Professional development improves staff's implementation of rehabilitation programmes for children with severe-to-profound intellectual disability

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of supervisory feedback and self-management on the acquisition and generalization of correct implementation of rehabilition training programmes implemented by direct care staff. Design: A non-concurrent multiple baseline design across three trainer–trainee dyads was used. Methods: Three staff members were trained in how to implement one-to-one teaching programmes with four children with profound-to-severe intellectual disability. Staff received feedback and were taught to self-manage their (in)correct trainer behaviour. Results: Supervisory feedback and self-management increased the mean percentage correct entry behaviour and reinforcement during training. Trainer's use of entry behaviour and reinforcement generalized across settings and trainees. As levels of response prompting for three trainers were already high during baseline, no firm statements could be made concerning its acquisition and generalization. Conclusion: Staff can improve the accuracy of training as a result of feedback and/or self-management procedures in the rehabilitation of children with severe disabilities.

[1]  Jennifer L Crockett,et al.  Parent training: acquisition and generalization of discrete trials teaching skills with parents of children with autism. , 2007, Research in developmental disabilities.

[2]  L. Arco,et al.  Feedback for improving staff training and performance in behavioral treatment programs , 2008 .

[3]  E. Jahr,et al.  Current issues in staff training. , 1998, Research in developmental disabilities.

[4]  A.M.H. van Vonderen,et al.  Effectiveness of immediate verbal feedback on trainer behaviour during communication training with individuals with intellectual disability. , 2004 .

[5]  Annemarie van Vonderen,et al.  The effect of supervisory feedback, self‐recording, and graphic feedback on trainer behavior during one‐to‐one training , 2005 .

[6]  Andrew Downs,et al.  Effects of training and feedback on Discrete Trial Teaching skills and student performance. , 2008, Research in developmental disabilities.

[7]  P. Belfiore,et al.  The Role of Procedural Integrity , 2008 .

[8]  P J Watson,et al.  The non-concurrent multiple baseline across-individuals design: an extension of the traditional multiple baseline design. , 1981, Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry.

[9]  Peter Sturmey,et al.  The Effects of Instructions, Rehearsal, Modeling, and Feedback on Acquisition and Generalization of Staff Use of Discrete Trial Teaching and Student Correct Responses. , 2008 .

[10]  Jeff Sigafoos,et al.  One-To-One Training: Instructional Procedures for Learners With Developmental Disabilities , 2004 .

[11]  A. Bondy,et al.  The Picture Exchange Communication System , 2001, Behavior modification.

[12]  Training parent implementation of discrete-trial teaching: effects on generalization of parent teaching and child correct responding. , 2007, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[13]  Michele D. Mayer,et al.  Promoting the Generalization of Paraprofessional Discrete Trial Teaching Skills , 2008 .

[14]  T. Stokes,et al.  An operant pursuit of generalization , 1989 .