Aerosol Lidar Intercomparison in the Framework of SPALINET—The Spanish Lidar Network: Methodology and Results

A group of eight Spanish lidars was formed in order to extend the European Aerosol Research Lidar Network-Advanced Sustainable Observation System (EARLINET-ASOS) project. This study presents intercomparisons at the hardware and software levels. Results of the system intercomparisons are based on range-square-corrected signals in cases where the lidars viewed the same atmospheres. Comparisons were also made for aerosol backscatter coefficients at 1064 nm (2 systems) and 532 nm (all systems), and for extinction coefficients at 532 nm (2 systems). In total, three field campaigns were carried out between 2006 and 2007. Comparisons were limited to the highest layer found before the free troposphere, i.e., either the atmospheric boundary layer or the aerosol layer just above it. Some groups did not pass the quality assurance criterion on the first attempt. Following modification and improvement to these systems, all systems met the quality criterion. The backscatter algorithm intercomparison consisted of processing lidar signal profiles simulated for two types of atmospheric conditions. Three stages with increasing knowledge of the input parameters were considered. The results showed that all algorithms work well when all inputs are known. They also showed the necessity to perform, when possible, additional measurements to attain better estimation of the lidar ratio, which is the most critical unknown in the elastic lidar inversion.

[1]  David M. Winker,et al.  Initial Results from CALIPSO , 2006 .

[2]  D. Winker,et al.  Initial performance assessment of CALIOP , 2007 .

[3]  James D. Spinhirne,et al.  Micro pulse lidar , 1993, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[4]  V. Freudenthaler,et al.  Aerosol lidar intercomparison in the framework of the EARLINET project. 1. Instruments. , 2004, Applied optics.

[5]  Francesc Rocadenbosch,et al.  Intercomparison of spanish advanced lidars in the framework of EARLINET , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[6]  J. Slusser,et al.  On Rayleigh Optical Depth Calculations , 1999 .

[7]  NOTES AND CORRESPONDENCE Micropulse Lidar Signals: Uncertainty Analysis , 2002 .

[8]  H. Zwally ICESat's Laser Measurements of Polar Ice and Atmospheres , 2003 .

[9]  A. Smirnov,et al.  AERONET-a federated instrument network and data archive for aerosol Characterization , 1998 .

[10]  F. G. Fernald Analysis of atmospheric lidar observations: some comments. , 1984, Applied optics.

[11]  J. Klett Lidar inversion with variable backscatter/extinction ratios. , 1985, Applied optics.

[12]  A. Ansmann,et al.  Aerosol lidar intercomparison in the framework of the EARLINET project. 2. Aerosol backscatter algorithms. , 2004, Applied optics.

[13]  Ellsworth J. Welton,et al.  Global monitoring of clouds and aerosols using a network of micropulse lidar systems , 2001, SPIE Asia-Pacific Remote Sensing.

[14]  Gelsomina Pappalardo,et al.  European aerosol research lidar network-advanced sustainable observation system (EARLINET-ASOS) , 2007, International School on Quantum Electronics: Laser Physics and Applications.

[15]  J. Bösenberg,et al.  EARLINET: A European Aerosol Research Lidar Network to Establish an Aerosol Climatology , 2003 .

[16]  A. Ansmann,et al.  Independent measurement of extinction and backscatter profiles in cirrus clouds by using a combined Raman elastic-backscatter lidar. , 1992, Applied optics.

[17]  Y. Sasano,et al.  Significance of the extinction/backscatter ratio and the boundary value term in the solution for the two-component lidar equation. , 1984, Applied optics.