECTION FORECASTING?AN EVALUATION OF THE COLUMBUS DISPATCH POLL , 1996 .

[25]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[26]  Reinhard Prügl,et al.  Lead users and the adoption and diffusion of new products: Insights from two extreme sports communities , 2006 .

[27]  Glen L. Urban,et al.  Lead User Analyses for the Development of New Industrial Products , 1988 .

[28]  Cornelius Herstatt,et al.  The Dominant Role of , 2002 .