Time-Space Clustering of Human Brucellosis,

Infection with Brucella spp. continues to pose a human health risk in California despite great strides in eradicating the disease from domestic animals. Clustering of human cases in time and space has important public health implications for understanding risk factors and sources of infection. Temporal-spatial clustering of human brucellosis in California for the 20-year period 1973–1992 was evaluated by the Ederer-Myers-Mantel, Moran’s I, and population-adjusted Moran’s I procedures. Cases were clustered in concentrated agricultural regions in the first 5-year interval (1973–1977). Time-space clustering of human brucellosis cases in California late in the 20-year study period may reflect the distribution of Hispanic populations. Public health programs in California should focus on educating Hispanic populations about the risk of consuming dairy products, such as soft cheeses, made from unpasteurized milk. rucellosis is associated with chronic debilitating infections in humans and reproductive failure in domestic animals (1–3). Person-to-person transmission of brucellae is extremely rare (2,4), and human infection may be an accidental expression of a more widespread problem in animals (5). Brucella species considered important agents of human disease are B. abortus (primary reservoir in cattle), B. melitensis (sheep and goats), and B. suis (swine) (6). B. melitensis and B. suis are considered more pathogenic for humans than B. abortus (7).

[1]  M. J. Corbel,et al.  Brucellosis: an overview. , 1997, Emerging infectious diseases.

[2]  E. J. Young,et al.  An overview of human brucellosis. , 1995, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[3]  N. Oden,et al.  Adjusting Moran's I for population density. , 1995, Statistics in medicine.

[4]  B. Chomel,et al.  Changing trends in the epidemiology of human brucellosis in California from 1973 to 1992: a shift toward foodborne transmission. , 1994, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[5]  M. Corbel Microbiological Aspects of Brucellosis , 1993 .

[6]  M R Becklake,et al.  Epidemiology and surveillance. , 1990, Chest.

[7]  J. Taylor,et al.  The changing epidemiology of human brucellosis in Texas, 1977-1986. , 1989, American journal of epidemiology.

[8]  J. Huber,et al.  Comparison of the results of card, rivanol, complement-fixation, and milk ring tests with the isolation rate of Brucella abortus from cattle. , 1986, American journal of veterinary research.

[9]  M. Eckman Brucellosis linked to Mexican cheese. , 1975, JAMA.

[10]  S. L. Hendricks,et al.  Brucellosis in the United States, 1960-1972; An abattoir-associated disease. Part III. Epidemiology and evidence for acquired immunity. , 1974, Medicine.

[11]  R. Feldman,et al.  BRUCELLOSIS IN THE UNITED STATES, 1960-1972: AN ABATTOIR-ASSOCIATED DISEASE , 1974, Medicine.

[12]  R. Parker,et al.  Brucellosis in the United States. , 1972, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[13]  Nathan Mantel,et al.  A Statistical Problem in Space and Time: Do Leukemia Cases Come in Clusters? , 1964 .

[14]  P. Moran Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena. , 1950, Biometrika.

[15]  P. Nicoletti Control, eradication and prevention , 2001 .

[16]  P. Nicoletti Brucellosis in animals , 2001 .

[17]  H. Qubain,et al.  Diagnosis and treatment of 106 cases of human brucellosis. , 1990, The Journal of infection.