Efficient Relaxation of Protein-Protein Interfaces by Discrete Molecular Dynamics Simulations.

Protein-protein interactions are responsible for the transfer of information inside the cell and represent one of the most interesting research fields in structural biology. Unfortunately, after decades of intense research, experimental approaches still have difficulties in providing 3D structures for the hundreds of thousands of interactions formed between the different proteins in a living organism. The use of theoretical approaches like docking aims to complement experimental efforts to represent the structure of the protein interactome. However, we cannot ignore that current methods have limitations due to problems of sampling of the protein-protein conformational space and the lack of accuracy of available force fields. Cases that are especially difficult for prediction are those in which complex formation implies a non-negligible change in the conformation of the interacting proteins, i.e., those cases where protein flexibility plays a key role in protein-protein docking. In this work, we present a new approach to treat flexibility in docking by global structural relaxation based on ultrafast discrete molecular dynamics. On a standard benchmark of protein complexes, the method provides a general improvement over the results obtained by rigid docking. The method is especially efficient in cases with large conformational changes upon binding, in which structure relaxation with discrete molecular dynamics leads to a predictive success rate double that obtained with state-of-the-art rigid-body docking.

[1]  Tammy M. K. Cheng,et al.  pyDock: Electrostatics and desolvation for effective scoring of rigid‐body protein–protein docking , 2007, Proteins.

[2]  Modesto Orozco,et al.  A consensus view of protein dynamics , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  Dmitri I Svergun,et al.  Structural characterization of protein-protein complexes by integrating computational docking with small-angle scattering data. , 2010, Journal of molecular biology.

[4]  P. Aloy,et al.  A systematic study of the energetics involved in structural changes upon association and connectivity in protein interaction networks. , 2011, Structure.

[5]  Carles Pons,et al.  Present and future challenges and limitations in protein–protein docking , 2010, Proteins.

[6]  M. Karplus,et al.  Effective energy function for proteins in solution , 1999, Proteins.

[7]  R. Abagyan,et al.  Identification of protein-protein interaction sites from docking energy landscapes. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[8]  B. Alder,et al.  Studies in Molecular Dynamics. I. General Method , 1959 .

[9]  Zhiping Weng,et al.  A protein–protein docking benchmark , 2003, Proteins.

[10]  C. Hall,et al.  Molecular dynamics simulations of spontaneous fibril formation by random-coil peptides. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  Alexandre M J J Bonvin,et al.  Flexible protein-protein docking. , 2006, Current opinion in structural biology.

[12]  Jeffrey J. Gray,et al.  Protein-protein docking with simultaneous optimization of rigid-body displacement and side-chain conformations. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[13]  Benny D. Freeman,et al.  Molecular Dynamics for Polymeric Fluids Using Discontinuous Potentials , 1997 .

[14]  Maxim Totrov,et al.  Improving CAPRI predictions: Optimized desolvation for rigid‐body docking , 2005, Proteins.

[15]  Zhiping Weng,et al.  Protein–protein docking benchmark version 4.0 , 2010, Proteins.

[16]  R. Abagyan,et al.  ICM‐DISCO docking by global energy optimization with fully flexible side‐chains , 2003, Proteins.

[17]  P. Aloy,et al.  Three-dimensional modeling of protein interactions and complexes is going 'omics. , 2011, Current opinion in structural biology.

[18]  R. Abagyan,et al.  Soft protein–protein docking in internal coordinates , 2002, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[19]  Carles Pons,et al.  Optimization of pyDock for the new CAPRI challenges: Docking of homology‐based models, domain–domain assembly and protein‐RNA binding , 2010, Proteins.

[20]  G J Williams,et al.  The Protein Data Bank: a computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures. , 1977, Journal of molecular biology.

[21]  A. Barabasi,et al.  An empirical framework for binary interactome mapping , 2008, Nature Methods.

[22]  Martin Zacharias,et al.  Accounting for conformational changes during protein-protein docking. , 2010, Current opinion in structural biology.

[23]  Feng Ding,et al.  Direct Observation of Protein Folding, Aggregation, and a Prion-like Conformational Conversion* , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[24]  Solène Grosdidier,et al.  Prediction and scoring of docking poses with pyDock , 2007, Proteins.

[25]  J. Borreguero,et al.  Mechanism for the α‐helix to β‐hairpin transition , 2003, Proteins.

[26]  M. Karplus,et al.  Interpreting the folding kinetics of helical proteins , 1999, Nature.

[27]  M. Sternberg,et al.  Modelling protein docking using shape complementarity, electrostatics and biochemical information. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[28]  Ruth Nussinov,et al.  Principles of docking: An overview of search algorithms and a guide to scoring functions , 2002, Proteins.

[29]  S. Buldyrev,et al.  Folding Trp-cage to NMR resolution native structure using a coarse-grained protein model. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[30]  Martin Zacharias,et al.  Rapid protein–ligand docking using soft modes from molecular dynamics simulations to account for protein deformability: Binding of FK506 to FKBP , 2004, Proteins.

[31]  E. Fischer Einfluss der Configuration auf die Wirkung der Enzyme , 1894 .

[32]  David W Ritchie,et al.  Recent progress and future directions in protein-protein docking. , 2008, Current protein & peptide science.

[33]  P. Chacón,et al.  Thorough validation of protein normal mode analysis: a comparative study with essential dynamics. , 2007, Structure.

[34]  M. Orozco,et al.  Finding Conformational Transition Pathways from Discrete Molecular Dynamics Simulations. , 2012, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[35]  F. Ding,et al.  Ab initio RNA folding by discrete molecular dynamics: from structure prediction to folding mechanisms. , 2008, RNA.

[36]  M. Sternberg,et al.  Insights into protein flexibility: The relationship between normal modes and conformational change upon protein–protein docking , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  Brigita Urbanc,et al.  In silico study of amyloid β-protein folding and oligomerization , 2004 .

[38]  C. Dominguez,et al.  HADDOCK: a protein-protein docking approach based on biochemical or biophysical information. , 2003, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[39]  Modesto Orozco,et al.  Protein flexibility from discrete molecular dynamics simulations using quasi‐physical potentials , 2010, Proteins.

[40]  David Baker,et al.  Protein-protein docking with backbone flexibility. , 2007, Journal of molecular biology.