Free revealing and the private-collective model for innovation incentives

A central tenant of open innovation is free revealing of the detailed workings of novel products and services, so that others may use them, learn from them, and perhaps improve them as well. We explain that innovators frequently do freely reveal proprietary information and knowledge regarding both information-based products and physical products they have developed. We explain why free revealing can make good economic sense for innovators and for society as well. The article develops the case for free revealing in terms of a ‘private collective’ model of innovation incentives.

[1]  K. Arrow.  Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention , 1962 .

[2]  M. Olson,et al.  The Logic of Collective Action , 1965 .

[3]  E. Mansfield.  Industrial research and technological innovation , 1968 .

[4]  J. V. Cangh.  Introduction à Karl Marx , 1969 .

[5]  F. Scherer,et al.  The Economic Impact of the Patent System. , 1975 .

[6]  Stan N. Finkelstein,et al.  Product designs which encourage -- or discourage -- related innovation by users: an analysis of innovation in automated clinical chemistry analyzers , 1979 .

[7]  P. Oliver.  Rewards and Punishments as Selective Incentives for Collective Action: Theoretical Investigations , 1980, American Journal of Sociology.

[8]  R. Allen,et al.  Collective Invention , 1982 .

[9]  J. Hicks,et al.  The economics of science , 1996 .

[10]  Edwin Mansfield,et al.  How Rapidly Does New Industrial Technology Leak Out , 1985 .

[11]  T. L. Schwartz.  The Logic of Collective Action , 1986 .

[12]  S. Winter,et al.  Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development , 1987 .

[13]  G. Marwell,et al.  THE PARADOX OF GROUP SIZE IN COLLECTIVE ACTION: A THEORY OF THE CRITICAL MASS. II. * , 1988 .

[14]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[15]  Doug McAdam,et al.  Collective identity and activism: Networks, choices, and the life of a social movement. , 1992 .

[16]  P. David.  Knowledge, Property, and the System Dynamics of Technological Change , 1992 .

[17]  G. Fraja,et al.  Strategic spillovers in patent races , 1993 .

[18]  Michaell Taylor,et al.  The Communal Resource: Transaction Costs and the Solution of Collective Action Problems , 1993 .

[19]  P. David,et al.  Toward a new economics of science , 1994 .

[20]  J-P.A. Hobbs.  Free for all , 1994, Nature.

[21]  S. Kotha.  Mass customization: Implementing the emerging paradigm for competitive advantage , 1995 .

[22]  D. MacKenzie,et al.  Tacit Knowledge, Weapons Design, and the Uninvention of Nuclear Weapons , 1995, American Journal of Sociology.

[23]  Kenneth W. Dam.  Some Economic Considerations in the Intellectual Property Protection of Software , 1995, The Journal of Legal Studies.

[24]  Dietmar Harhoff,et al.  Strategic spillovers and incentives for research and development , 1996 .

[25]  J. Liebeskind,et al.  Knowledge, Strategy, and the Theory of the Firm , 1996 .

[26]  Jacquelien van Stekelenburg,et al.  The social psychology of protest , 1997 .

[27]  E. Ostrom.  A Behavioral Approach to the Rational Choice Theory of Collective Action: Presidential Address, American Political Science Association, 1997 , 1998, American Political Science Review.

[28]  Eric S. Raymond,et al.  The cathedral and the bazaar - musings on Linux and Open Source by an accidental revolutionary , 2001 .

[29]  Eric S. Raymond,et al.  The Cathedral and the Bazaar , 2000 .

[30]  I. Nonaka,et al.  Enabling Knowledge Creation , 2000 .

[31]  Kwanghui Lim,et al.  The many faces of absorptive capacity : spillovers of copper interconnect technology for semiconductor chips , 2000 .

[32]  Pamela D. Morrison,et al.  Determinants of User Innovation and Innovation Sharing in a Local Market , 2000 .

[33]  Lee Sproull,et al.  Essence of Distributed Work: The Case of the Linux Kernel , 2000, First Monday.

[34]  Sonali Shah.  Sources and Patterns of Innovation in a Consumer Products Field: Innovations in Sporting Equipment , 2000 .

[35]  O. Granstrand.  The Economics and Management of Intellectual Property , 1999 .

[36]  Eric A. von Hippel,et al.  How Open Source Software Works: 'Free' User-to-User Assistance? , 2000 .

[37]  A. Arundel.  The relative effectiveness of patents and secrecy for appropriation , 2001 .

[38]  Alessandro Nuvolari,et al.  Collective invention during the British , 2004 .

[39]  Nikolaus Franke,et al.  How Communities Support Innovative Activities : An Exploration of Assistance and Sharing Among Innovative Users of Sporting Equipment , 2001 .

[40]  Salvatore Torrisi,et al.  Markets for technology , 2001 .

[41]  Wesley M. Cohen,et al.  R&D spillovers, patents and the incentives to innovate in Japan and the United States , 2002 .

[42]  Shane M. Greenstein,et al.  Markets for Technology , 2002, IEEE Micro.

[43]  J. Tirole,et al.  Some Simple Economics of Open Source , 2002 .

[44]  Joachim Henkel,et al.  Software Development in Embedded Linux - Informal Collaboration of Competing Firms , 2003, Wirtschaftsinformatik.

[45]  M. Narasimham,et al.  The economics of knowledge , 2003, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Manag..

[46]  Eric von Hippel,et al.  Open source software development and the private-collective innovation model: Issues for organization science , 2003 .

[47]  Henrik Sattler,et al.  Appropriability of product innovations: an empirical analysis for Germany , 2003, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[48]  H. Chesbrough.  The Era of Open Innovation , 2003 .

[49]  Siobhan O’Mahony.  Guarding the commons: how community managed software projects protect their work , 2003 .

[50]  Karim R. Lakhani,et al.  Community, Joining, and Specialization in Open Source Software Innovation: A Case Study , 2003 .

[51]  D. Harhoff,et al.  Profiting from Voluntary Information Spillovers: How Users Benefit by Freely Revealing Their Innovations , 2003 .

[52]  Sonali K. Shah,et al.  How Communities Support Innovative Activities: An Exploration of Assistance and Sharing Among End-Users , 2003 .

[53]  Guido Hertel,et al.  Motivation of software developers in Open Source projects: an Internet-based survey of contributors to the Linux kernel , 2003 .

[54]  Guido Hertel,et al.  Managing distance by interdependence: Goal setting, task interdependence, and team-based rewards in virtual teams , 2004 .

[55]  G. Cattani.  Essays on technological evolution , 2004 .

[56]  Sebastian Spaeth,et al.  Knowledge Reuse in Open Source Software: An Exploratory Study of 15 Open Source Projects , 2005, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[57]  John Cullen,et al.  Democratizing Innovation , 2020, Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship.

[58]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  The Architecture of Participation: Does Code Architecture Mitigate Free Riding in the Open Source Development Model? , 2006, Manag. Sci..