Identification Problems in the Social Sciences and Everyday Life

Econometricians have found it useful to separate the problem of empirical inference into statistical and identification components. Studies of identification determine the conclusions that could be drawn if a researcher were able to observe a data sample of unlimited size. Statistical inference seeks to characterize how sampling variability affects the conclusions that can be drawn from samples of limited size. This Association Lecture to the Southern Economic Association describes the broad themes of a research program on identification that I began in the late 1980s and continue today. I show how these themes have played out in my analysis of the selection problem, a fundamental and pervasive identification problem. I examine how the selection problem manifests itself in the econometric analysis of market demand.

[1]  Joel L. Horowitz,et al.  Identification and Robustness with Contaminated and Corrupted Data , 1995 .

[2]  C. Manski,et al.  Monotone Instrumental Variables with an Application to the Returns to Schooling , 1998 .

[3]  Daniel S. Nagin,et al.  3. Bounding Disagreements about Treatment Effects: A Case Study of Sentencing and Recidivism , 1998 .

[4]  Tjalling C. Koopmans,et al.  Identification problems in economic model construction , 1949 .

[5]  Charles F. Manski,et al.  Treatment Choice Under Ambiguity Induced by Inferential Problems , 2002, ISIPTA.

[6]  Charles F. Manski,et al.  Identification problems and decisions under ambiguity: Empirical analysis of treatment response and normative analysis of treatment choice , 2000 .

[7]  C. Manski Partial Identification of Probability Distributions , 2003 .

[8]  Philip A. Haile,et al.  Inference with an Incomplete Model of English Auctions , 2000, Journal of Political Economy.

[9]  Marco Zaffalon Exact credal treatment of missing data , 2002 .

[10]  V. Joseph Hotz,et al.  Bounding Causal Effects Using Data from a Contaminated Natural Experiment: Analysing the Effects of Teenage Childbearing , 1997 .

[11]  C. Manski Monotone Treatment Response , 2009, Identification for Prediction and Decision.

[12]  C. Manski Anatomy of the Selection Problem , 1989 .

[13]  Charles F. Manski,et al.  The Selection Problem , 1990 .

[14]  Charles F. Manski,et al.  Censoring of Outcomes and Regressors Due to Survey Nonresponse: Identification and estimation Using Weights and Imputations , 1998 .

[15]  J. Horowitz,et al.  Nonparametric Analysis of Randomized Experiments with Missing Covariate and Outcome Data , 2000 .

[16]  Charles F. Manski,et al.  Social Learning from Private Experiences: The Dynamics of the Selection Problem , 2004 .

[17]  Christopher R. Bollinger,et al.  Bounding mean regressions when a binary regressor is mismeasured , 1996 .

[18]  Joel L. Horowitz,et al.  Imprecise identification from incomplete data , 2001, ISIPTA.

[19]  C. Manski Identification of Endogenous Social Effects: The Reflection Problem , 1993 .

[20]  C. Manski,et al.  Inference on Regressions with Interval Data on a Regressor or Outcome , 2002 .

[21]  M. Sobel,et al.  Identification Problems in the Social Sciences , 1996 .

[22]  C. Manski Nonparametric Bounds on Treatment Effects , 1989 .

[23]  Charles F. Manski,et al.  Regressions, Short and Long , 2002 .

[24]  D. Ellsberg Decision, probability, and utility: Risk, ambiguity, and the Savage axioms , 1961 .