Formalising an Understanding of User-System Misfits

Many of the difficulties users experience when working with interactive systems arise from misfits between the user's conceptualisation of the domain and device with which they are working and the conceptualisation implemented within those systems. We report an analytical technique called CASSM (Concept-based Analysis for Surface and Structural Misfits) in which such misfits can be formally represented to assist in understanding, describing and reasoning about them. CASSM draws on the framework of Cognitive Dimensions (CDs) in which many types of misfit were classified and presented descriptively, with illustrative examples. CASSM allows precise definitions of many of the CDs, expressed in terms of entities, attributes, actions and relationships. These definitions have been implemented in Cassata, a tool for automated analysis of misfits, which we introduce and describe in some detail.

[1]  Ann Blandford,et al.  Analytical usability evaluation for digital libraries: a case study , 2004, JCDL.

[2]  Cathleen Wharton,et al.  The cognitive walkthrough method: a practitioner's guide , 1994 .

[3]  Ann Blandford,et al.  Ontological Sketch Models: Highlighting User—System Misfits , 2004 .

[4]  Jawed I. A. Siddiqi,et al.  Formal comparisons of program modification , 2000, Proceeding 2000 IEEE International Symposium on Visual Languages.

[5]  Karen Holtzblatt,et al.  Contextual design , 1997, INTR.

[6]  Alan F. Blackwell,et al.  A Cognitive Dimensions questionnaire optimised for users , 2000, PPIG.

[7]  Thomas P. Moran,et al.  Getting into a system: External-internal task mapping analysis , 1983, CHI '83.

[8]  Ann Blandford,et al.  Multiple viewpoints on computer supported team work: a case study on ambulance dispatch. , 2002 .

[9]  Marian Petre,et al.  Usability Analysis of Visual Programming Environments: A 'Cognitive Dimensions' Framework , 1996, J. Vis. Lang. Comput..

[10]  Alan F. Blackwell,et al.  Product Design to Support User Abstractions , 2003 .

[11]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Usability inspection methods , 1994, CHI 95 Conference Companion.

[12]  Ann Blandford,et al.  Group and Individual Time Management Tools: What You Get is Not What You Need , 2001, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[13]  Alan F. Blackwell,et al.  Cognitive Dimensions of Information Artefacts: a tutorial , 1998 .

[14]  Alan F. Blackwell,et al.  CHAPTER 5 – Notational Systems—The Cognitive Dimensions of Notations Framework , 2003 .

[15]  David Benyon,et al.  The skull beneath the skin: entity-relationship models of information artifacts , 1996, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[16]  Karen Holtzblatt,et al.  Contextual design , 1997, INTR.

[17]  Andrew Howes,et al.  The Nature of Device Models: The Yoked State Space Hypothesis and Some Experiments With Text Editors , 1990, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[18]  Thomas R. G. Green,et al.  The cognitive dimension of viscosity: A sticky problem for HCI , 1990, INTERACT.

[19]  Ann Blandford,et al.  Specifying user knowledge for the design of interactive systems , 1996, Softw. Eng. J..

[20]  Thomas R. G. Green,et al.  Cognitive dimensions of notations , 1990 .

[21]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Heuristic Evaluation of Prototypes (individual) , 2022 .