Effects of acoustic radiation force and shear waves for absorption and stiffness sensing in ultrasound modulated optical tomography.

Ultrasound-modulated optical tomography (UOT) combines optical contrast with ultrasound spatial resolution and has great potential for soft tissue functional imaging. One current problem with this technique is the weak optical modulation signal, primarily due to strong optical scattering in diffuse media and minimal acoustically induced modulation. The acoustic radiation force (ARF) can create large particle displacements in tissue and has been shown to be able to improve optical modulation signals. However, shear wave propagation induced by the ARF can be a significant source of nonlocal optical modulation which may reduce UOT spatial resolution and contrast. In this paper, the time evolution of shear waves was examined on tissue mimicking-phantoms exposed to 5 MHz ultrasound and 532 nm optical radiation and measured with a CCD camera. It has been demonstrated that by generating an ARF with an acoustic burst and adjusting both the timing and the exposure time of the CCD measurement, optical contrast and spatial resolution can be improved by ~110% and ~40% respectively when using the ARF rather than 5 MHz ultrasound alone. Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that this technique simultaneously detects both optical and mechanical contrast in the medium and the optical and mechanical contrast can be distinguished by adjusting the CCD exposure time.

[1]  H. J. van Staveren,et al.  Light scattering in Intralipid-10% in the wavelength range of 400-1100 nm. , 1991, Applied optics.

[2]  T. Krouskop,et al.  Phantom materials for elastography , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[3]  J F Greenleaf,et al.  Probing the dynamics of tissue at low frequencies with the radiation force of ultrasound. , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  Lihong V. Wang Ultrasound-Mediated Biophotonic Imaging: A Review of Acousto-Optical Tomography and Photo-Acoustic Tomography , 2004, Disease markers.

[5]  M. Fatemi,et al.  Comparison of stress field forming methods for vibro-acoustography , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[6]  Chulhong Kim,et al.  Intense acoustic bursts as a signal-enhancement mechanism in ultrasound-modulated optical tomography. , 2006, Optics letters.

[7]  Mickael Tanter,et al.  Transient optoelastography in optically diffusive media , 2007 .

[8]  Roger J. Zemp,et al.  Ultrasound-modulated optical tomography with intense acoustic bursts , 2007 .

[9]  V. Humphrey,et al.  Ultrasound and matter--physical interactions. , 2007, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[10]  Donald D Duncan,et al.  Detrimental effects of speckle-pixel size matching in laser speckle contrast imaging. , 2008, Optics letters.

[11]  Emmanuel Bossy,et al.  Detection and discrimination of optical absorption and shear stiffness at depth in tissue-mimicking phantoms by transient optoelastography , 2009 .

[12]  Parallel detection of amplitude-modulated, ultrasound-modulated optical signals. , 2010, Optics letters.

[13]  D. Elson,et al.  Photoacoustics, thermoacoustics, and acousto-optics for biomedical imaging , 2010, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.