Judging social issues: difficulties, inconsistencies, and consistencies.

The three studies reported in this Monograph examine high school and college students' reasoning about the issues of abortion, homosexuality, pornography, and incest. The studies stemmed from previous research on reasoning in the "prototypical" moral, social conventional, and personal domains. We postulated that abortion, homosexuality, pornography, and incest are nonprototypical issues. We expected that reasoning about nonprototypical and prototypical issues would differ and that reasoning about nonprototypical issues would be inconsistent and involve ambiguities in informational assumptions. Two groups were preselected in Study 1, those who negatively and those who positively evaluated the nonprototypical issues. Assessments were made of criterion judgments (evaluations, rule contingency, and generalizability) and justifications regarding moral, personal, and nonprototypical issues. The groups differed in judgments about the nonprototypical issues but not the moral issues. Both groups gave noncontigent and generalized judgments about moral issues, with justifications of justice and rights. Subjects who evaluated nonprototypical acts negatively used varied and often inconsistent configurations of criterion judgments. Responses coded for general reasoning types often entailed juxtapositions of prescriptive judgments and assertions of personal choice. Subjects who evaluated nonprototypical acts positively judged that they should be legal and nongeneralized and gave justifications based on personal choice. Using similar procedures, Study 2 was conducted with practicing Catholics attending parochial high schools. The findings paralleled those of Study 1, including a split among subjects in their evaluations of the nonprototypical issues. The results suggested a bidirectional relation between individual judgments and group positions. The findings of Studies 1 and 2 suggested that variations in evaluations and judgments about the nonprototypical issues were associated with variations in ambiguously held informational assumptions. Study 3 examined the role of such informational assumptions. It was found that assumptions associated with judgments about abortion and homosexuality were ambiguous and inconsistently applied. Thus, we propose that ambiguity around assumptions is a central component of the nonprototypicality of these issues.

[1]  Sharon Lamb,et al.  The Emergence of Morality in Young Children , 1988 .

[2]  J. Smetana.  Reasoning in the personal and moral domains: Adolescent and young adult women's decision-making regarding abortion , 1981 .

[3]  M. Spiro.  Cultural Relativism and the Future of Anthropology , 1986, Rereading Cultural Anthropology.

[4]  Elvin Hatch.  Culture and Morality: The Relativity of Values in Anthropology , 1983 .

[5]  Heinz Werner,et al.  Comparative Psychology of Mental Development , 1942 .

[6]  Larry Nucci,et al.  Sociomoral development and drug and alcohol abuse , 1991 .

[7]  J. Smetana,et al.  Adolescents' and parents' conceptions of parental authority. , 1988, Child development.

[8]  P. Berger,et al.  The Social Construction of Reality , 1966 .

[9]  J. Piaget.  The Moral Judgment of the Child , 1932 .

[10]  Goslin,et al.  Handbook of socialization theory and research , 1969 .

[11]  mile .QDurkheim mile Durkheim,et al.  The Elementary Forms of Religious Life , 1916 .

[12]  R. Enright,et al.  Handbook of Moral Behavior and Development , 1991 .

[13]  R. Pahl,et al.  The Social Construction of Communities , 1972 .

[14]  E. Turiel,et al.  Children's Concepts of Cross-Gender Activities. , 1985 .

[15]  L. Kohlberg.  Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization , 1969 .

[16]  Ronald Dworkin,et al.  Taking Rights Seriously , 1977 .

[17]  E. Turiel.  Domain-Specific Social Judgments and Domain Ambiguities. , 1989 .

[18]  E. Sampson.  Psychology and the American ideal. , 1977 .

[19]  T. Shultz,et al.  Moral Rules: Their Content and Acquisition , 1990 .

[20]  M. Killen,et al.  Children's evaluations of morality in the context of peer, teacher-child, and familial relations. , 1990, The Journal of genetic psychology.

[21]  Melanie Killen,et al.  Morality: Its structure, functions, and vagaries. , 1987 .

[22]  Richard A. Shweder,et al.  Culture and moral development. , 1990 .

[23]  J. Smetana.  Social-cognitive development: Domain distinctions and coordinations , 1983 .

[24]  Iris Levin,et al.  Stage and Structure: Reopening the Debate , 1986 .

[25]  M. Killen,et al.  Adolescent Reasoning about Drug Use , 1991 .

[26]  R. Hogan.  Theoretical egocentrism and the problem of compliance. , 1975 .

[27]  J. Piaget,et al.  The Moral Judgement of the Child , 1977 .

[28]  Massimo Piattelli-Palmarini,et al.  Language and Learning: The Debate Between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky , 1980 .

[29]  W. Kessen.  The American Child and Other Cultural Inventions. , 1979 .

[30]  Philip Davidson,et al.  The effect of stimulus familiarity on the use of criteria and justifications in children's social reasoning. , 1983 .

[31]  Jacob Cohen.  A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .

[32]  William M. Kurtines,et al.  Morality, moral behavior, and moral development , 1984 .

[33]  E. Turiel,et al.  The Development of Social Knowledge: Morality and Convention , 1983 .

[34]  Howard Gabennesch.  The Perception of Social Conventionality by Children and Adults , 1990 .

[35]  L. Tribe.  Abortion: The Clash of Absolutes , 1990 .

[36]  C. Gilligan.  In a different voice: Women's conceptions of self and of morality. , 1977 .

[37]  Allen Newell,et al.  Human Problem Solving. , 1973 .

[38]  Herbert McClosky,et al.  Dimensions of Tolerance: What Americans Believe about Civil Liberties. , 1984 .

[39]  A. Bandura,et al.  Social learning and personality development , 1964 .

[40]  Adina Schwartz,et al.  Reason and Morality , 1979 .

[41]  T. Nagel,et al.  The Rights and Wrongs of Abortion , 1974, Rights and Wrongs of Abortion.

[42]  J. Fodor.  The Modularity of mind. An essay on faculty psychology , 1986 .

[43]  J. Smetana.  Concepts of Self and Morality: Women's Reasoning About Abortion , 1982 .

[44]  Justin Manuel Aronfreed,et al.  Conduct and Conscience: The Socialization of Internalized Control Over Behavior , 1968 .