Tracking by Detection for Interactive Image Augmentation in Laparoscopy

We present a system for marking, tracking and visually augmenting a deformable surgical site by the robust automatic detection of natural landmarks (image features) in laparoscopic surgery. In our system, the surgeon first selects a frame containing an organ of interest, and this is used by our system both to detect every instance of the organ in a laparoscopic video feed, and to recover the nonrigid deformations. The system then augments the video with customizable visual information such as the location of hidden or weakly visible structures (cysts, vessels, etc), or planned incision points, acquired from pre-operative or intra-operative data. Frame-rate organ detection is performed via a novel procedure that matches the current frame to the reference frame. Because laparoscopic images are known to be extremely difficult to match, we propose to use Shape-from-Shading and conformal flattening to cancel out much of the variation in appearance due to perspective foreshortening, and we then apply robust matching to the flattened surfaces. Experiments show robust tracking and detection results on a laparoscopic procedure with the uterus as target organ. As our system detects the organ in every frame, it is not impaired by target loss, contrary to most previous methods.

[1]  Daniel Pizarro-Perez,et al.  Feature-Based Deformable Surface Detection with Self-Occlusion Reasoning , 2011, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[2]  J. Marescaux,et al.  Augmented reality in laparoscopic surgical oncology. , 2011, Surgical oncology.

[3]  J. Shuhaiber,et al.  Augmented reality in surgery. , 2004, Archives of surgery.

[4]  Russell H. Taylor,et al.  Augmented reality during robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: toward real-time 3D-CT to stereoscopic video registration. , 2009, Urology.

[5]  Adrien Bartoli,et al.  Towards Live Monocular 3D Laparoscopy Using Shading and Specularity Information , 2012, IPCAI.

[6]  Ping-Sing Tsai,et al.  Shape from Shading: A Survey , 1999, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[7]  Guillermo Sapiro,et al.  Conformal Surface Parameterization for Texture Mapping , 1999 .

[8]  Matthijs C. Dorst Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints , 2011 .

[9]  Guang-Zhong Yang,et al.  A Probabilistic Framework for Tracking Deformable Soft Tissue in Minimally Invasive Surgery , 2007, MICCAI.

[10]  Bruno Lévy,et al.  Least squares conformal maps for automatic texture atlas generation , 2002, ACM Trans. Graph..

[11]  Nicholas Ayache,et al.  Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention - MICCAI 2007, 10th International Conference, Brisbane, Australia, October 29 - November 2, 2007, Proceedings, Part I , 2007, MICCAI.

[12]  Scott Schaefer,et al.  Image deformation using moving least squares , 2006, ACM Trans. Graph..

[13]  S. Seiden,et al.  Wrong-side/wrong-site, wrong-procedure, and wrong-patient adverse events: Are they preventable? , 2006, Archives of surgery.

[14]  Berthold K. P. Horn,et al.  Closed-form solution of absolute orientation using unit quaternions , 1987 .

[15]  Shing-Tung Yau,et al.  Surface classification using conformal structures , 2003, Proceedings Ninth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision.

[16]  Robert C. Bolles,et al.  Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography , 1981, CACM.