For a situational analytics: An interpretative methodology for the study of situations in computational settings

This article introduces an interpretative approach to the analysis of situations in computational settings called situational analytics. I outline the theoretical and methodological underpinnings of this approach, which is still under development, and show how it can be used to surface situations from large data sets derived from online platforms such as YouTube. Situational analytics extends to computationally-mediated settings a qualitative methodology developed by Adele Clarke, Situational Analysis (2005), which uses data mapping to detect heterogeneous entities in fieldwork data to determine ‘what makes a difference’ in a situation. Situational analytics scales up this methodology to analyse situations latent in computational data sets with semi-automated methods of textual and visual analysis. I discuss how this approach deviates from recent analyses of situations in computational social science, and argue that Clarke’s framework renders tractable a fundamental methodological problem that arises in this area of research: while social researchers turn to computational settings in order to analyse social life, the social processes unfolding in these envirnoments are fundamentally affected by the computational architectures in which they occur. Situational analytics offers a way to address this problematic by making a heterogeneously composed situation – involving social, technical and media elements – the unit of computational analysis. To conclude, I show how situational analytics can be applied in a case study of YouTube videos featuring intelligent vehicles and discuss how situational analysis itself needs to be elaborated if we are to come to terms with computational transformations of the situational fabric of social life.

[1]  Jannis Kallinikos,et al.  Social Media and the Infrastructuring of Sociality , 2019, Thinking Infrastructures.

[2]  Nick Seaver The nice thing about context is that everyone has it , 2015 .

[3]  刘润清 Language and Situation:Language varieties and their social contexts , 1984 .

[4]  S. L. Star,et al.  The Ethnography of Infrastructure , 1999 .

[5]  Ana Gross Data types and functions: a study of framing devices and techniques , 2015 .

[6]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  Computational Social Science , 2009, Science.

[7]  Geoffrey C. Bowker,et al.  Unsupervised by any other name: Hidden layers of knowledge production in artificial intelligence on social media , 2019, Big Data Soc..

[8]  Danah Boyd,et al.  I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience , 2011, New Media Soc..

[9]  Roger Burrows,et al.  The Coming Crisis of Empirical Sociology , 2007, Sociology.

[10]  William L. Hamilton,et al.  Language from police body camera footage shows racial disparities in officer respect , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  Vito Fragnelli,et al.  Introduction , 2019, IGTR.

[12]  D. Smith The conceptual practices of power : a feminist sociology of knowledge , 1991 .

[13]  N. Marres Why Map Issues? On Controversy Analysis as a Digital Method , 2015, Science, technology & human values.

[14]  Michael Castelle,et al.  The social lives of generative adversarial networks , 2020, FAT*.

[15]  Tian Peng,et al.  On Social Technology , 2005 .

[16]  Digitalizing the State: Data Centres and the Power of Exchange , 2019, Ethnos.

[17]  Arkaitz Zubiaga,et al.  Exploiting Context for Rumour Detection in Social Media , 2017, SocInfo.

[18]  Ann Mische,et al.  Between Conversation and Situation: Public Switching Dynamics Across Network-Domains , 1998 .

[19]  Petter Törnberg,et al.  Muslims in social media discourse: Combining topic modeling and critical discourse analysis , 2016 .

[20]  C. Lawrence The pasteurization of France , 1990, Medical History.

[21]  A. Gandini,et al.  Researching YouTube , 2018 .

[22]  A. Kelly The experimental hut: hosting vectors , 2012 .

[23]  Bernhard Rieder,et al.  Programmed method: developing a toolset for capturing and analyzing tweets , 2014, Aslib J. Inf. Manag..

[24]  H. Rheinberger Toward a History of Epistemic Things: Synthesizing Proteins in the Test Tube , 1997 .

[25]  Ingunn Moser,et al.  Experiments in Context and Contexting , 2012 .

[26]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Fairness and Abstraction in Sociotechnical Systems , 2019, FAT.

[27]  Esther Weltevrede,et al.  Multi-Situated App Studies: Methods and Propositions , 2019, Social Media + Society.

[28]  Jean-Philippe Cointet,et al.  Ce que le big data fait à l’analyse sociologique des textes , 2018 .

[29]  Jack Stilgoe,et al.  Machine learning, social learning and the governance of self-driving cars , 2017, Social studies of science.

[30]  Matthew J. Salganik,et al.  Bit by bit: social research in the digital age , 2019, The Journal of mathematical sociology.

[31]  K. K. Cetina Scopic media and global coordination : the mediatization of face-to-face , 2012 .

[32]  M. Savage,et al.  Reassembling Social Science Methods: The Challenge of Digital Devices , 2013 .

[33]  Barry A. T. Brown,et al.  The Trouble with Autopilots: Assisted and Autonomous Driving on the Social Road , 2017, CHI.

[34]  Luc Boltanski,et al.  The Sociology of Critical Capacity , 1999 .

[35]  Nicolas Legewie,et al.  Video Data Analysis: A Methodological Frame for a Novel Research Trend , 2018 .

[36]  K. K. Cetina The Synthetic Situation: Interactionism for a Global World , 2009 .

[37]  A. Clarke Situational Analyses: Grounded Theory Mapping After the Postmodern Turn , 2003 .

[38]  D. Nguyen Text as social and cultural data : a computational perspective on variation in text , 2017 .

[39]  Erving Goffman,et al.  The Neglected Situation , 1964 .

[40]  S. Woolgar,et al.  Mundane Governance: Ontology and Accountability , 2013 .

[41]  P. E. Jones,et al.  Data theory , 1991 .