DEVELOPMENT OF AN INTEGRATED MODEL FOR THE EVALUATION AND PLANNING OF RAILROAD TRACK MAINTENANCE

In order for a railroad to function effectively all aspects of the system should be maintained in good working order. Locomotives and rolling stock regularly move through areas where they can be inspected and maintained. However track does not move, so inspectors must traverse the line either on foot or in a rail mounted vehicle and maintenance crews must be sent to specific locations to make track repairs, which may not always happen before a service disruption. A track failure, due to either exceeding some industry or governmental specification or an acute failure, such as a rail break, can result in costly delays or even derailments with significant consequences. To help avoid such failures, it is beneficial for a railroad to be able to predict when and where failures might occur and then evaluate the relative costs and benefits of performing maintenance activities to ensure that the most cost effective actions are taken. A model is being developed to assist in the process of scheduling and directing track maintenance work. The model consists of three primary modules: an integrated track quality and degradation module, a maintenance activity selection module, and a scheduling optimization module. By taking into account a wide range of costs and benefits, the model can help railroad infrastructure managers better account for risk and indirect costs such as track time, as well as account for the criticality of certain types of imminent failures. This paper will describe the inputs and outputs for the model, as well as detailing the concepts associated with each of the model components.Copyright © 2013 by ASME

[1]  Bryan W. Schlake,et al.  Train Delay and Economic Impact of In-Service Failures of Railroad Rolling Stock , 2011 .

[2]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  Modeling rail fatigue behavior with multiple hazards , 1996 .

[3]  Jui-Sheng Chou,et al.  Web-based CBR system applied to early cost budgeting for pavement maintenance project , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[4]  D E Staplin,et al.  EMPIRICAL RAIL WEAR MODEL , 1983 .

[5]  C. Barkan,et al.  Derailment Probability Analyses and Modeling of Mainline Freight Trains , 2005 .

[6]  Xiang Liu,et al.  Analysis of Derailments by Accident Cause , 2011 .

[7]  Yanfeng Ouyang,et al.  A Heuristic Approach to the Railroad Track Maintenance Scheduling Problem , 2011, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[8]  C J Boon,et al.  STATE-OF-THE-ART TRACK TECHNOLOGY AND ITS APPLICATION TO IMPROVE TRACK COMPONENT PERFORMANCE AND TRACK MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT. FINAL REPORT , 1987 .

[9]  J. E. Gordon,et al.  Evaluation of rail test frequencies using risk analysis , 2009 .

[10]  Steven A. Gabriel,et al.  A multiobjective optimization model for project selection with probabilistic considerations , 2006 .

[11]  Michael Burrow,et al.  Reliability analysis and maintenance decision for railway sleepers using track condition information , 2007, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[12]  Luis Ferreira,et al.  Modelling Rail Track Performance: An Integrated Approach , 2000 .

[13]  Ernest T. Selig,et al.  Track Geotechnology and Substructure Management , 1995 .

[14]  J. D. MacLean,et al.  Percentage renewals and average life of railway ties , 1957 .

[15]  Christopher P. L. Barkan,et al.  Effect of Train Speed on Risk Analysis of Transporting Hazardous Materials by Rail , 2010 .

[16]  Yanping Cui,et al.  Case-based reasoning and rule-based reasoning for railway incidents prevention , 2005, Proceedings of ICSSSM '05. 2005 International Conference on Services Systems and Services Management, 2005..

[17]  Dirk P. Kroese,et al.  Handbook of Monte Carlo Methods , 2011 .

[18]  Tecnica American Railway Engineering and Maintenance-of-Way Association , 2012 .

[19]  Yanfeng Ouyang,et al.  Track maintenance production team scheduling in railroad networks , 2012 .

[20]  S M Chrismer,et al.  MECHANICS-BASED MODEL TO PREDICT BALLAST-RELATED MAINTENANCE TIMING AND COSTS , 1991 .

[21]  Deeparnab Chakrabarty,et al.  Knapsack Problems , 2008 .

[22]  Eugene J. H. Kerckhoffs,et al.  Case-Based Reasoning in an Ultrasonic Rail-Inspection System , 1997, ICCBR.

[23]  Marcus Bengtsson,et al.  Condition based maintenance systems : An Investigation of Technical Constituets and Organizational Aspects , 2004 .

[24]  Christopher P. L. Barkan,et al.  Relationship between Train Length and Accident Causes and Rates , 2008 .

[25]  Kari Alanne,et al.  Selection of renovation actions using multi-criteria “knapsack” model , 2004 .

[26]  Vedat Verter,et al.  Modeling of Transport Risk for Hazardous Materials , 1998, Oper. Res..

[27]  M D Roney,et al.  THE ROAD MAINTENANCE COST MODEL , 1981 .

[28]  Christopher P. L. Barkan,et al.  Cost-Effectiveness of Railway Infrastructure Renewal Maintenance , 2006 .

[29]  R Granstroem,et al.  Management of condition information from railway punctuality perspectives , 2008 .

[30]  Saurabh Kumar,et al.  A study of the rail degradation process to predict rail breaks , 2006 .

[31]  Mohd Rapik Saat,et al.  Benefit-Cost Analysis of Infrastructure Improvement for Derailment Prevention , 2010 .

[32]  O Orringer,et al.  Control of rail integrity by self-adaptive scheduling of rail tests , 1990 .

[33]  Rikard Granström,et al.  Maintenance for improved punctuality. A study of condition monitoring technology for the Swedish railway sector , 2006 .

[34]  Andy Collop,et al.  The application of Weibull statistics to the strength of railway ballast , 2004 .

[35]  Christopher P. L. Barkan,et al.  Communication and Interpretation of Results of Route Risk Analyses of Hazardous Materials Transportation by Railroad , 2009 .

[36]  W. Zhong,et al.  Experimental investigation between rolling contact fatigue and wear of high-speed and heavy-haul railway and selection of rail material , 2011 .