Assessing the performances of low impact development alternatives by long-term simulation for a semi-arid area in Tianjin, northern China.

For areas that are urbanized rapidly, the practice of low impact development (LID) has gained an important place in stormwater management and urban planning due to its capability and beneficial effects in restoring the original hydrological cycle. The performances of LID alternatives can vary substantially due to different climate conditions. This study investigated the performances of five LID alternatives under a semi-arid climate in northern China on water balance and flood control. A numerical model, Storm Water Management Model version 5 (US Environmental Protection Agency), was employed to run 10 years' rainfall events for these objectives. Two evaluation methods were proposed in this study: the efficiency index for water balance and a performance radar chart. The investigation of the five LID alternatives revealed that these LID alternatives functioned differently in flood control and water balance, and porous pavement performed best in all indices except the lag time. The two evaluation methods, in conjunction with the long-term numerical simulation, can facilitate design and decision making by providing a clear picture of the performance and functions for these LID alternatives.

[1]  Mark Hood,et al.  Comparison of Stormwater Lag Times for Low Impact and Traditional Residential Development 1 , 2007 .

[2]  E. Zechman,et al.  Simulation of Combined Best Management Practices and Low Impact Development for Sustainable Stormwater Management 1 , 2010 .

[3]  A. R. Jarrett,et al.  Evaluating bioretention hydrology and nutrient removal at three field sites in North Carolina , 2006 .

[4]  Haiyang Li,et al.  Analysis on LID for highly urbanized areas' waterlogging control: demonstrated on the example of Caohejing in Shanghai. , 2013, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[5]  Steven J. Burian,et al.  Hydrologic modeling analysis of a passive, residential rainwater harvesting program in an urbanized, semi-arid watershed , 2014 .

[6]  William F Hunt,et al.  Improving bioretention/biofiltration performance with restorative maintenance. , 2012, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[7]  Bruno Tassin,et al.  Rainwater harvesting to control stormwater runoff in suburban areas. An experimental case-study , 2012 .

[8]  Soyoung Lee,et al.  Performance comparison between infiltration and non-infiltration type of structural stormwater treatment systems. , 2012, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[9]  D. B. Jennings,et al.  Changes in anthropogenic impervious surfaces, precipitation and daily streamflow discharge: a historical perspective in a mid-atlantic subwatershed , 2002, Landscape Ecology.

[10]  A. Davis Green engineering principles promote low-impact development. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[11]  Betty T. Rushton Low Impact Parking Lot Design Reduces Runoff and Pollutant Loads , 1999 .

[12]  James C. Y. Guo,et al.  Incentive Index Developed to Evaluate Storm-Water Low-Impact Designs , 2010 .

[13]  M. Viklander,et al.  Transport of stormwater pollutants through a roadside grassed swale , 2006 .

[14]  R. Pitt Small Storm Hydrology and Why it is Important for the Design of Stormwater Control Practices , 1999 .

[15]  Michael E. Dietz,et al.  Stormwater runoff and export changes with development in a traditional and low impact subdivision. , 2008, Journal of environmental management.

[16]  C. Jackson,et al.  URBANIZATION OF AQUATIC SYSTEMS: DEGRADATION THRESHOLDS, STORMWATER DETECTION, AND THE LIMITS OF MITIGATION 1 , 1997 .

[17]  A. H. Elliott,et al.  A review of models for low impact urban stormwater drainage , 2007, Environ. Model. Softw..